Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Hubble Finds a Mystery Object (something that astronomers cannot make any sense of)
Sky And Telescope ^ | 9/11/08

Posted on 09/15/2008 11:47:36 AM PDT by LibWhacker

Don't get the idea that we've found every kind of astronomical object there is in the universe. In a paper to appear in the Astrophysical Journal, astronomers working on the Supernova Cosmology Project report finding a new kind of something that they cannot make any sense of.

Now you don't see it, now you do. Something in Bootes truly in the middle of nowhere — apparently not even in a galaxy — brightened by at least 120 times during more than three months and then faded away. Its spectrum was like nothing ever seen, write the discoverers, with "five broad absorption bands between 4100 and 6500 Angstroms and a mostly featureless continuum longward of 6500 Angstroms." Even the cause of the spectral features is unknown. K. Barbary and othersThe project used the Hubble Space Telescope to monitor very distant galaxy clusters for supernovae. On February 21, 2006, in the direction of a far-away cluster in Bootes named CL 1432.5+3332.8 (redshift 1.112, light travel time 8.2 billion years), Hubble began seeing something brighten. It continued brightening for about 100 days and peaked at 21st magnitude in two near-infrared colors. It then faded away over a similar timescale, until nothing was left in view down to 26th magnitude. The object brightened and faded by a factor of at least 120, maybe more.

The mystery object did not behave like any known kind of supernova. It is not even in any detectable galaxy. "The shape of the light curve is inconsistent with microlensing," say the researchers. They recorded three spectra of it — and its spectrum, they write, "in addition to being inconsistent with all known supernova types, is not matched to any spectrum in the Sloan Digital Sky Survey database" of vast numbers of objects. "We suggest that the transient may be one of a new class."

What's its distance? That would certainly be a first step to figuring it out, but only the broadest constraints can be put on its distance. Its lack of parallax motion means that it can't be closer than about 130 light-years, and a lack of cosmic hydrogen absorption in its spectrum means that it can't be farther than 11 billion light-years (when "distance" is defined by light travel time). That leaves a lot of leeway.

Here is the group's paper with all the details. The lead author is Kyle Barbary (University of California at Berkeley).


TOPICS: Miscellaneous; Technical
KEYWORDS: astronomy; catastrophism; finds; haltonarp; hubble; mystery; object; science; stringtheory; xplanets
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 141-143 next last

Now you don't see it, now you do. Something in Bootes truly in the middle of nowhere — apparently not even in a galaxy — brightened by at least 120 times during more than three months and then faded away. Its spectrum was like nothing ever seen, write the discoverers, with "five broad absorption bands between 4100 and 6500 Angstroms and a mostly featureless continuum longward of 6500 Angstroms." Even the cause of the spectral features is unknown.

1 posted on 09/15/2008 11:47:36 AM PDT by LibWhacker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: LibWhacker

Maybe a rip in the fabric of space. Is Spock sporting a beard these days?


2 posted on 09/15/2008 11:50:35 AM PDT by swain_forkbeard (Rationality may not be sufficient, but it is necessary.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LibWhacker

Cool! Thanks for the link.


3 posted on 09/15/2008 11:50:46 AM PDT by TheWasteLand
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LibWhacker

Cool...maybe someone on a distant world fired up one of those haldron super-collider thingies....


4 posted on 09/15/2008 11:51:01 AM PDT by spokeshave (Obama wants to kill babies and raise taxes, Sarah wants to raise babies and kill taxes (also moose))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LibWhacker

It was the Moties firing their Crazy Eddie retro rockets!


5 posted on 09/15/2008 11:51:03 AM PDT by Dr. Bogus Pachysandra ("Don't touch that thing")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LibWhacker

ping for later


6 posted on 09/15/2008 11:51:05 AM PDT by advertising guy ( CHARITY BEGINS AT HUT !)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: KevinDavis

Ping!


7 posted on 09/15/2008 11:51:14 AM PDT by Army Air Corps (Four fried chickens and a coke)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LibWhacker
Probably a new type of supernova. That would make for a very massive star that exploded and we saw its light only for a brief while before it faded. That happened 11 billion years ago and we just saw it. The earth and our solar system did not then exist.

"Show me just what Mohammed brought that was new, and there you will find things only evil and inhuman, such as his command to spread by the sword the faith he preached." - Manuel II Palelologus

8 posted on 09/15/2008 11:52:09 AM PDT by goldstategop (In Memory Of A Dearly Beloved Friend Who Lives In My Heart Forever)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dr. Bogus Pachysandra

That’s awesome! Man that brings back some memories. I really enjoyed that book as a kid.


9 posted on 09/15/2008 11:52:56 AM PDT by thecabal (Conservatives who don't live up to the liberal caricature are now hypocrites.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: LibWhacker
It continued brightening for about 100 days and peaked at 21st magnitude in two near-infrared colors. It then faded away over a similar timescale, until nothing was left in view down to 26th magnitude. The object brightened and faded by a factor of at least 120, maybe more.

Barack's star no doubt.....

10 posted on 09/15/2008 11:52:58 AM PDT by A.Hun (Common sense is no longer common.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LibWhacker
brightened by at least 120 times during more than three months and then faded away.

Barack Obama's star power?
11 posted on 09/15/2008 11:53:18 AM PDT by Question Liberal Authority (Pontius Pilate voted "Present")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: swain_forkbeard

“Maybe a rip in the fabric of space. Is Spock sporting a beard these days?”

Extremely obscure South Park reference noted.


12 posted on 09/15/2008 11:53:24 AM PDT by Buck W. (If you push something hard enough, it will fall over.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: LibWhacker

Maybe a planet with Amazon women?


13 posted on 09/15/2008 11:53:30 AM PDT by Perdogg (Sen Robert Byrd - Ex community organizer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dr. Bogus Pachysandra

Bravo for the obscure reference to one of the greatest scifi books ever!


14 posted on 09/15/2008 11:53:49 AM PDT by neodad (USS Vincennes (CG 49) "Freedom's Fortress")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: LibWhacker

Just an old alien cursing along with her left turn signals left on..


15 posted on 09/15/2008 11:54:08 AM PDT by mnehring (Maverick/Barracuda 2008)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LibWhacker
Its spectrum was like nothing ever seen, write the discoverers, with "five broad absorption bands between 4100 and 6500 Angstroms and a mostly featureless continuum longward of 6500 Angstroms."

Image Hosted by ImageShack.us
16 posted on 09/15/2008 11:54:14 AM PDT by cripplecreek (Voting Conservative isn't for the faint of heart.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: A.Hun

LOL. Now he is just a dim bulb in the firmament.


17 posted on 09/15/2008 11:54:46 AM PDT by kabar (.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Dr. Bogus Pachysandra

I loved those two books!

Ed


18 posted on 09/15/2008 11:54:49 AM PDT by Sir_Ed
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: LibWhacker; NormsRevenge; SunkenCiv; Fred Nerks

Zowie....this could get to be an interesting thread.


19 posted on 09/15/2008 11:55:00 AM PDT by Ernest_at_the_Beach (No Burkas for my Grandaughters!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LibWhacker

In celebration of George Takei’s wedding?


20 posted on 09/15/2008 11:56:31 AM PDT by theDentist (Qwerty ergo typo : I type, therefore I misspelll.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 141-143 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson