Posted on 10/22/2009 8:31:09 AM PDT by GodGunsGuts
The British Broadcasting Corporation in England has deemed it necessary to try and absolve Darwinism from any responsibility for the Holocaust and the many other atrocities committed in the name of evolutionary progress ever since Darwin published his Origin of Species in 1859. To achieve this, BBC2 produced a TV “documentary” entitled Darwin’s Dangerous Idea,[1] written and presented by their journalist and political commentator Andrew Marr. This 3-part series...
(Excerpt) Read more at creation.com ...
Coprophilia seems to be an issue for several of our resident YECs.
IIRC Adolph Eichmann indicated that he believed that he was bettering the human race by eliminating all the defectives.
So I guess the answer would be... yes.
We are all God’s chosen. We are all among God’s creations.
The truth comes out.
If one does not believe in lockstep with your very narrow views, they are not conservatives and must be purged.
I guess that most of the people on FR should be purged then?
Thank you, Jim. You get no argument from me on that score.
Go back and re-read my reply. And this time, read what it actually says, instead of what you want it to say.
Log, eye, splinter, self.
Too bad it doesn’t square at all with this statement:
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/2368427/posts?page=296#296
Not only does Darwin’s “theory” of evolution encourage the weeding out of so-called defectives, but it also has an outcome based morality other that has as its goal the survival of the most “favored” races. Of course, Darwin didn’t have the stomach to rigorously apply his atheistic theory across the board, but it doesn’t change the fact that the above is a direct consequence of his evo-atheist creation myth.
Log, eye, splinter, self.
How’d you do that?
I just did the same thing, and it said the following:
Could not find anybody named ‘<1/1’ (scripter, <1/1,000,000th%)
Could not find anybody named ‘000’ (scripter, <1/1,000,000th%)
Could not find anybody named ‘000th%’ (scripter, <1/1,000,000th%)
Here goes again without the commas.
Frankly, the only words that matter are “...that whosoever believeth in Him should not perish, but have everlasting life.”
not “whomsoever believeth in Genesis”
or “whomsoever believeth in Creation”
LOL! Sorry if I let the cat out of the bag :o)
"You have no idea what I do or don't understand. That is just another version of the liberal ad hominem "you just don't get it"."
You display no evidence of understanding the Scriptures by reasoning through the Holy Spirit, even after having it presented to you multiple times. This is at least the 3rd time I have told you this. You want to say that throwing out the Scriptures by the Holy Spirit is preferred by God and that doesn't work. Ever.
"I do understand, but do NOT accept Sola Scriptura. Your voluminous proselytizing tomes will not change that."
You even misrepresent Sola Scriptura as though it is limited to quoting Scripture. How many times did I tell you it is the Scriptures and reasoning through the Holy Spirit? 4 times now? How many times will you ignore reasoning through the Holy Spirit because it doesn't suit your opinion?
I have explained your error in thinking man was differentiated from animals through the 'gift' of the knowledge of good and evil, explained that Job's friends sinned by sitting in judgment on what God will or will not do (as you do), explained that Abraham received the gospel and believed God would raise Isaac from the dead, explained that a historical incident does not justify a contemporary crime and on and on and on.
And all you can do is pronounce it 'voluminous proselytizing'? The truth is that you proudly reject both Scripture and reason in order to sit in judgment on God's Word as though you are God's judge.
"A parrot can recite Scripture and a deaf man can hear the Holy Spirit but that doesn't mean they are communicating or agreeing to anything."
And a parrot or a deaf man could take what I have given you and have their mind opened. All you can do is repeat the same false accusation that has been demolished multiple times.
Corrected verson...sorry about that:
Not only does Darwin’s “theory” of evolution encourage the weeding out of so-called defectives, but it also has an outcome based morality that has as its goal the survival of the most “favored” races. Of course, Darwin didn’t have the stomach to rigorously apply his atheistic theory across the board, but it doesn’t change the fact that the above is a direct consequence of his evo-atheist creation myth.
Are you using semi colons or commas between names?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.