As Predicted, Conservatives Attack Cruz

Rush Limbaugh.com ^ | March 24, 2015 | Rush Limbaugh

[Kaslin]

RUSH: Ladies and gentlemen, yesterday Ted Cruz makes his speech at Liberty University, and I shared with you the fact that I had spoken with Mr. Cruz on Friday. And I shared with you additionally that I had told him one thing after he asked. It's important for you to know that he asked. I did not sit there and tell him how to do his business. I warned him, I told him that something I have noticed in the last probably three or four presidential primaries, certainly the last two or three, what happens is that conservatives take out conservative candidates.

I mean the Drive-Bys do, too, don't misunderstand. Like CNN. You know what CNN's done? CNN edited video of Ted Cruz's speech yesterday, and they drew an arrow to a portion of the back of his jacket and said, "This is what happens when you don't use a podium." They had found a bulge in his jacket. They don't state it, but they imply that Ted Cruz was getting advice, was getting help from somebody backstage through a communications device, because he didn't have a podium.

It all boils down to he didn't have a prompter, and they just can't believe that somebody could go out there and speak like that without a prompter. So he had to have somebody coaching him. Remember, they tried to accuse George W. Bush of this in one of the debates he was having with Algore. And all it was is the battery pack and the wireless transmitter for the wireless mic that Cruz was using. But there's CNN with a full-fledged implication that Cruz was cheating. So we know the Drive-Bys are gonna go after Cruz. That's a no-brainer.

But one thing I've noticed is that this quest -- in some cases it's a quest; in other cases, another reason for it -- this quest for perfection that seems to possess or obsess many conservative groups leads them to nitpick and find a single issue or maybe two that conservative candidate X is supposedly wrong on, and they immediately launch into criticism. And when conservatives launch criticism of conservative candidates, the media just eats it up. They just love it, and they glom onto it, and they amplify it even more than their own criticism.

I warned Senator Cruz that this would happen to him, and it already has begun. I forget the name, a blogger at National Review Online wrote that Cruz is gonna have to learn how to speak better. He speaks at people rather than to them and he comes off like a used car salesman at a motivational rally or some such thing. It's just uncanny. You got some conservatives out there, we had a call yesterday, the birther issue is back, saying Cruz is disqualified 'cause he's not a citizen, not a real one. And of course the Drive-Bys eat that up, too. And the Drive-Bys are saying, "See? See? It just proves that the attack on Obama and his birth was racist, because they're giving Cruz a pass on it but they didn't give Obama a pass on it so it's racist."

Then yesterday on Fox, The Five in the afternoon dumped all over Ted Cruz for one thing or another. That's somewhat understandable for reasons I can't explain. You have to figure that out yourself. And then last night, grab audio sound bite number 11 on Special Report with Bret Baier. They were talking about Cruz and his announcement yesterday. Shannon Bream was filling in as the host for Bret Baier. She turned to Charles Krauthammer and said, "He talked a lot about the Constitution and freedom and liberty and very broad policy, repealing Obamacare, some of things he has been working on and talking about since he got in the Senate." Here's Dr. Krauthammer.

KRAUTHAMMER: First term senators, we already tried a first term senator, and that's why when Scott Walker says a proven track record, what Walker has, he doesn't have the fluency on issues that a Cruz does and he's made a lot of stumbles thus far. Cruz talks about you have to walk the walk rather than just talk the talk, you have to have done something, but that's not his record in the Senate. He's a good rhetoritician but when Walker says: I ran the state. I took on the unions. I took on the liberals and I won. I think there's gonna be a strong argument.

RUSH: Now, I have no argument with that. I have made it myself when it comes to Scott Walker. But really, is one of the knocks on Ted Cruz gonna be that he's just like Obama? That he doesn't have enough experience? Just like Obama, he's only served a certain number of days in the Senate and he has not run a state, and he hasn't really walked the walk and accomplished anything, just like Obama? What is this?

If Obama had run a state or if Obama had been in the Senate longer, he'd have been okay? Obama would have been a better president if he had just been in the Senate longer, maybe been a governor? Is that all this is about? This is horse hockey, folks, that Barack Obama is what he is only because of a lack of experience? I don't know how you come to that conclusion. Barack Obama is who he is because of his ideology.

Barack Obama could have come straight from the community organizer office and become president and been exactly who he is. He could have serve the governorship, served as governor of Illinois for two terms, become president and be the same president he is today. This argument that we're gonna disqualify Ted Cruz because we've learned how bad an inexperienced president can be. Obama and his foibles, Obama and his presidency that is a disaster has nothing to do with the fact that he's inexperienced. It has everything to do with who he is. Ditto, Ted Cruz. It's who he is that is the determining factor here.

And, by the way, let's talk about this experience for just a second. Here we have a two-year Senator, Barack Obama, he serves two years, 160-some-odd days. He's a first term Senator. He becomes president. Obama is running circles around the entire Congress, which is made up of what? All kinds of experienced politicians. Obama is embarrassing them. Obama's making mincemeat of professional career politicians with decades, in some cases, worth of experience. And I don't like that. That embarrasses me that a supposed neophyte who's never done anything comes into town and starts running rings around professional politicians?

I think that illustrates how wrong-headed -- by the way, Krauthammer, I'm not harping on him. Krauthammer's not the only person mentioning this criticism. There's all kinds of people coming up with all kinds of creative reasons, on the conservative side, to disqualify Ted Cruz, exactly as I predicted would be the case. But I think it stretches credulity to say that, "Oh, man, this is what happens, Barack Obama, this is what happens when you elect somebody that doesn't have much experience in Washington."

It wouldn't matter how much experience Obama had because experience does not determine who he is. And ditto for Cruz. And again, just to repeat this argument that we've got this neophyte inexperienced Obama and that's why he's been a disaster, somehow running rings and embarrassing all of these seasoned, experienced, brilliant, inside-the-Beltway politicians in the House and the Senate.

You see, a conservative who leads, who is unafraid, unflappable as Cruz is, and who is principled, who can relate, who can articulate and who has a mission, can do a great deal as president, whether he was a governor, a senator, or whatever. I've heard the arguments against electing senators because they don't have any executive experience. They're one-man operations and they're fraught with overinflated egos.

I've been persuaded by that argument now and then, but it's always dependent on who we're talking about. People are individuals and no two are the same, and to simply start broad brushing people -- I mean, the thing I think that's flawed here is the assumption that Obama's as bad as he is because he didn't have any experience. If Obama had been a two-term governor in Illinois, what would be different in the Obama presidency? I dare say, in terms of substance, very little would be different.

Anyway, we've got a whole roster of sound bites here to give examples for you, to you, of the kind of criticism that Cruz is getting, all of it predictable. Some of it quite frustrating.

BREAK TRANSCRIPT

RUSH: Another criticism I've heard of Ted Cruz, swerving into a different subject here, in addition to the fact that he's like Obama, he doesn't have enough experience -- which I think is bogus. Obama's not as bad as he is 'cause he doesn't have experience. He's as bad as he is because he's a liberal, extreme radical. Another criticism of Ted Cruz is, "Well, show me what he's done? Hell, Ted Cruz hasn't done anything. Scott Walker, he's done things."

I can't disagree with the fact Scott Walker's done things. But Ted Cruz has been in the Senate. At this stage, if you ask me, I humbly point out, it's not a matter of what has Ted Cruz done. It has a little bit more relevance to me to ask, "What has Ted Cruz stopped?" The objective here the past six years has been to stop Obama. We have not had the majority in anything until a couple of months ago. There was no way we had the votes to stop Obamacare. What do you mean, what has Ted Cruz done?

Let's list his accomplishments, which is more than we get out of Obama. He's beaten the GOP leadership in election after election. He was in Texas. He's a Harvard graduate. He's got all these qualifications. He's got a great resume. What do you mean, what's Ted Cruz done? These are criticisms coming from conservatives, by the way. As I... (interruption) The real question is: What has Ted Cruz stopped? That takes us to what the left loves to point out, and that's the government shutdown.

Ted Cruz has done his level best to stop as much of Obama as he can, and he still is. That, to me, is more relevant than asking, "What has Ted Cruz done?" The whole point of Ted Cruz and anybody who's able to articulate an agenda like he is, is we've gotta be pretty confident what he will do, if given the chance. Unless of course he's just saying all this "for domestic consumption," like the Ayatollah Khamenei. "Death to America! Death to America!"

That Ted Cruz he's so stupid. He's so dangerous! We've gotta destroy Ted Cruz.

"Death to America! Death to America!" Oh, he's just saying that for the Iranian people. We don't have to worry about that.

BREAK TRANSCRIPT

[Carry_Okie]

Then yesterday on Fox, The Five in the afternoon dumped all over Ted Cruz for one thing or another. That's somewhat understandable for reasons I can't explain. You have to figure that out yourself.

IOW Rush won't point out that Fox doesn't want Cruz because Rupert Murdoch wants amnesty for illegals.

This argument that we're gonna disqualify Ted Cruz because we've learned how bad an inexperienced president can be.

George Washington hadn't ever been elected to anything. To my knowledge, neither had Eisenhower.

[WriteOn]

Republican is a synonym for “eating your own”

[PapaNew]

God can and will use anything from a donkey to a gourd to people like you, me, or a guy named Cruz. What we need in this country is a major shift from trusting in man back to trusting in God.

As far as your other comment, I don't want to get off on this really, but just wanted to share something with you about that.

But as it is written, Eye has not seen, nor ear heard, neither have entered into the heart of man, the things which God has prepared for them that love him (1 Corinthians 2:9). Many stop there because that is the same verse as Isaiah 64:4 in the old testament.

But the cross of Christ has put us under under the new covenant which has changed that and so many things. We are now privy to God's plans and purposes. The verse continues,

But God has revealed them unto us by his Spirit: for the Spirit searches all things, yes, the deep things of God (1 Corinthians 2:10).

[HiTech RedNeck]

Well, maybe your guess at one more sweep was a hint to you from the Holy Spirit. On the other hand, similar guesses have been going on from the early days of the church. The Holy Spirit doesn’t play waffle games.

I think this is talking about the character of eternal salvation not about earthly details of passing history.

[Gumdrop]

I think this GOP endorsement will come down to the candidate who cannot only talk conservatives, but can demonstrate that he is a leader and will govern conservatively.

I also believe in the Reagan doctrine. Any candidate who finds it necessary to bad mouth the other candidates, is not a worthy candidate, IMHO. So, the cream will rise to the top.

[SWAMPSNIPER]

Krauthammer is wrong about many things.

[Defiant]

It wouldn’t be America if it wasn’t living with God.

[C. Edmund Wright]

not true...Obama has a very thin skin - he’s just protected by a very thick media, and helped by spineless opposition.

[x]

Interesting controversy. Maybe Obama didn't bother about criticism during his campaign because he didn't notice it -- he was too focused on getting elected.

Now, when he has all this free time on his hands, it gets to him.

____________

The question about Cruz is whether he's the inevitable and best conservative candidate or whether he's an interloper who's getting in the way of a better candidate. That has something to do with electability. Also with whether you've been thinking about Ted Cruz for months or years, or whether you've been looking at other candidates and Ted just happens to show up and complicate things. And also about which word you emphasize in "best conservative candidate," since the most conservative candidate and best candidate may not be the same person. In any event, Ted Cruz's candidacy is something conservatives are going to disagree about.

[HiTech RedNeck]

Well, a lot of America lives that way now. Caesar is their Lord.

[HiTech RedNeck]

Whatever else you can say about Ted. Ted is sincere.

[C. Edmund Wright]

I don’t think so. I don’t think true conservatives are the Cruz birthers. And I don’t think there’s many of them, but they are noisy.

[Zeneta]

You bring up very good points regarding Cruz being the “best” or most “conservative” candidate.

Objectively, all true.

Time will tell.

IMHO, the Cruz campaign is as grass roots as it gets. He will need to build a massive ground force that can reach people one on one.

Cruz needs to talk to people as individuals, not groups.

He needs to explain how dems want to place them into groups and they are not a group, they are individuals.

I believe that message will be received and his electability will shock people.

[Defiant]

Some Americans may live Godless lives. They always have. Thomas Paine was an atheist. Many founders were deists. But America would not be America without a deep commitment to Godly virtues and faith. It would just be a bit of ground between the Atlantic and Pacific with a bunch of hedonists in it. Which is what we are, almost. Another generation of de-Christianization and we may be at that point. And whatever is here, it won’t be America. Americans can move to the Outback, to Alaska, or an Island in the Pacific and that will be more America than the piece of ground where followers of Alinsky and Marx live.

[HiTech RedNeck]

What would Amerigo Vespucci say?

[Defiant]

He’s say, “Hah, suck it, Columbus!”

[HiTech RedNeck]

Ah Vespuccia, the gem of the ocean...

[Nifster]

precisely(though some here at FR seem to believe otherwise)

[Romans Nine]

Amen, Amen, Amen and Amen!

BTW a freeper since 98? You are a stud.

[SoConPubbie]

Well I hope so. I hope a good guy gets in there but honestly, America’s salvation and restoration won’t be coming from some “savior-politician.”

No, but God desires a righteous, brave man to lead our Country and Ted Cruz is that man!