Posted on 03/29/2014 2:08:56 PM PDT by DTA
That is not true, the rest is correct. Generally Kremlin propaganda is back to the old tricks, fascists/nazis, evil nationalists (when in fact the whole Putin's crew is a fascist mafia) financing Alex Jones kind of clowns and other media whores, NGOs (a lot of “green” nonsense in Europe is Kremlin backed, “natural gas is the best way to reduce CO2 emission” - until it is Russian of course, fracking ? God forbid !) spreading their agenda, supporting various radical movements, spreading disinformation via agents and useful idiots, divide and conquer tactic (also exploiting historical issues like UPA) and other “goodies”. Incredible how many people fall for this garbage.
The most shameful part came after the war, see "Operation Keelhaul".
So we finally know who should be blamed for WW2 ! Alex Jones told you that or is it FR Katsap squad's own initiative ?
AL was. Not AK.
Armia Ludowa really wasn’t a factor until Soviet Troops entered Polish territory in 1944.
Poland signed military agreements with both Britain and France in 1939 (which Britain and France hardly honored before it was too late), had a mutual assistance pact with France which dated to 1921 and signed a non-aggression pact with the Soviets in 1932. Where did Poland say no to them?
In 1938, however, Hitler invited Poland to sign the Anti-Comintern Pact, and THAT Poland did refuse.
What u sed
What u sed
The Nation magazine does not deal with "established facts". It's full of Communist lies.
If you’d like to be on or off, please FR mail me.
..................
Good morning. I went back & watched the first part of the Soviet Story again this morning. The first part goes into gruesome detail about the starvation the Soviets inflicted in Ukraine. As far as the Soviets & the Nazis, here’s the gist of it:
In 1924 when Hitler established the Nazi Party, it was obvious that there were only minor differences between it & communism. Since it wasn’t a big sell to the Germans, Hitler changed tactics and start emphasizing different things, but his internal circle understood that Nazism was basically Marxism. His was National Socialism, instead of international socialism.
After Hitler annexed Austria, & occupied Czechoslovakia,it became clear that he intended further assaults on Europe. Stalin refused to join an anti-Hitler coalition. In 1939 Stalin & Hitler signed a pact. Stalin was happy to let Hitler take the lead in destroying the old order in Europe, figuring he would come in after & take over. Stalin was willing to provide the Nazis with economic aid to allow Hitler to proceed with his war. When Hitler attacked Poland from the west, Stalin came in & attacked from the east. An act of aggression, not an attempt to help the Poles. Essentially they went to war together & divided the country between them. Justification: fighting ‘polish fascism’. But Stalin & Hitler had already agreed on more than Poland. In a secret protocol signed a week before the war started, they had agreed on how to divide Europe between them. The Soviets attacked Finland and then Norway. Soviet & Nazi officers often fraternized & discussed how the war was going. Soviets provided the raw materials that kept the Nazi war machine going. Soviet citizens were starving as food was being sent to the Germans. As the Germans continued westward, the Soviets attacked Lithuania & Estonia.
Then finally the worm turned & Hitler attacked the Soviets. But until then, the Soviets & the Nazis were allies, & one of the things they were allied to accomplish was to create the ‘new man’, which required killing off whichever population was deemed unacceptable. The Marxist started out intending those to be by class, but ended up like the Nazis, killing off ethnic populations.
Pretty gruesome history, & too few people are aware of the truth today.
Thank you very much.
Even fewer people are aware of the truth who financed the bloodthirsty Communist takeover of Russia in 1917,Nazi takeover of Germany in 1933 and buildup of Nazi war machine to make this gruesome history possible.
I don't believe documentary about this will ever be made. The answer could be found only in dusty books. "Follow the money" and "Follow the works of art" is the best lead.
So cryptic! ;-) Which works of art?
Here’s what I’m getting:
We’re sorry, the page that you requested could not be found.
Please retype the address you entered, or follow a link below to popular sections of our site:
1.Search the Collection
2.Planning a Visit
3.Current Exhibitions
4.Permanent Collection
5.NGA Classroom
6.NGA Kids
7.Gallery Shop
8.Press Office
9.Site Map
Please visit and bookmark our home page at www.nga.gov. If you need additional assistance, contact us via our Web feedback form .
It’s about time to go fix dinner. I’ll have to look into it more in the morning.
From the web site:
"His most spectacular purchases occurred in 1930-1931, when he acquired twenty-one paintings from the Hermitage Museum in Saint Petersburg, Russia. These included rare works by Jan van Eyck, Botticelli, and Titian as well as two Raphaels, four Anthony van Dycks, and five Rembrandts."
You have one name.
Andrew Mellon. I’ll have to do some research. Thanks!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.