New York Post Hacked; Anti-WikiLeaks Editorial Redirected to Dummy Site

Saturday, August 14, 2010 | Kristinn

[wardaddy]

Bill Casey woulda known how to handle this guy

[Sons of Union Vets]

Julian Assange apparently wants “transparency” for everyone else but not for himself.

For example, Wikileaks has been receiving help from Pirate Bay whose co-founder is a Swedish businessman Carl Lundstrom - one of the most notorious fascists in Europe. Lundstrom reportedly owns 40% of The Pirate Bay - the largest share.

This is interesting given the suspected involvement of Assange’s stepfather with the dangerous Australian cult called “The Family” (a.k.a. “The Great White Brotherhood,” a.k.a. Santiniketan Park Association).

The leader Anne Hamilton-Byrne claims to be a reincarnation of Jesus christ and bleached the hair of all of her “children.”

Assange won’t disscuss any ties he may or may not have had with the cult.

Here are some links you might find interesting.

http://spitfirelist.com/news/wikileaks-connected-to-swedish-nazi-milieu/

http://www.heraldsun.com.au/news/victoria/the-family-cults-secrets-exposed/story-e6frf7kx-1225761971443

http://www.theregister.co.uk/2009/02/26/pirate_bay_neo_nazi/

http://thenextweb.com/eu/2010/08/02/wikileaks-signs-up-to-pirate-bay-founders-online-tip-jar/

http://newteevee.com/2008/02/02/who-is-the-fourth-man-in-the-pirate-bay-case/
________________________________

http://www.heraldsun.com.au/news/victoria/the-family-cults-secrets-exposed/story-e6frf7kx-1225761971443

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Santiniketan_Park_Association

http://www.defamer.com.au/2010/06/the-strange-upbringing-of-wikileaks-founder-jullian-assange/

http://www.humanevents.com/article.php?id=38309

http://sixtyminutes.ninemsn.com.au/stories/peteroverton/259191/the-family

[bert]

Yes, you properly placed the horse before the cart.

[benjibrowder]

Somehow I think plummeting a few thousand feet without a parachute will ensure he “doesn’t remain above ground.”

[SunkenCiv]

Gosh, I can’t imagine. /sarc

Thanks AdmSmith.

[eleni121]

Well gee whiz...that’s not the reason.

I thought Australia was an ally. The Liar in chief has asked several countries to bring charges against Julie but according to the Aussies he has not.

http://www.smh.com.au/technology/technology-news/australia-not-asked-to-charge-wikileaks-chief-julian-assange-20100812-120ye.html

[conimbricenses]

If he broke Australian law in Australia, then charging him would be their prerogative. It’s not ours though, unless he comes here to the US and breaks one of our laws while visiting.

[eleni121]

Where have you been these past 20 or so years?

Since when has a nation’s prerogatives - independence, sovereignty, etc - been upheld by this country or anyone else. Not since the NWO decided that invading and holding and arresting and charging and imprisoning was the right of everyone else except the country in question.

No - Julie is safe as long as this administration holds the reins. Or as long as he continues to serve a useful purpose.

Your argument falls flat...very flat.

[conimbricenses]

The fact that we have a habit of trampling over other nations' sovereignty (See the IRS in Switzerland) does NOT mean that sovereignty does not exist. We're simply violating it, and going after Assange right now (as some on this forum are frothing at the mouth to do) would be another such violation.

Assange has not been arrested yet because he's been able to leverage the knowledge that he has more docs to dump along side the fact that he is not legally obliged to U.S. laws outside of the U.S. Even though we do regularly violate the sovereignty of other nations, we usually do so with at least a modicum of caution so as not to end up with egg all over our face. Sometimes it ends up there anyway. But my point is right now, Assange is far too public and still has too many cards against our government to make the violation of Australian sovereignty to arrest him a viable option at this time.