Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Earliest European 31,000 Years Old
ABC News/AFP ^ | 5-19-2005 | AFP

Posted on 05/19/2005 2:44:29 PM PDT by blam

Earliest European 31,000 years old

Agençe France-Presse
Thursday, 19 May 2005

Radiocarbon dating of human remains found in the Czech Republic has confirmed they come from the oldest European found so far (Image: iStockphoto)

Fossilised human bones found in the Czech Republic have been dated back to some 31,000 years, which scientists say confirms them as the oldest known examples of Homo sapiens found in Europe.

Austrian and US scientists publish their carbon-dating results in today's issue of the journal Nature.

An upper jaw, teeth and the skull of a female were found in a cave in Moravia in the 19th century, but scientists have debated how old they are.

University of Vienna researcher Dr Eva Wild and colleagues used a technique called accelerator mass spectrometry to analyse carbon 14 isotopes in the dental remains.

These isotopes decay at a known rate, allowing scientists to calculate the age of a dead organism.

Wild's team suggests the teeth are about 31,000 radiocarbon years old, a yardstick that can be somewhat different from calendar years.

Radiocarbon years and calendar years tend to diverge and converge at different periods in prehistory, consistent with varying amounts of carbon 14 in the atmosphere.

The discrepancy is significant during this period in prehistory, and calibrating radiocarbon and calendar years is a matter of ongoing research.

How does this relate to Neanderthals?

The fossil's age, as calculated in this latest research, concurs with artefacts from other sites in Europe that have been carbon-dated to the same era.

The finding is important, because it could help solve the mystery of what happened to the Neanderthals, a species of hominid that predominated in Europe before anatomically modern man showed up.

One school of thought suggests the Neanderthals were wiped out by the smarter H. sapiens or lost the battle for food and habitat, then simply faded away.

But another theory suggests the two hominid species lived side by side for many thousands of years and may have intermingled, which implies there could be Neanderthal genes in the human gene pool today.


TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: 31000; archaeology; earliest; europeans; ggg; godsgravesglyphs; history; old; years
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-44 next last

1 posted on 05/19/2005 2:44:31 PM PDT by blam
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: SunkenCiv
GGG Ping.

Neanderthal And Humans Shared Cave

"The finding, primarily based on analysis of fossil remains, confirms earlier speculation that Neanderthals and humans competed with carnivores for food and prehistoric real estate."

It also strengthens the link between humans and Neanderthals, suggesting they did socialise and interbreed, despite some DNA evidence to the contrary.

2 posted on 05/19/2005 2:48:10 PM PDT by blam
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blam

If it is a female, I'm sure Bill Clinton is interested.


3 posted on 05/19/2005 2:51:17 PM PDT by Paleo Conservative (Hey! Hey! Ho! Ho! Andrew Heyward's got to go!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blam
A single cave in France was home to Neanderthals, modern humans, and hyenas at roughly the same time 40,700 years ago, according to a new study.

Nothing that isn't going on in modern-day San Francisco.

4 posted on 05/19/2005 2:52:47 PM PDT by Mr Ramsbotham (Laws against sodomy are honored in the breech.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: blam

Oh no, not more posts of that old D.C. reporter!


5 posted on 05/19/2005 2:54:54 PM PDT by Wiseghy ("Sometimes you're windshield, sometimes you' re the bug")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blam
Earliest European 31,000 Years Old

Ask him if he knows Helen Thomas.


6 posted on 05/19/2005 2:54:54 PM PDT by Nick Danger (Look! Someone has severed a circuit in the Admin Moderator)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blam
Just a jolly little reminder that the average brain size of a Neanderthal was larger than that of modern man. Whatever happened to them, we didn't outsmart them.
7 posted on 05/19/2005 2:55:31 PM PDT by Citizen Tom Paine (A old sailor sends.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Nick Danger

Or Robert Byrd.


8 posted on 05/19/2005 2:55:42 PM PDT by hispanarepublicana (I was Lucy Ramirez when being Lucy Ramirez was't cool.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Citizen Tom Paine
Yeah but if brain size correlated with intelligence we'd all be kneeling to our glorious, benevolent and most importantly, super psychic, elephant overlords.
9 posted on 05/19/2005 3:02:04 PM PDT by Anvilhead
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Anvilhead

I'd be willing to bet that blue whales have even bigger brains than elephants.


10 posted on 05/19/2005 3:03:27 PM PDT by eastsider
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: blam
"But another theory suggests the two hominid species lived side by side for many thousands of years and may have intermingled, which implies there could be Neanderthal genes in the human gene pool today."

I've always wondered about the family who lives about a mile down the road from me.

11 posted on 05/19/2005 3:04:26 PM PDT by davisfh
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blam
I would think that Neanderthals were pretty much gone at 31,00 YA.
12 posted on 05/19/2005 3:05:21 PM PDT by Mike Darancette (Mesocons for Rice '08)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Anvilhead

...LOL...


...shhh...

you know if you get out of line they will trample you...


13 posted on 05/19/2005 3:09:02 PM PDT by MD_Willington_1976
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Citizen Tom Paine

"Just a jolly little reminder that the average brain size of a Neanderthal was larger than that of modern man."

So what? I am always told that size does not matter.


14 posted on 05/19/2005 3:09:07 PM PDT by AlexW (Reporting from Bratislava)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Mike Darancette
"I would think that Neanderthals were pretty much gone at 31,000 YA.

Actually, they found one in Spain even younger than that...24,000, I think.

15 posted on 05/19/2005 3:19:13 PM PDT by blam
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: eastsider
Yes, true, but let's face it, no super psychic whale is going to take over the world. They would sing a great song of peace called "Lesbian Seagulls" and we would all come together in peace and harmony untill the Vogons come down to make way for the interstellar off ramp.

Elephants are the only ones strong enough in the dark side to fight off the alien's powers. Why do you think republicans use it as an avatar?

We know whats up.
16 posted on 05/19/2005 3:22:34 PM PDT by Anvilhead
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: blam
Wild's team suggests the teeth are about 31,000 radiocarbon years old, a yardstick that can be somewhat different from calendar years.

Radiocarbon years and calendar years tend to diverge and converge at different periods in prehistory, consistent with varying amounts of carbon 14 in the atmosphere.

The discrepancy is significant during this period in prehistory, and calibrating radiocarbon and calendar years is a matter of ongoing research.

That was interesting and I learned something new, to boot.

17 posted on 05/19/2005 3:30:12 PM PDT by DumpsterDiver
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: davisfh
"But another theory suggests the two hominid species lived side by side for many thousands of years and may have intermingled, which implies there could be Neanderthal genes in the human gene pool today."

Implies?? Nah, it's a known fact. Today, we call them LIBERALS.

18 posted on 05/19/2005 3:34:57 PM PDT by NW Mike (Proud member of the VRWC since 1972 -- who the hell are you calling 'neo'?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Anvilhead
You might be on to something. The more I think about it, I've never even heard of a red whale.
19 posted on 05/19/2005 3:45:11 PM PDT by eastsider
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: NW Mike
"Today, we call them LIBERALS."

Dang! Why didn't I think of that? Sloping forehead, vacant stare, hand out, salivating heavily when a free meal is presented. How could I have missed that?

20 posted on 05/19/2005 4:10:38 PM PDT by davisfh
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-44 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson