Posted on 11/17/2009 12:47:15 AM PST by XHogPilot
Are we at war -- or not?
For if we are at war, why is Khalid Sheikh Mohammed headed for trial in federal court in the Southern District of New York? Why is he entitled to a presumption of innocence and all of the constitutional protections of a U.S. citizen?
Is it possible we have done an injustice to this man by keeping him locked up all these years without trial? For that is what this trial implies -- that he may not be guilty.
And if we must prove beyond a reasonable doubt that KSM was complicit in mass murder, by what right do we send Predators and Special Forces to kill his al-Qaida comrades wherever we find them? For none of them has been granted a fair trial.
When the Justice Department sets up a task force to wage war on a crime organization like the Mafia or MS-13, no U.S. official has a right to shoot Mafia or gang members on sight. No one has a right to bomb their homes. No one has a right to regard the possible death of their wives and children in an attack as acceptable collateral damage.
Yet that is what we do to al-Qaida, to which KSM belongs.
We conduct those strikes in good conscience because we believe we are at war. But if we are at war, what is KSM doing in a U.S. court?
Enemy soldiers who commit atrocities are not sent to the United States for trial. Under the Geneva Conventions, soldiers who commit atrocities are shot when caught.
When and where did Khalid Sheikh Mohammed acquire his right to a trial by a jury of his peers in a U.S. court?
(Excerpt) Read more at realclearpolitics.com ...
Our enemies are at war.
Our enemies are very clear as to what their policies are.
KSM belongs in front of a military tribunal and a noose waiting for him.
Time is on their side FRiend :(
“KSM belongs in front of a military tribunal...”
Ditto that.
Quran Verse 9:123 - "Believers, make war on the infidels who dwell around you."
It's a religion of peace......it's a religion of peace....
Seems either Mecca or Medina would be the most appropriate place for Obama or some subsequent president to do that. Only they will not allow infidels to set foot in those two cities--which means Obama could get in perhaps not most of those in his entourage.
Maybe Geneva or at the UN in NYC perhaps. Heck, maybe we could sign the Instrument of Surrender and our promissory note to pay zakir to the Arabs for the next 500 years, right on the spot of the attacks, in that pit in the ground in lower Manhattan. How fitting.
Think how foolish any of us, liberal, moderate, coservative would have been to suggest such an insanity several days after September 11th? That we would gradually give up over a 8 or 9 year time frame period?
I guess when you deal with 2,000 year old societies with fanatics who want to die more than we want to live, and add a dash of President Obama, well, here we sit.
It’s a movement of S@it heads, who howl at the moon and blame their lack of intelligence upon everyone else. Oh ya, you can tell those POSs of Islam (including the fraud supreme Bobo) for me that I have never met an Islamist that could stand for themselves without blaming others for their fraud, Mohammed as Akmakinejad and the other POS’s of the middle east are nothing more than the tripe of pigs, and yes using the Koran as toilet paper will save trees...so much material here from the scum of the earth, why we bother with such; makes one wonder if the political class are either total cowards or in on the action.
You tell me: " the President is hereby authorized and directed to employ the entire naval and military forces of the United States and the resources of the Government to carry on war... and to bring the conflict to a successful termination, all of the resources of the country are hereby pledged by the Congress of the United states."
Are We at War or Not?
No we are not. Or at least not according to our Presidnt.
Of course the islamofacist that want to destroy our Nation and kill all of our people are at WAR with us.
Isn’t it fun to have an idiot as President?
Of course we’re at war. The enemy just happens to have captured the Oval Office.
12If thou shalt hear say in one of thy cities, which the LORD thy God hath given thee to dwell there, saying,
13Certain men, the children of Belial, are gone out from among you, and have withdrawn the inhabitants of their city, saying, Let us go and serve other gods, which ye have not known;
14Then shalt thou enquire, and make search, and ask diligently; and, behold, if it be truth, and the thing certain, that such abomination is wrought among you;
15Thou shalt surely smite the inhabitants of that city with the edge of the sword, destroying it utterly, and all that is therein, and the cattle thereof, with the edge of the sword.
16And thou shalt gather all the spoil of it into the midst of the street thereof, and shalt burn with fire the city, and all the spoil thereof every whit, for the LORD thy God: and it shall be an heap for ever; it shall not be built again.
Christianity was not always a "religion of peace".
My point in posting this is that quoting from the Quran can be matched by quoting from the Bible.
Religion, by itself, is neither good nor evil. It is what man does with it that makes it good or evil.
Of course were at war. The enemy just happens to have captured the Oval Office.
The president’s own explanation of why KSM is going to civil court was as nonsensical as it gets even calling him a war criminal and saying the civil trial will have “all the bells and whistles”(wtf?) of a military trial.
And if we must prove beyond a reasonable doubt that KSM was complicit in mass murder, by what right do we send Predators and Special Forces to kill his al-Qaida comrades wherever we find them? For none of them has been granted a fair trial.
A few months ago I saw four Warthogs flying overhead here in N. Tampa. Amazing and awe-inspiring aircraft, you are indeed fortunate to have piloted them. :)
This WH and their shadow admin are at war with America and The Constitution.
Sorry, Erik. This comparison does not stand. The quran is COMPLETE hate, perverse and twisted. Not one example or even a hundred examples in the Ancient Judaic or Christian Scriptures can compare to the all consuming hatred and incitement to murder in the quran. ALL of it. Hatred for every living thing that is not islam. Comparing ancient scripture to today is beyond the pale because along with war in the Bible, we are taught mercy and redemption. We are taught to value and cherish human life. There is no such virtue in the quran.
islam teaches that life has no value. Only death has value. And at the end, their perfect world is NO ONE and NOTHING left alive. That is their goal. It has never changed. And it never will.
Um, I hate to tell you, but Christianity tell you the same thing......life on earth is nothing compared to eternity in heaven with God.
Look, I am not getting into a urinating match over religion.
I don't blame firearms for evil....I blame the the person.
If you want to declare war on all of Islam, then you are declaring war on over 1.2 billion people.
I would rather focus on the fundamentalists among them and divide their ranks.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.