Posted on 10/25/2014 9:28:59 AM PDT by Kaslin
Militant Islamists don't just hate George Bush, baseball, and apple pie, they hate Canadians too. Islamists hate as a fundamental characteristic, and that hate is driven by the orthodox doctrines of their bestial death-cult. They even hate Barack Obama. Despite his world-wide apology tour and his dutiful obeisance to all things Islam, the violent jihadists continue to wage war against the Great Satan. It matters not if his face is white or black, the American Devil refuses to bow the knee to sharia law and the prophet of Islam—this is all the reason they need for hate.
Even if you bought the load of bovine excrement that Obama shoveled during the 2008 election campaign, felt the pangs of white guilt or imperialist remorse, and cast your atoning vote for the transformative icon, beaming with messianic glory—slimy cave trolls like Nidal Hasan, Alton Nolan, Michael Zehaf-Bibeau, and Zale Thompson hate you too.
The Canadians have reacted to this act of barbarity in a manner that is ennobling in the face of such tragedy. The Canadian Prime Minister, Stephen Harper, has acknowledged, unequivocally, the true nature of the menace and has, therefore, provided a rational and moral basis for meeting out justice in form and proportion equal to the real threat. He is a stark contrast to the mealy-mouthed Obama who natters while enthralled in befuddlement. Obama can’t quite get his head around the fact that jihadists won’t be charmed into submission or talked into surrender.
Harper isn’t cowering impotently behind the Obama administration's term of art, "workplace violence." A purely political artifice made ghastly because it defames the victims and the heroes who acted in the face of Nidal Hasan's terroristic rampage.
The "workplace violence" pseudonym is a loin cloth that Obama clutches before his naked impotence.
These acts can’t be terrorism because it refutes the party line promulgated by the Obama administration and their media toadies. These acts of terrorism demonstrate conclusively that Obama’s policy of appeasement is a colossal failure. All of Obama’s bowing and scraping, his flight from Iraq, the release of five top level terrorists from Gitmo, and his base campaign of Islamo-centric political correctness have only resulted in violence and death in our own towns and cities. Obama has only succeeded in making citizens less safe.
As much as Obama and his sneering cronies represent the ignoble, Canada’s Parliamentarian Sergeant-At-Arms, Kevin Vickers, represents the heroic and is a living example of the profoundly efficacious principle of “the only thing that stops a bad guy with a gun is a good guy with a gun.” This is difficult for progressives to understand but Michael Zehaf-Bibeau was an evil man engaged in an evil activity. It was not “senseless violence” as the perpetually confused Barack Obama asserts. The violence was purposeful and was in the pursuit of a clear objective. Obama’s characterization of “senseless violence” implies that it was some spontaneous and amoral happening, like a tornado, car accident, or a playground scuffle. This is profoundly wrong and smears the heroic acts of Mr Vickers.
Zehaf-Bibeau set out to do murder in the name of Islam and to perpetrate an act of terrorism upon the very heart of Canadian civilization. Mr. Vickers defended not only the people in the line of murderous fire but the nation itself. Obama’s reactions to these incidents demonstrate his complete indifference to the heroic actions of American citizens and to the interests of our national security. Obama is an empty suit.
Mr. Vickers did what all men of honor and conviction do when confronted with a mortal threat. He armed himself and strolled out into the marbled halls of the parliament building to confront evil. Mr. Vickers knew he was carrying out justice and that Zehaf-Bibeau had condemned himself by the evil of his actions. Killing that Islamozai trash was a moral obligation. As the crowds of sheep ran, hid, barricaded themselves, or armed themselves with kitchen knives, Mr. Vickers strode the halls with the confidence of righteousness and ended the miserable existence of a base terrorist. No man of honor would shrink from such a duty.
In our own country we have witnessed another act of “lone wolf” style terrorism. A muslim armed with a hatchet attacked a group of New York City Police Department (NYPD) officers. Evil men will always find tools for their trade. Despite some of the most restrictive gun control laws in the country, Zale Thompson managed to critically injure one NYPD officer and seriously wound another. Gunny Sergeant Hartman had it right, “it is a hard hart that kills.” Gun control laws only make easy victims out of the law abiding. Evil men will always acquire whatever tools they deem necessary to carry out their evil plans. But, gun control isn’t about saving lives, it’s about control. For all its platitudes about liberty and unbridled freedom, progressivism is just about imposing control and coalescing power into the hands of an oligarchy. Oily progressives can’t even keep their grubby tentacles off your favorite size soft-drink cup.
Clearly, Obama and his party don’t have any answers. Despite Obama’s promises of transparency in 2008, his administration is riddled with corruption and scandal. Despite Obama’s globe trotting junket of apology and appeasement, the threat of Islamist terror is greater now than ever. The Canadians are getting this one right because their government is not at cross purposes with their national interest. Terrorists continue to evolve their tactics to suit an ever changing operational environment. Obama is either too stupid or too doctrinaire to recognize the threat and as long as his party remains in power, America will continue to suffer the humiliation of retreat.
Lone Wolf Terrorist Muzzies.
The media liked saying Eric Rudolph was Christian. He wasn’t. They liked doing the same for Timothy McVeigh too but he was far removed from Christianity. But they have a hard time calling a muslim terrorist a muslim terrorist.
Not stupid. Evil, malevolent, nefarious and his Islamic roots are showing with his hatred for Israel and America and all America’s allies; this includes America’s military but leave the backyard “waterways” alone...evil,.
I just hope and pray America doesn’t go the way of Rome in two more years with the barbarians flooding through the southern borders and Obama importing” moderate Islamists,” whatever those are.
Might be nice to take a note from Canada but I think the snarky snarks and the political czars will poo-poo while eating their own ebola-ized sh*t and believing it.
The author leaves out the possibility that Obama is a Muslim or Muslim sympathizer who supports jihad against the West and want Islam to conquer the land of the infidels.
***They even hate Barack Obama.***
Mr. Nantz apparently knows something I don’t.
I’m not sure that just because British & Canadian heads of government condemn Islamic violence that it means they are standing up to Islamic violence. They may just be paying lip service to it. I haven’t seen Cameron deporting his grooming gangs yet.
He's not confused at all. There's simply no room in his worldview for "evil" unless it's connected to racism, conservatism, Christianity, or capitalism. Expecting him to brand Islamic terrorism as "evil" is like asking someone to draw a square circle.
They HATE everything but most of all I believe that they hate themselves deep down having no comfort in their own being or where life can take them. Death to them is the answer. Muzzie heaven awaits. They are even worse off emotionally than Progressives.
The FBI thought the 1992 World Trade Center bombers were lone wolves too. We know how that worked out.
“The author leaves out the possibility that Obama is a Muslim or Muslim sympathizer.....”
.
Can you think of ANY politician or well known TV commentator who has dared to comment on this possibility?
This is a subject that begs to be discussed but never is — not even by the likes of BOR, Megyn Kelly, Sean and not even Rush.
They all live and operate under the umbrella of PC. All their commentaries really never touch on the whole truth. They wouldn’t dare to reach that far out.
All Muslims are mandated to Jihad by MadMo and the Koran.
Thus, it is unambiguously clear that any and all Muslims pose a risk of going Jihadi-Wacko at any time and with no warning.
As proof, Google the picture of the Muslim who shot up the Canadian Parliament, the one with his dog in his arms as he sat on the porch.
As any can be dangerous, follow the wisdom of St Ann, who said “Invade them, Convert them, or Kill them”.
0bola is a closet SoA.
No jihad is a lone-wolf event. Fourteen hundred years of this garbage proves the consistency of collective brainwashing the Islamic doctrine creates.
Sigh. The msm persists with the 'lone wolf' narrative when it's highly unlikely any of these jihad attacks were done without some coordination from fellow believers fulfilling their doctrinal obligation to perform jihad. This instance is no exception. There were two very early reports online which revealed details ignored by the mainstream media. No surprise there.
a freelance photographer approached four officers assigned to foot patrol with the 103rd Precinct and asked to take their picture . . .As the officers posed for the shot on the rainy street, Zale Thompson, who was swinging an 18 1/2-inch metal hatchet, charged and struck Officer Joseph Meeker
then from the
"...Police were responding to a dispute between the man and a woman, the Post reports.
The statement above suggests that detail was in the NYPost, but it does not appear there. Only the Gothamist suggested the four 'rookie officers' were responding to request for assistance due to an alleged 'dispute'.
No further identification of this 'freelance photographer is provided anywhere.
Did this individual provide a witness statement to the police and preserve any images captured during requested pose?
Are we to believe this was merely a fantastic COINCIDENCE that this 'freelance photographer' managed to distract these four officers PRECISELY COINCIDENTAL to this hatchet assault?
Is there a police report filed for this alleged assault for which these four 'rookie' LEOs responded? Or, was the call a ruse to bring uniformed officers to that location as a set up for jihad propaganda - complete with 'freelance photographer' and a decent surveillance camera positioned to film the episode with unusually good resolution to that angle on that spot in the middle of the sidewalk?
A school shooting is a sign of an epidemic...a larger problem that must be addressed.
But acts of violence against soldiers and police officers is nothing more than a coincidence of “lone wolves” out there and not a sign that terrorism is inside our borders.
Liberalism on display, folks!
That Lone Wolf was not a Muslim.
I heard a talk show caller make an interesting point a while back. Most life insurance policies have a provision that exempts them paying for acts of war or terrorism. Had they labeled it as terrorism, could the survivors have collected? Not saying that's the administrations motivation, but it's something I hadn't thought of before and never heard mentioned.
I’ve heard about the exempt issue before but Truth or Fiction doesn’t comment on it.
Both groups have issues due to anxiety over their small Wurlitzers.
What does SoA mean?
Hasan had it printed on business cards he handed out while in the US Army.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.