Posted on 02/13/2015 5:10:35 PM PST by 2ndDivisionVet
Don’t like him, don’t like his people.
If its not Cruz, Im sitting at home. The Repukes are on their last legs with me
this is BS. Either you are for amnesty or you are not. I don’t trust Scott Walker farther than I can throw him.
Oh, I could pull a lever for Sarah Palin or Bobby Jindal, but they ain’t gonna be the nominee, are they?
You ought to do a write in at least. Sitting at home just encourages that bunch to think creatively and they aren’t the type for any good to come of that ;)
Walker is against amnesty.
“If its not Cruz, Im sitting at home. The Repukes are on their last legs with me”
____________
Are you attending precinct meetings to talk Cruz up? Are you active in the local party on behalf of Cruz? Or are you “sitting at home” right now, complaining that no one else is doing what has to be done?
Well, that stinks, but it’s not surprising.
Government wants to sell us out, and it’s going to.
pandering to illegal immigrants...a deal breaker for this voter.
Yeah, that’s why the article says he’s for it, because they’re all liars.
I get a kick out of the pouters who say, “If it isn’t MY guy then I’m staying home.” I guess, in their minds, it’s better to let a liberal socialist win rather than a candidate who has conservative ideas although maybe a few don’t match the personal “ideal” candidate. Is there any conservative candidate who will please every conservative voter? I doubt it. Let the Democrats win, I guess. I’m taking my ball and going home ... so there, I guess I showed you!
Oh.
Allahpundit.
Yeah right.
Did you trust Reagan ?
I only bring this up since I don’t think ANY Conservative candidate can ever be perfect.
Reagan and Abortion: Some Perspective
http://www.nationalreview.com/corner/258564/reagan-and-abortion-some-perspective-steven-f-hayward
Snip
It is true that as California governor, Reagan signed one of the early permissive state-level abortion laws. He hesitated a long time over this decision, and quickly came to regret it. He explained in a letter to Henry Hyde in 1976:
The only circumstance under which I felt [abortion] could be justified was self-defense, a concept deeply rooted in our laws and traditions. If a mother’s life is endangered by her own unborn child, she has a right to protect her life. I do not believe, however, that abortion of a less-than-perfect child, or abortion for convenience sake or abortion because “a mistake” has been made can be justified.
The bill I signed followed the self-defense concept. As time was to prove, however, it contained one flaw. The self-defense concept also included a provision in cases where a mother’s mental health might be irreparably damaged. This required professional certification, but as we were to learn, it became subject to very liberal interpretation by some psychiatrists to justify abortions that should not have been made.
snip
There’s much more to this issue and it has certainly had profound implications as California has led the nation in many other legal decisions.
Reagan signed it as Governor and “Quickly” regretted it.
Don’t get me wrong, I love Reagan, I’m just saying that there may be some things that are a “non-starter” that must be considered in there proper context.
Allahpundit didn’t break the story, National Review did.
EEE hardest hit??
Damn straight bro, I understand where you're coming from and I love your principles.
With that being said, if it's Cruz, I'M sitting home..........
One step further, if it's not MY GUY, I'm gonna stay home and pout right along with you bro.........We'll show 'em!
Enjoy voting for Jeb. :)
No lie. Good try. Clear as a mouthful of crap.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.