Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Roberts jokes about trip to 'impregnable' fortress
AP ^ | Jun 29, 3:10 PM EDT | JOE MANDAK

Posted on 06/29/2012 1:57:30 PM PDT by Alissa

FARMINGTON, Pa. (AP) -- U.S. Supreme Court Chief Justice John Roberts joked that he'll spend some time on an "impregnable island fortress" now that the court has ended a session that featured him casting the decisive vote to uphold President Barack Obama's health care law.

(Excerpt) Read more at hosted.ap.org ...


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Front Page News; Government; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: activist; activistjudge; roberts; taxandtax
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 121-123 next last
To: UCANSEE2
Obama is being hoisted by his own petard, and yet most seem to think Roberts should be hanged.

Misinformed public, is all I can say.

Er, what if Roberts voted to declare the whole thing unconstitutional like Kennedy et. al.?

Would we not be in a better position today?

Who is misinformed?

21 posted on 06/29/2012 2:16:03 PM PDT by JohnG45
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: RoseofTexas

That makes two of us!


22 posted on 06/29/2012 2:17:05 PM PDT by Monorprise
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Alissa

Oh how cute of Roberts.

Whatever

FUJR

FUBO


23 posted on 06/29/2012 2:17:18 PM PDT by GlockThe Vote (The Obama Adminstration: 2nd wave of attacks on America after 9/11)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dfwgator
He is traitor...like so many intellectual and over educated people; they are easily made tool for the darkness out of their “lofty” thinking that is really just from hell itself.
24 posted on 06/29/2012 2:20:06 PM PDT by fabian (" And a new day will dawn for those who stand long, and the forests will echo with laughter")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Alissa

Roberts is the darling of the lefties now. Just watch his beaming face as he listens to Obama’s State of the Union as his second term gets underway.


25 posted on 06/29/2012 2:20:06 PM PDT by madprof98
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Alissa
This is in no way a defense of John Roberts (or the SCUS in general) but shame on us (the citizens) for putting them in this situation.

We wouldn't even be dealing with this socialized medicine nonsense if we had elected enough congressmen and senators to stop this bill in its tracks.

We do still have the opportunity to overturn this monstrosity this November by throwing Obama out of office, ensuring that we maintain conservative control of the House and send at least 51 like-minded senators to the Senate.

We should not rely upon the SCUS to do our dirty work for us. Time to roll up our sleeves and get the job done ourselves this November. (I'd like to think this might have been the message Roberts was trying to send.)

26 posted on 06/29/2012 2:21:04 PM PDT by SamAdams76
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Alissa

With Rinos and Constitutional reimaginers I figured we need at least a 6 to 3 edge, but it would probably be safer with a 7 to 2 majority.


27 posted on 06/29/2012 2:23:54 PM PDT by I Drive Too Fast
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Olog-hai

Reading a CNN article on the same conversation, I got the impression that Roberts could careless about anyone’s rights, and that instead he simply issued this lawless and insanely convoluted edict so that he would APPEAR bipartisan.

Of course the fact that he then rushes off to a Mediterranean island resort only underscores his elite Washington apathy to our rights & constitution which he just stamped out with his jackboot.

I for one cannot help but admit to the hope that he never returns.


28 posted on 06/29/2012 2:24:34 PM PDT by Monorprise
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: UCANSEE2
ObamaCare passed. It may make for good politics on behalf of republicans but it is NOT conservatism nor is it good for America.

The silver lining you see is simply the border separating real conservatives from republicans.

We conservatives have been had. We lose credibility everytime we stand behind someone with our support declaring them to be conservative and they end up being a BIG government liberal and that loss is much bigger than if we had named him the RINO he really is but said we'd give him a chance.

You also seem to forget Robert's on Arizona a few days ago.

You still insist he is on our side?

We were worried about where Kennedy would stand and it was one of "our own" that gave it to Obama. Geez!

29 posted on 06/29/2012 2:25:39 PM PDT by tsowellfan (http://www.cafenetamerica.com/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Alissa

What happened??????????????????

30 posted on 06/29/2012 2:27:31 PM PDT by dragnet2 (Diversion and evasion are tools of deceit)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: I Drive Too Fast

“With Rinos and Constitutional reimaginers I figured we need at least a 6 to 3 edge, but it would probably be safer with a 7 to 2 majority.”

The corruption of power in Washington combined the a selection process & judgement that favor the same power makes it extremely unlikely that we could ever get or maintain a court respectful of anything but the self-indulgent powers of Washington D.C.


31 posted on 06/29/2012 2:28:07 PM PDT by Monorprise
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: SamAdams76

“We should not rely upon the SCUS to do our dirty work for us.”

OMG. That is probably one of the most retarded things I’ve seen posted. I don’t give a rat’s ass what was sent to SCOTUS. If it’s unconstitutional IT’S THEIR JOB to overturn it. And this was 100% unconstitutional.

Wouldn’t want to sully, the precious jurists by HAVING THEM DO THEIR JOBS now would we?

Freakin’ joke.


32 posted on 06/29/2012 2:29:17 PM PDT by Smokeyblue
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: Alissa

He was, as it were, stuned with a beeber, Fur Shur.


33 posted on 06/29/2012 2:31:39 PM PDT by muawiyah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Alissa

Oh wait, a new acronym...

F
U
J
R


34 posted on 06/29/2012 2:37:51 PM PDT by TheConservativeParty ("War." Andrew Breitbart)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Smokeyblue

I agree but shame on us for letting it pass in the first place. Citizens have a duty to protect the Constitution as well and in that respect, we also failed in our duty.


35 posted on 06/29/2012 2:38:59 PM PDT by SamAdams76
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: Smokeyblue
Besides, it is a liberal argument to expect the government to protect us from ourselves. Conservatives should know better. As citizens, it is our duty to elect representatives who will respect the Constitution and also our duty to throw them out when they fail in their duty.

In November, we shall have an opportunity to redeem ourselves.

36 posted on 06/29/2012 2:42:21 PM PDT by SamAdams76
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: Alissa

He’ll go down as another sorry-ass justice.

I have no respect for the man. He has no clue of the law.


37 posted on 06/29/2012 2:46:20 PM PDT by boycott (CAL)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SamAdams76

So does the SC and the elected Congress.


38 posted on 06/29/2012 2:47:18 PM PDT by freekitty (Give me back my conservative vote; then find me a real conservative to vote for)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: SamAdams76

“I agree”

I don’t think you actually do. You are worried about SCOTUS being forced to actually do their jobs.

And the 48% that pay the taxes did vote. They were out numbered by the 52%. Roberts just told us that if you don’t have the numbers well screw you. Who cares what the constitution actually says.

Slavery is unconstitutional. By yours and Roberts logic, congress could implement slavery for blacks again and because they only make up 13% of the population it is conceivable they would never be able to get the numbers in congress to undo it because they are a minority.

SCOTUS is there to rule whether laws are constitutional or unconstitutional according to the constitution. Dirty work my a$$. They get paid with benefits pretty well to do this dirty work, otherwise known as. their jobs.


39 posted on 06/29/2012 2:50:25 PM PDT by Smokeyblue
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: freekitty

Agreed. But it starts with us. We are the ones that put them in those positions.


40 posted on 06/29/2012 2:50:47 PM PDT by SamAdams76
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 121-123 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson