Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Here is an answer to the RUN Paul Iowa fiasco. It is probably being manipulated by the Democrats and the media as some of us suspected. If this drags Newt down on a national level, and we let them, then we are in dire trouble.
1 posted on 12/20/2011 6:23:05 AM PST by PSYCHO-FREEP
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: PSYCHO-FREEP

Gringrich is being dragged down by the weight of his own baggage, nothing else.


2 posted on 12/20/2011 6:27:01 AM PST by mac_truck ( Aide toi et dieu t aidera)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: PSYCHO-FREEP

3 posted on 12/20/2011 6:27:20 AM PST by humblegunner (The kinder, gentler version...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: PSYCHO-FREEP

Not to mention all the Paul operatives who are swarming Iowa. When this is allowed to happen, not election will be fair and honest.


4 posted on 12/20/2011 6:27:58 AM PST by PSYCHO-FREEP (If you come to a fork in the road, take it........)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: PSYCHO-FREEP

Anybody who panics the RINO Establishment can’t be all bad.


7 posted on 12/20/2011 6:30:04 AM PST by Burkean Buckleyite
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: PSYCHO-FREEP

Ron Paul will win Iowa ... then be out of the race in a month.


10 posted on 12/20/2011 6:33:03 AM PST by dartuser ("If you are ... what you were ... then you're not.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: PSYCHO-FREEP
No caucus should count for anything more than a straw poll.

It doesn't even represent the voters in the state, much less the nation. Iowa can switch to a real primary or be left out.

13 posted on 12/20/2011 6:35:45 AM PST by Beagle8U (Free Republic -- One stop shopping ....... It's the Conservative Super WalMart for news .)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: PSYCHO-FREEP; All
“It would make the caucuses mostly irrelevant if not entirely irrelevant,”

You've got that right. When Ron Paul is polling first in Iowa, it's time to make some other State the "first in the nation" and tell Iowa to go screw themselves. BTW, when was the last time any non-incumbent, Republican who won Iowa, got the nomination?
17 posted on 12/20/2011 6:43:36 AM PST by no dems (Why do you never see "Obama" bumper stickers on cars going to work in the morning?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: PSYCHO-FREEP

The Rino establishment brought this on themselves. They hate Newt so much, thinking their attacks would help Romney, instead they’re getting Paul since nobody wants Romney. So goes the old saying, be careful what you wish for. It’s kind of funny in a pathetic sort of way.


21 posted on 12/20/2011 6:46:05 AM PST by Proudcongal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: PSYCHO-FREEP

Ron Paul, “You give me money, I’ll build the ZOOOO!”


25 posted on 12/20/2011 6:49:43 AM PST by Tzfat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: PSYCHO-FREEP

What it shows is that Iowa is irrelevant. The miniscule state of New Hampshire is also irrelevant. Both are essentially media events.

South Carolina and Florida will indicate the actual trend


38 posted on 12/20/2011 7:06:09 AM PST by bert (K.E. N.P. +12 ..... Crucifixion is coming)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: PSYCHO-FREEP

I have a different perspective on this, and that is that if Paul wins Iowa then maybe that will cause a decent Republican to enter the race. That way we will not be stuck with a loose canon and crook like Newt!


45 posted on 12/20/2011 7:21:24 AM PST by Jay Redhawk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: PSYCHO-FREEP

Do you think that there is any point at which the “establishment” will conclude that the “Ron Paul Movement” is a real paradigm shift in the country? How many states will he have to win to convince the “establishment”?

My answer is: No number of states won will convince the “establishment” because they are so presuppositionally committed to the idea that that “Ron Paul can’t win” that they will never come to any other conclusion. A conclusion can never rise higher than its presupposition.


56 posted on 12/20/2011 7:46:05 AM PST by TIElniff (Autonomy is the guise of every graceless heart.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: PSYCHO-FREEP

In Madison’s Notes of the Federal Convention, it surprised me how often our Constitution’s architects expressed their concern about establishing a system where the voting masses were allowed to have too much power, due to the ignorance of most, and their ability to be easily swayed by the agenda of those desiring power.

The “Factions”, which ultimately became the Parties, and for most of our history merely two Parties, was also a grave concern to some Founders. The whole election process was seen as a weak link by some.

And then, of course, there were the Anti-Federalists . . . . . They lost.


65 posted on 12/20/2011 8:12:04 AM PST by dagogo redux (A whiff of primitive spirits in the air, harbingers of an impending descent into the feral.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: PSYCHO-FREEP

“Paul poses an existential threat to the state’s cherished kick-off status”

That kick-off status should also be on the table. The kick off should rotate to different regions of the nation. This process with Iowa and New Hampshire is designed to give momentum to leftist establishment GOP candidates, by using voting open to both parties.


71 posted on 12/20/2011 8:50:08 AM PST by DesertRhino (I was standing with a rifle, waiting for soviet paratroopers, but communists just ran for office)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson