Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

WA: Referendum filed to repeal (national)popular vote law
Seattle P-I.COM ^ | 4/29/09

Posted on 04/29/2009 9:33:01 PM PDT by llevrok

OLYMPIA, Wash. -- A Shaw Island man has filed a referendum to repeal a new law that has Washington state join a compact with other states to cast its presidential electoral votes for the national popular vote winner.

David Anderson filed the referendum Wednesday, one day after Gov. Chris Gregoire signed the bill. The new law doesn't take effect until enough states sign on to account for 270 electoral votes - the number it takes to win the White House. Washington has 11 electoral votes. Anderson would have to gather more than 120,500 signatures by July in order to qualify for the ballot.

The compact has been ratified in Hawaii, Illinois, Maryland and New Jersey and is moving ahead in several other states.


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; US: Washington
KEYWORDS: electoralcollege; electoralvote; electoralvotes; nationalpopularvote; vote
signed into law today (Washington state), now a referundum filed against it.
1 posted on 04/29/2009 9:33:02 PM PDT by llevrok
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: sionnsar

WA Ping


2 posted on 04/29/2009 9:33:33 PM PDT by llevrok (A feral conservative in my own land.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: llevrok

So let me get this straight, the dumbasses in Washington have a new law that says all of Washington’s electoral votes go to the clown who wins the most votes NATIONALLY? ROTFL! Funny stuff. “Americans” are such an ignorant lot. Always shooting themselves in the foot. Why should anyone in Washington even bother to vote?


3 posted on 04/29/2009 9:41:18 PM PDT by FlingWingFlyer (Proud charter member of Napolitano's rightwing, nutcase American, watch list.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: llevrok

These laws deny the people of their state a voice in the Electoral College by declaring that no matter what electors the voters choose they would send the ones of the national popular vote winner instead.


4 posted on 04/29/2009 9:44:26 PM PDT by GeronL (TYRANNY SENTINEL. http://tyrannysentinel.blogspot.com LIBERTY FICTION at libertyfic.proboards.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: llevrok

Let me get this straight. A state votes for candidate A but, because candidate B wins the popular vote, the state is REQUIRED to vote for candidate B? Democracy and representative government is dead in the USA. Last freedom lover out, please slam the door...


5 posted on 04/29/2009 9:49:00 PM PDT by April Lexington (Study the constitution so you know what they are taking away!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: FlingWingFlyer
Actually, the way the polls dominate election coverage, just do the polls and swear in the Democrats. Why bother going through the motions?
6 posted on 04/29/2009 9:50:17 PM PDT by April Lexington (Study the constitution so you know what they are taking away!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: April Lexington

a suicide pact


7 posted on 04/29/2009 9:52:45 PM PDT by HiTech RedNeck (Beat a better path, and the world will build a mousetrap at your door.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: HiTech RedNeck

Maybe one day we’ll be “treated” to a 50 state recount. That ought to be fun.


8 posted on 04/29/2009 9:54:56 PM PDT by Chet 99
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: llevrok
Bump for Mr. Anderson's referendum!

California has been trying to pass this same garbage. I suspect that Arnold will sign it before he leaves office. Tom Campbell, one of our "Republican" gubernatorial candidates for 2010, has been involved trying to push this on a national level. I hope Washington is successful in killing this law.

9 posted on 04/29/2009 10:13:11 PM PDT by calcowgirl (RECALL Abel Maldonado! - NO on Props 1A 1B 1C 1D 1E 1F)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: llevrok

When the states don’t think that the states should have any voice in the nation where can you turn? When even purely selfish motives cannot serve any longer I just cannot think we have much to look forward to as a country or a people.


10 posted on 04/29/2009 10:34:38 PM PDT by cothrige (Ego vero Evangelio non crederem, ni si me catholicae Ecclesiae commoveret auctoritas.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: April Lexington
and all of this can happen by the hand of a Governor signing it into law? Or did the ignoramuses vote for this? Doubt very much the latter.
11 posted on 04/30/2009 12:34:48 AM PDT by GOP Poet
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Libertina; sportutegrl; kayti; narses; Avid Coug; RedinaBlue; trustandhope; SoldierMedic; ...
Thanks to llevrok for the ping.

Photo Sharing and Video Hosting at Photobucket
Say WA? Evergreen State ping

Quick link: WA State Board

FReepmail sionnsar if you want on or off this ping list.

Ping sionnsar if you see a Washington state related thread.

12 posted on 04/30/2009 8:20:14 AM PDT by sionnsar ((Iran Azadi | 5yst3m 0wn3d - it's N0t Y0ur5 (SONY) | "Also sprach Telethustra" - NonValueAdded)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: llevrok
"....a new law that has Washington state join a compact with other states to cast its presidential electoral votes for the national popular vote winner."

How the h*ll do they get by with this?

Lets hope David Anderson get the 120,500 signatures he needs by July to be able to stop this.

13 posted on 04/30/2009 8:54:46 AM PDT by Spunky (Quit breathing! You are causing global warming.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Spunky

Is there a place where we can print copies to collect signatures? I’d like to get started right away.


14 posted on 04/30/2009 11:24:36 AM PDT by beelzepug (OFA (ofay) had best stay away.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: beelzepug
"Is there a place where we can print copies to collect signatures?"

I know of no place.

15 posted on 04/30/2009 12:18:11 PM PDT by Spunky (Quit breathing! You are causing global warming.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: llevrok

It’s occurred to me that there might be an argument to be made that that this compact could be unconstitutional.

In order for the NPV compact to be valid and binding under the Compacts Clause of Art 1, Sec. 10 of the Constitution, it has to be approved by Congress. Congress’s approval, however, would essentially be an act undermining the method of electing the President outlined in Art II, Sec. 1. It’s a bit thin, but might be worth fleshing out.


16 posted on 05/01/2009 10:48:54 AM PDT by The Pack Knight (Duty, Honor, Country)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson