Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

If McCain wins the nomination, will you support him?
01.09.08 | perdogg

Posted on 01/09/2008 8:11:46 AM PST by Perdogg

1) Vote for McCain

2) Vote Dims - Kevorkian vote

3) Don't vote

4) Third party?


TOPICS: Politics/Elections; Your Opinion/Questions
KEYWORDS: 2008; elections; marines; mccain; nh2008; vanity
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 341-360361-380381-400 ... 1,061-1,076 next last
To: jrd

I won’t vote for McCain.

The only one worse is Huckabee.


361 posted on 01/09/2008 9:05:55 AM PST by rurgan (socialism doesn't work. Government is the problem not the solution to our problems.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 357 | View Replies]

To: Perdogg

I’m not sure who I detest more, Huckabee or McCain. Could not vote for either. Would prefer Hunter or Thompson. Might be able to vote for Romney if I absolutely had to.


362 posted on 01/09/2008 9:05:56 AM PST by DFG
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Perdogg

Third party, unless he promises to serve only one term and picks a very exceptional VP who can carry the conservative mantle, like Fred Thompson or Mark Sanford. At least then there is hope for the future.


363 posted on 01/09/2008 9:06:07 AM PST by Texas Federalist (Taxes get so depressed when they hear Fred Thompson is in charge that they cut themselves.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Perdogg

Does it occur to any of the “hell no” voters that if Hillary or Obama get in along with a democrat congress, the rules will be changed so as no “true blue conservative” will ever have a chance at it again? How will you get your gospel out if talk radio and the Internet are forced to go by the Fairness Doctrine? What if the Electoral College is abolished?

If you can’t get your version of conservativism elected against Hillary, you won’t have a prayer (pun intended) after she and her Congress enact election “reform.” McCain-Feingold will look like true freedom.


364 posted on 01/09/2008 9:06:15 AM PST by BuckyKat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Perdogg
Republicans don't get my vote by default.

They have to earn it. McCain hasn't earned it. Instead he has earned my disgust.

365 posted on 01/09/2008 9:06:23 AM PST by Tolkien (There are things more important than Peace. Freedom being one of those.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Perdogg

I wouldn’t have a particular problem voting for McCain. I’d probably prefer him to Huckabee. I’d certainly prefer him to Romney.

Ranking the frontrunners ...

(1) Thompson - most clear and consistent conservative among the frontrunners.
(2) Giuliani - despite his clear flaws, he seems rock-solid on foreign policy ... and, even though I disagree sometimes, I know where he stands. I have a feeling he’d be more conservative as President, with true conservatism as a prevalent ideology in the U.S., and virtually extinct in NY.
(3) McCain - a little wishy washy, some weird policy stances, and I hate his bizarre focus on special interests. But, generally conservative (with obvious exceptions), an honorable and good man, and would likely be a reasonably good President.
(4) Huckabee - a good man. A good Christian. A populist - not a conservative.
(5) Romney - for some reason, I just get the feeling Romney is telling me what I want to hear, rather than what he actually believes. He comes off as rehearsed, plastic, and disingenuous. I don’t get that feeling with the others.

H


366 posted on 01/09/2008 9:06:26 AM PST by SnakeDoctor (How 'Bout Them Cowboys!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Perdogg
I've been struggling with this question myself.

On the one hand, beats having a Dem in office (maybe... he seems awfully cozy with them and they seem to like him too much for my comfort).

OTOH, my greatest fear is that a win by McCain will signal to the GOP that this is the kind of candidate we want in the future or give them the misguided assumption that they can pawn a less conservative candidate off on us and we'll vote for them anyway.

Does this make any sense at all? Am I looking at this all wrong? *blush*

367 posted on 01/09/2008 9:06:33 AM PST by nodumbblonde
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Perdogg
I'll vote for every other office on the ticket with the exception of the president, if that's the case.
Voting for McHillary is the same as voting democrat, I can never pull a lever for a democrap, so I can't pull if for John McHillary
368 posted on 01/09/2008 9:06:36 AM PST by jrg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: HangnJudge

I’d have to hold my nose and vote for him as well.
Two things we need to remember.
#1 Ross Perot got us Bill Clinton. I won’t make that mistake again.
#2 The political process has changed dramatically in the last decade. Thank you Algore for inventing the internet. President Bush and our Republican congress critters found that out when they tried to push amnesty this year. We were able to get educated via the internet and talk radio and we pushed back...with authority. We have a lot more power now than before. It is easier for us now to push back at our own when they try to do something we don’t like.


369 posted on 01/09/2008 9:07:59 AM PST by rickomatic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Grunthor
How about those that would vote for a back-stabbing RINO?

RINOs are better than Democrats...in McCain's case because he's pro-military and pro-life; in Giuliani's case because he's pro-Israel, pro-tax cuts and pro-War On Terror; in Huckabee's case because he's pro-life, and in Romney's case, because he's converted to a pro-life stance and is pro-business. Of course, my choice Fred Thompson isn't a RINO at all and he's the pick of this crop.

There's always a reason to vote for the person with the most conservative positions on the most issues who is capable of winning...that would be either the Republican or the Democrat when it comes to presidential primaries and general elections.

370 posted on 01/09/2008 9:08:06 AM PST by Chunga (Fred Thompson '08)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 171 | View Replies]

To: MplsSteve

I can’t even vote in this poll.


371 posted on 01/09/2008 9:08:29 AM PST by my right
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: rurgan

I won’t vote for him either!


372 posted on 01/09/2008 9:08:50 AM PST by jrd
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 361 | View Replies]

To: Perdogg

If he wins the nomination then yes...what choice do we have?


373 posted on 01/09/2008 9:09:18 AM PST by Vanbasten
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Perdogg

Yes McCain. Hold nose, close eyes, cross fingers, jump backwards three times chanting “Kyrie eleison.”


374 posted on 01/09/2008 9:09:23 AM PST by Mrs. Don-o (And Allah fubar.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: West Coast Conservative

He’s not my candidate, but yes, I will (after swearing I wouldn’t of course), but in the end, I will not stay home and I will vote Republican, that’s the reality on the ground.


375 posted on 01/09/2008 9:09:24 AM PST by Scythian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Perdogg
I vote for McCain. That's a no-brainer. The war is still the most important issue, and aside from his reluctance to use serious interrogation techniques on terrorist prisoners, he's on the right side of that issue.

Also, those of you who think four years of Hillary or Obama will give us better chances of electing a conservative in 2012 need to think again. Four years of Bill Clinton got us Bob Dole as the nominee and another four years of Bill Clinton. That was even though Republicans were in a stronger position in 1996 than we are today.

I know a lot of people think McCain, or Giuliani, or Romney, would be no better than Hillary or Obama. I happen to disagree, but that's your prerogative.

However, we do need to be honest with ourselves about what a Hillary or Obama victory means for the GOP. There's plenty of evidence to suggest that it would move the GOP to the left, not to the right. There is no guarantee that the conservative cause will gain any strategic benefit from electing a liberal Democrat as opposed to a moderate Republican.

The way I see it, there's too much at stake right now to play political games with our country's future. I'll take a moderate Republican who will fight our enemies aggressively over any of the Democrats. It may be possible that four years of a Democrat President might bring the GOP to its senses, but can we afford those four years right now? bin Laden will not be taking four years off, and neither should we.
376 posted on 01/09/2008 9:09:36 AM PST by The Pack Knight (Duty, Honor, Country.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LibLieSlayer

“Apparently not any longer... and I’m beginning to wonder how many Conservatives are left on FR.”

Judging by how many would vote for a lib with an R to keep out a lib with a D....I dunno.

These kind of compromisers must believe that it is entirely possible to, without dirtying oneself, pick up a turd by the “clean end.”


377 posted on 01/09/2008 9:09:39 AM PST by Grunthor (Soon to be a major religion.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 342 | View Replies]

To: KodakKing

Yep.


378 posted on 01/09/2008 9:10:12 AM PST by Sensei Ern (http://www.myspace.com/reconcomedy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 283 | View Replies]

To: BlueHorseShoe
I agree with you: I do not think that John McCain will ultimately win the Republican nomination, and I base that on roughly 40 years of political observation (for whatever that's worth!) The major candidates have strong regional - but not national - bases of support: Huckabee in the Southeast; McCain in the Northeast and Southwest; Romney in the East and Midwest; Guiliani in Florida and California. It would not at all surprise me to get through May or June without any of these candidates having amassed a majority of delegates.

Then there's the wild card: Fred Thompson. He's the only candidate with a national (but shallow, so far) base of support. If we get into the summer without a clear consensus Republican candidate, I think a "dark horse" will try to make a move. It might be Fred, or it might be someone completely out of the game right now. Fasten your seat belt. ;-)

379 posted on 01/09/2008 9:10:18 AM PST by andy58-in-nh (Kill the terrorists, secure the borders, and give me back my freedom.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 306 | View Replies]

To: Chunga

“RINOs are better than Democrats”

I disagree, thank God for that pesky old 1st amendment that Juan McCain urinates upon.


380 posted on 01/09/2008 9:10:40 AM PST by Grunthor (Soon to be a major religion.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 370 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 341-360361-380381-400 ... 1,061-1,076 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson