Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Rasmussen Daily Presidential Tracking Poll: Obama 47 Romney 46 (W Leaners Tied 48-48)
Rasmussen Reports ^ | 09/28/2012 | Scott Rasmussen

Posted on 09/28/2012 6:50:03 AM PDT by nhwingut

The Rasmussen Reports daily Presidential Tracking Poll for Friday shows President Obama attracting support from 47% of voters nationwide, while Mitt Romney earns the vote from 46%. Three percent (3%) prefer some other candidate, and four percent (4%) are undecided. See daily tracking history.

Romney is supported by 86% of Republicans, while Obama gets the vote from 85% of Democrats. The GOP hopeful has a four-point edge among voters not affiliated with either major party.

When “leaners” are included, the race is tied at 48% apiece. Leaners are those who are initially uncommitted to the two leading candidates but lean towards one of them when asked a follow-up question. Beginning this Monday, October 1, Rasmussen Reports will be basing its daily updates solely upon the results including leaners.

(Excerpt) Read more at rasmussenreports.com ...


TOPICS: Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: 2012polls; polls
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-58 next last

1 posted on 09/28/2012 6:50:09 AM PDT by nhwingut
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: nhwingut

Who are the 14% of Reps voting for Obama???


2 posted on 09/28/2012 6:52:40 AM PDT by johncocktoasten (Practicing asymetrical thread warfare against anti-Palin Trolls)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nhwingut

That’s why it’s so important for voters in swing states to vote their conscience and vote for Gary Johnson.


3 posted on 09/28/2012 6:54:05 AM PDT by joesbucks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: johncocktoasten

The good news is Romney is leading with Indies.


4 posted on 09/28/2012 6:54:32 AM PDT by Perdogg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: joesbucks

Ah so you a Johnson supporter.


5 posted on 09/28/2012 6:55:48 AM PDT by Perdogg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: nhwingut

Things have been the same for days now. No movement at all.


6 posted on 09/28/2012 6:57:20 AM PDT by napscoordinator (GOP Candidate 2020 - "Bloomberg 2020 - We vote for whatever crap the GOP puts in front of us.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nhwingut

How in the Hell can the Marxist be so damn far ahead in the polls??? he should be -20!!

I think i need to start drinking more...


7 posted on 09/28/2012 6:58:08 AM PDT by wyowolf
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Perdogg

Yes. Romney is +4 with independents. This is a good sign. Obama has no path to victory without winning Indies. No Democrat has lost Indies and won election in last 30 years.

92 Clinton +6 Indies Won by 6
96 Clinton +8 Indies Won by 8
00 Gore -2 Indies Tied (Lost EV)
04 Kerry E Indies Lost by 3
08 Obama +8 Indies Won by 7

00 and 04 Dems did not win Indies and lost.


8 posted on 09/28/2012 6:58:14 AM PDT by nhwingut (Sarah Palin 12... No One Else)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: johncocktoasten
Who are the 14% of Reps voting for Obama???

A lot of them are here on FR. They hate Romney and say they're not voting.

9 posted on 09/28/2012 6:58:55 AM PDT by ladyjane
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: nhwingut
The Rasmussen Reports daily Presidential Tracking Poll for Friday shows President Obama attracting support from 47% of voters nationwide

47% for Obama?

Our country is sick. The people of this country are sick, or at least the 47% of the people who support Obama.

I guess it's no coincidence when you have 47% of the people who don't pay federal income tax and you have 47% of the people who support Obama.

And we even have a handful of freaks on this website who complain when you point out that 47% of the people of this country don't pay federal income tax and most of them vote for Obama, and high taxes for the rest of us.

10 posted on 09/28/2012 6:59:06 AM PDT by FreeReign
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: joesbucks

Why??? So we can have 4 more years of the pukehead we now have?????


11 posted on 09/28/2012 6:59:30 AM PDT by RightLady (Take out the trash Nov 6th)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: nhwingut

By my estimate after accounting for undecideds and others Romney up slightly 1-2 points. But swing states are what matter.


12 posted on 09/28/2012 6:59:53 AM PDT by BlueStateRightist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wyowolf

How in the Hell can the Marxist be so damn far ahead in the polls???

Ignorance!


13 posted on 09/28/2012 7:00:58 AM PDT by Bitsy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: wyowolf
How in the Hell can the Marxist be so damn far ahead in the polls???

He's up one. But it is frustrating to see him leading even now in Rasmussen after such a horrid week (Libya lies, bad economic data).
14 posted on 09/28/2012 7:01:27 AM PDT by nhwingut (Sarah Palin 12... No One Else)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind; LS; Perdogg; napscoordinator; God luvs America; Evil Slayer; nutmeg; SoFloFreeper; ...

It does appear then that Ras is using a significant dem oversample model.

If Romney leads by 4 with Indies and leads GOPers more than 0buma lead Rats, then this is a skewed poll.


15 posted on 09/28/2012 7:01:56 AM PDT by Perdogg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: nhwingut

This looks to me as if things are tilting ever so slightly Obama’s way. There’s still time; but I feel like team Romney is down a field goal and not a lot of time on the clock. They need an Elway-type drive to win it.


16 posted on 09/28/2012 7:02:52 AM PDT by Sans-Culotte ( Pray for Obama- Psalm 109:8)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Perdogg

what are the dem vs rep vs indy sample percentages?


17 posted on 09/28/2012 7:03:45 AM PDT by AdamBomb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: RightLady

Those people (conservatives not voting for Romney) are cowards. They claim to be brave defenders of principle over party, but in fact they are people who are afraid to choose sides anf back Romney because then they won’t be as hurt if Romney loses. Its a form of preemptive sour grapes. They can look back and say “Romney wouldn’t have been any better anyway).


18 posted on 09/28/2012 7:05:53 AM PDT by dinoparty
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: nhwingut

My focus isn’t even on the national poll. Now it comes down to the swing state. Ras daily Swing State poll is tied with Romney +1 with leaners 48-47. If history holds and undecideds break for Romney, he is sitting pretty good now.


19 posted on 09/28/2012 7:06:23 AM PDT by NoobRep
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AdamBomb

According to Dick Morris it is +2.5% Dem oversample, I think it may be higher.


20 posted on 09/28/2012 7:07:14 AM PDT by Perdogg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: wyowolf

Last night, I switched around various channels and saw Benjamin Netanyahu’s speech at the UN being mocked on Jon Stewart’s show. Stewart equated it to Wily E. Coyote and the sheep in the audience had piercing laughs. Too many people unaware. Too many people blissfully ignorant. They probably consider Stewart to be a source for news.


21 posted on 09/28/2012 7:07:41 AM PDT by ConservativeStatement (Obama "acted stupidly.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Perdogg
It does appear then that Ras is using a significant dem oversample model.

Either we have a lot more government teat feeders than we used to, OR Rasmussen is a fat-faced lying pollster like all the rest of them.

22 posted on 09/28/2012 7:07:55 AM PDT by FreeReign
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: NoobRep

I get that, but its highly likely that the swing state vote will track the national vote anyway.


23 posted on 09/28/2012 7:08:17 AM PDT by dinoparty
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: wyowolf

Obama’s not far ahead not up in the polls. It is tied.

That said, it is still shocking he is not down 10, but races always look close in the middle, so I doubt it has any relation to the outcome.


24 posted on 09/28/2012 7:08:36 AM PDT by ilgipper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: ConservativeStatement
Last night, I switched around various channels and saw Benjamin Netanyahu’s speech at the UN being mocked on Jon Stewart’s show.

Amazing, isn't it. Jon Stewart is Jewish.

25 posted on 09/28/2012 7:10:59 AM PDT by FreeReign
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: FreeReign
Perhaps I may have the wrong term but I think Stewart called Netanyahu “Bubbie” last night which I thought was a reference to grandmothers.
26 posted on 09/28/2012 7:16:03 AM PDT by ConservativeStatement (Obama "acted stupidly.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: joesbucks

Johnson is a communist.

Pray for America


27 posted on 09/28/2012 7:17:08 AM PDT by bray (If you vote for a communist what does that make you?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: NoobRep

When all is said and done I don’t think the results will have anything to do with gaffes, debates, or even the media.
The economy sucks no matter what is said. People feel that.
Plus I strongly believe that there are masses of people who will vote for Romney but just don’t want to talk about it because it makes them feel dirty.
I just got back from my annual Colorado vacation and there was twice as much anti Obama stuff as there was pro Romney stuff.
And the Obama and pro Romney comparison broke slightly in favor of Romney. That’s just anecdotal I know, but it is in stark contrast to what I saw four years ago.


28 posted on 09/28/2012 7:17:19 AM PDT by Clump ( the tree of liberty is withering like a stricken fig tree)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: ConservativeStatement

I have a solution for the John Stewart wathcing hipster 21-35 demographic. We need a surtax of $100 on the new iPhone as well as a surtax of %50 on all clothing sold at Abercrombie and Fitch and Hollister. That would wipe the smirk off their smarmy faces. They would get it then. Most hipsters live with their parents, on their health insurance, have some useless day job which they are free to spend their money on over priced mountain bikes, soy lattes at Starbucks and concert tickets to see Seether or the reunion of SoundGarden. That or like my ex Sis in Law hipster, they co-habitate with another drippy recent college grad, semi employed hipster in some faux marriage including the yappy dog which is their pseudo kid. They think they are so smart, trendy, hip and worldly, they worship that tool John Leibowitz.


29 posted on 09/28/2012 7:18:54 AM PDT by pburgh01
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: FreeReign

Leftist is his religion. Israel is a nice place for him to visit and claim himself a good Jew for doing so. This is the same concept as Jews who go to temple only on the high holidays. 90% of those Jews are voting for the Marxist.


30 posted on 09/28/2012 7:20:21 AM PDT by BlueStateRightist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: nhwingut
With Ryan supporting gays in the Military and Romney seemingly not in the race (I have to turn off the TV several times during the early evening due to obama ads on History and Discovery etc and NO Romney ads)... I am beginning to think that these polls are correct. WTF is wrong with Romney and Ryan? Even if the truth is that they are even... why are they not fighting about the things that are happening to them? Why do they allow lies and attacks to go unanswered? WHY?

LLS

31 posted on 09/28/2012 7:23:02 AM PDT by LibLieSlayer ("if it looks like you are not gonna make it you gotta get mean, I mean plumb mad-dog mean" J. Wales)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nhwingut
Romney is worrying me. Its late in the game, like 5 weeks to go, and he is making little headway. Obama has literally 4 years of record epic fail, especially on the economy. 44 plus months of record recession, record numbers of unemployment, a million and half less people working, AND yet Romney cant make any headway.

I'm sorry, but this nice guy approach is not working for him.

32 posted on 09/28/2012 7:26:10 AM PDT by KC_Conspirator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ilgipper

Mitt is running strong, and has room to close the election in the last few weeks.

But its not a surprise that he’s tied now. The fact is media corruption is far greater than its ever been.

Lets look at the election in 1980. Imagine for a moment if in 1980 the american voters did not know anything about the iranian hostage crisis, did not know the unemployment rate, did not know the true cost of the interest rates.... or the inflation rate numbers.

In 1980 the news media reported those facts, and people knew them.

Today’s media doesnt’ report those facts at all. And people have no idea of what Obama’s presidency is doing to the nation.


33 posted on 09/28/2012 7:26:37 AM PDT by o2bfree
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: nhwingut
The "dead heat" doesn't quite fit the media meme that Obama is surging ahead and that Romney is faltering.

We are now forty days out from the election. It is a good thing for a challenger to be in a dead heat at this point because the undecideds and leaners historically break for the challenger by at least 2-1 margin in final days. It is a very bad thing for the incumbent to be in a dead heat at this juncture. If the incumbent is not comfortably ahead at this point, then he hasn't made his case with the electorate.

Even better, Romney's campaign has not yet unleashed the full force of their campaign. They have evidently made the strategic decision to focus their efforts on the final weeks. Many of us are questioning that but I can only assume that Romney has some smart people on his staff who know what they are doing.

Many of us are also bemoaning the fact that we have a non-charismatic candidate who comes across as overly polite and genteel. However, those who remember the 1988 campaign will remember we had the same type of candidate back then but in the final weeks of the campaign, Dukakis was hit hard with the tank ads, the Willie Horton stuff, etc., and was beaten in a 40-state landslide. All through this, George HW Bush kept out of the fray, it was his attack dogs like Lee Atwater who did all the dirty work for him.

Hopefully Romney has some people like that waiting to be unleashed. We are going to need them.

34 posted on 09/28/2012 7:29:36 AM PDT by SamAdams76
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: o2bfree

Exactly. Bad economic news is reported as a “mixed message on the economy” while mixed economic news is reported as “good news” and good news is reported as “thanks to Obama.” And if all fails, blame Bush.


35 posted on 09/28/2012 7:31:50 AM PDT by nhwingut (Sarah Palin 12... No One Else)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: LibLieSlayer

During the halftime break between Washington vs Stanford football game last night, I saw an O ad accusing Romney of outsourcing jobs to China when he was the CEO at Bain. Powerful ad, and where was Romney counter attack on this ad... CRICKETS...A successful team tries to follow up on ads like those immediately the following commercial break. UNFORTUNATELY this game was seen by millions and the ad was indeed effective. BTW, my hubby is a football fanatic and see as much football games as possible and it seems that O has cornered that market very successful...that’s all I see is O ads during station breaks and NO ROMNEY ads...zip...nada..NOTHING!! Where is the fire in the belly from team R?? :(


36 posted on 09/28/2012 7:38:47 AM PDT by RoseofTexas
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: nhwingut

There is now an overwhelming body of evidence, poll’s, both skewed, and not, that Romney is in a slide. I have watched for this last week, all the damning news about terrorism in Libya, only lightly damage Obama, but more Importantly an almost “shy” Romney fail to gain any traction. The Ads are bland, his speaches, complex and maybe too far over the heads of the people his message must reach. Romney needs to kick it up a notch. NOW.


37 posted on 09/28/2012 7:48:23 AM PDT by swamprebel (a Constitution once changed from Freedom, can never be restored.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nhwingut

I went to the Rasmussen source page for this thread, and then browsed around a bit, ‘til I found this:
“The latest Rasmussen Reports telephone survey of Likely Ohio Voters shows the president earning 47% support to Romney’s 46%. Three percent (3%) like some other candidate, and another three percent (3%) are undecided.”

The critical Ohio race has tightened a bit in Romney’s favor, but I was wondering, just -who- are “the other candidates” there?

If the 3% for “other” holds, or if, say, 2% of those folks stick with “other” and don’t vote for either Obama or Romney, it looks like Ohio may be “won by plurality” this time, or a VERY close majority (the kind of numbers that invite fraud in the ‘rat districts).

Historically, undecideds break about 2-to-1 against the incumbent, so of the 3%, Obama gets 1% and Romney 2%. That would bump up Obama to 48%, and give Romney 48%.

It’s the 1% (from the “other’) that will make the difference. Whoever gets the majority of that, could win Ohio by a plurality, and it will be a CLOSE plurality.

Just speculatin’ with the numbers....


38 posted on 09/28/2012 7:51:36 AM PDT by Road Glide
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RoseofTexas
Romney should run ads showing the ceo of gm bragging on moving ALL operations to china and especially about moving the Cadillac R&D center from Flint to Beijing in 2013... ALL ON OUR TAX DIME!. He should call obama out as a liar... but oh no... Ryan has to embrace gays in the Military and Mitt has to call obama yesterday "a good guy who cares about America". These two guys better man-up or they are going to lose and we are going to lose the most!

LLS

39 posted on 09/28/2012 7:55:14 AM PDT by LibLieSlayer ("if it looks like you are not gonna make it you gotta get mean, I mean plumb mad-dog mean" J. Wales)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: SamAdams76

“Even better, Romney’s campaign has not yet unleashed the full force of their campaign. They have evidently made the strategic decision to focus their efforts on the final weeks. Many of us are questioning that but I can only assume that Romney has some smart people on his staff who know what they are doing”

Yep.

The General George McClellan strategy. Works every time!


40 posted on 09/28/2012 7:58:59 AM PDT by Road Glide
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: RoseofTexas
During the halftime break between Washington vs Stanford football game last night, I saw an O ad accusing Romney of outsourcing jobs to China when he was the CEO at Bain. Powerful ad, and where was Romney counter attack on this ad... CRICKETS...A successful team tries to follow up on ads like those immediately the following commercial break. UNFORTUNATELY this game was seen by millions and the ad was indeed effective. BTW, my hubby is a football fanatic and see as much football games as possible and it seems that O has cornered that market very successful...that’s all I see is O ads during station breaks and NO ROMNEY ads...zip...nada..NOTHING!! Where is the fire in the belly from team R?? :(

Same here. I see lots of Obama ads and none from R/R, even though they supposedly have more money. I've donated several times to Romney; but no more. He does not appear to use the money I send him.

41 posted on 09/28/2012 8:09:44 AM PDT by Sans-Culotte ( Pray for Obama- Psalm 109:8)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: nhwingut
Photobucket
42 posted on 09/28/2012 8:13:54 AM PDT by profit_guy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Road Glide
Historically, undecideds break about 2-to-1 against the incumbent, so of the 3%, Obama gets 1% and Romney 2%. That would bump up Obama to 48%, and give Romney 48%.

Thats on the low side too, from what I remember, its like 80%, or 4 to 1 that break for the incumbent. But let me check...

43 posted on 09/28/2012 8:17:08 AM PDT by KC_Conspirator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: Sans-Culotte

There is ample time. I feel much better today than I did on Monday. The polls are behind the reality of the situation — the continued MSM attempts to manufacture Romney “gaffes” are failing.

In fact, Romney is looking more and more resilient in the face of immense hostility. And his ad campaign has barely begun.


44 posted on 09/28/2012 8:23:44 AM PDT by mwl8787
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: mwl8787

Look at the #s for seniors, all of whom vote in disproportionate numbers, with Romney leading by 20 points.

In fact, Romney is leading in every age bracket 40 years old and higher.

No wonder Obama is now attempting to get young people to sway their parents and grandparents. Won’t work.


45 posted on 09/28/2012 8:26:40 AM PDT by mwl8787
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: nhwingut

That it’s even this close is depressing. Of course I said the same thing in 2000 and 2004.


46 posted on 09/28/2012 8:30:03 AM PDT by opus86
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Road Glide

I am correct

http://www.pollingreport.com/incumbent.htm


47 posted on 09/28/2012 8:31:17 AM PDT by KC_Conspirator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: Perdogg

Did you just call him a Jock Strap?


48 posted on 09/28/2012 8:39:37 AM PDT by KC_Conspirator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: KC_Conspirator

The “high interest” voters are also grouped in the 40+ brackets where Romney dominates. It’s a lot of good news.


49 posted on 09/28/2012 8:42:25 AM PDT by azcap (Who is John Galt ? www.conservativeshirts.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: nhwingut

Rasmussen must be using a bias toward democrats or he is polling very few independents then because Romney gets 1% more of party vote and +4 on independents.


50 posted on 09/28/2012 8:45:55 AM PDT by jwalsh07 (.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-58 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson