Posted on 04/21/2007 6:42:25 PM PDT by Jim Robinson
My conscience is fine, ex-freeper. I’ll sleep tonight secure in the knowledge that I did my duty to do what I could to fight against those who despise life and liberty.
I respectfully disagree.
Remember, the people did not legalize abortion, and it is therefore not their hearts that must change.
In comparison to slavery, abortion will be much simpler to "un-legalize," since it exists only by virtue of judicial lunacy rather than actual law. Involving the states in this question is both unnecessary and unconstitutional.
We are united states for the purposes outlined in the Preamble. What we need is an executive who understands that fact, the way Lincoln understood it.
Thank you for viewing that crap hole, so we don’t have to. Your sacrifice does not go unnoticed.
In some states, yes. In my fair state of Alabama it will take one election cycle at most to kick the baby-killing reprobates and their gruesome "clinics" clean across the border.
Is that how the Margaret Sangerites made it possible to off 50 million American babies? They won hearts? I don't think so.
Funny how you can’t prove the accusations you’re bandying about, huh?
You’ve done a great job here yourself. Keep up the great work!
I just noticed your tagline—hilarious!! LOL!
But 71% of Americans want abortion kept legal in some form.
In-N-Out Burgers or FatBurgers?
McDonald's for Fries or Burger King?
Taco Bell or El Pollo Loco?
For the record, I am not one of them...but that's a fact. Therefore hearts WILL have to be changed if you want Roe v. Wade overturned.
If I had my way, the government would be too darned small to do anything about any kind of lifestyle at all. Too small to promote them (no public schools, no "affirmative action"). Too small to financially support them (no marriage tax benefit, because no income taxes). And yes, too small to punish them either, unless they caused provable harm to other citizens.
Less filling, or tastes great?
Then let them change the Constitution.
I've got news for you. They won't.
“EV also failed to mention that hes a lobbyist for the state of Idaho, working to abolish state taxes,”
I hope that is true, that is very cool. I hope we have some anti-tax guys from every state.
I can prove it. Many people saw the original link before the thread was pulled at WA and many people, myself included, copied the thread before it was pulled. Why don't you go directly to the source and ask Merry? She posts with you over at WA. She knows there is proof and she can't deny it.
Oh, I just saw that Merry is still a poster here. We can ping her to the thread to deny it.
While Jim lists Thompson and Hunter as his top picks, he has ruled out Rudy Giuliani and will not support or vote for Rudy. Same goes for me.
You on the other hand would gladly support and vote for Rudy if he became the GOP nominee. Your own words speak for themselves.
>>>>>Do not try to imply that because I would vote for Giuliani as a LAST RESORT ...... ~~~ Chena LINK
>>>>>However, when push comes to shove and the Republican candidate is chosen in the primaries, I WILL support that candidate with everything I've got. ~~~ Chena LINK
I see you've also signed up at the newest anti-FReeper website. #205 hehehehehehehe
Yes, it’s always best to save things like that, and get others to save them too, before mentioning them. Good job.
I assume this means that you want the President to issue an EO banning abortions nationwide.
(please restate if I'm wrong)
Is there any recognized Presidential candidate who is committed to doing this? Would you vote only for such a candidate?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.