1 posted on
01/27/2015 9:03:01 AM PST by
LSUfan
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-34 next last
To: LSUfan
Sounds like a form of arbitration.
To: LSUfan
All this is...is a few muzzies saying they don’t want to go to US courts.
To: LSUfan
This is a step towards an act of sovereignty and Americans simply do not have the strength to form an effective resistance. Lord what a disgusting demographic Americans have become; i.e. any little group of Third World imbeciles can push us around at will.
To: LSUfan
get the mfing muslims out of this country... sharia law... b.s. islam is political b.s. and is anti AMERICA and if we are smart we will not bend or budge an inch..THEY CONFORM TO OUR RULES OR LEAVE...the sooner the better....useless scum...go back to the liter box you came from...
13 posted on
01/27/2015 9:27:48 AM PST by
zzwhale
To: LSUfan
14 posted on
01/27/2015 9:28:11 AM PST by
444Flyer
(How long O LORD?)
To: LSUfan
First they ask for equal treatment, then they'll ask for legal recognition by other legal bodies, then they'll ask it'll be the law of the land.
For everybody.
15 posted on
01/27/2015 9:30:52 AM PST by
BitWielder1
(Corporate Profits are better than Government Waste)
To: LSUfan
Does that mean a head-chopper can be found not-guilty by this islamic tribunal and escape US criminal justice via the Double-Jeopardy Clause?
Don't laugh, Barack Hussein Obama might just agree.
To: LSUfan
We once were a nation of laws, before Mexican loyalists and Islamists began colonizing this settled nation.
17 posted on
01/27/2015 9:33:12 AM PST by
a fool in paradise
(Shickl-Gruber's Big Lie gave us Hussein's Un-Affordable Care act (HUAC).)
To: LSUfan
they can call themselves whatever they like, they aren’t a real court
20 posted on
01/27/2015 9:35:58 AM PST by
GeronL
To: LSUfan
The bearded savages a taking a piece of the USA, a little bit at a time.
21 posted on
01/27/2015 9:37:33 AM PST by
I want the USA back
(Media: completely irresponsible. Complicit in the destruction of this country.)
To: LSUfan
It worked so well in France...
26 posted on
01/27/2015 9:51:04 AM PST by
null and void
(The aggregate effect of competitive capitalism is indistinguishable from magic)
To: LSUfan
It doesn’t matter what it’s called. The problem is that it has been allowed to exist. It’s the Moozie’s nose under the edge of the tent. The tent will be full of Moozies very soon IF it’s not stopped.
31 posted on
01/27/2015 9:59:51 AM PST by
rockinqsranch
((Dems, Libs, Socialists, call 'em what you will. They ALL have fairies livin' in their trees.))
To: LSUfan
“Sharia law to resolve civil disputes in family and business matters”
Replacing divorce law and contract with the will of Imams.
I feel so much better now.
32 posted on
01/27/2015 10:03:50 AM PST by
Uncle Miltie
(Bush / Clinton 2016! Clinton / Bush 2020! Uniparty Rules!)
To: LSUfan
Search the archives of JihadWatch.org to review the meteoric rise of shariah courts in the UK. IIRC, about a dozen shariah courts were sanctioned the first year and by the second year there were over a hundred operating and boasting their existence prior to first dozen. Sadly, traitor to the CoE, archbishop Rowan (at the time) expressed this was a welcome trend.
In August 2007, sharia courts began passing judgements. Two more courts are being planned for Edinburgh and Glasgow. Sheikh Faiz-ul-Aqtab Siddiqi, chairman of the governing counsel of the tribunal anticipates the courts will be handling a number of smaller criminal cases in coming years as more muslim clients approach them. "All we're doing is regulating community affairs in these cases" said Sheikh Faiz-ul-Aqtab Siddiqi.
"It appears the British sharia court allowance is expanding from domestic relations and inheritance to criminal issues as we speak. (2008)"
When it comes to Islam, nothing is as innocuous as it appears. Expect the same explosion of shariah courts here in the US. Once the camels nose is allowed to penetrate the skirt if the tent, it becomes increasingly difficult to push back in this climate of victimology.
35 posted on
01/27/2015 10:06:05 AM PST by
wtd
To: LSUfan
The camels nose is in the tent.
37 posted on
01/27/2015 10:12:09 AM PST by
rhubarbk
(Go Ted Go!)
To: LSUfan
One of the attorneys for the tribunal said participation and acceptance of the tribunals decisions are voluntary.For now.
40 posted on
01/27/2015 10:14:31 AM PST by
dfwgator
To: LSUfan
This is a state issue. The state of Texas could certainly disallow and shut down such a tribunal as contrary to the laws and Constitution of the state of Texas. They should do just that.
44 posted on
01/27/2015 10:23:16 AM PST by
PapaNew
(The grace of God & freedom always win the debate in the forum of ideas over unjust law & government)
To: LSUfan
I wonder just how voluntary it all is, given known propensities of Moslems to kill people who don’t do what they think is correct.
47 posted on
01/27/2015 10:31:02 AM PST by
arthurus
(It's true!)
To: LSUfan
49 posted on
01/27/2015 10:51:50 AM PST by
jda
("Righteousness exalts a nation . . .")
To: LSUfan
wow! I wonder if I can set up my own court system too
50 posted on
01/27/2015 10:53:40 AM PST by
Mr. K
(Palin/Cruz 2016 (for 16 years of conservative bliss))
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-34 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson