Posted on 02/13/2015 5:10:35 PM PST by 2ndDivisionVet
The RINOs on this forum will do anything to tell us Cruz cannot win or that he’s ineligible. Often these trolls are paid by Rove
We got one just like Walker down here in Florida. Maybe you know him. His name is Marco Rubio. He says he’s against amnesty too. Even though everything he’s done in the past says he’s for amnesty. Who should I be willing to believe him or my lying eyes?
When Cruz gets right on H-1b I am all in. Not holding my breath though.
Being on the amnesty band wagon isn’t a “little flaw”. Is getting your leg blown off a flesh wound?
What would be candidate has zero problems?
What is his definition of amnesty? Walker has said he is for a pathway to citizenship. Having illegals go to the back of the line, pay fines etc. he doesn’t consider amnesty.
One of his spokesmen came out after the Raddatz interview and clarified what he meant by amnesty.
It’s like Bill Clinton when he said he didn’t have sex with that woman it all depended on what your definition of sex was. He didn’t believe oral sex was really sex.
Walker will say he is not for amnesty but he is being coy. His definition of amnesty is certainly a lot different than mine.
A Republican candidate that doesn't get right with a complete halt to illegal and unconstrained legal immigration IS NOT GOING TO WIN.
If I though a Democrat Candidate could be trusted and they ran on that one issue I would vote for them. So that isn't going to happen. So I probably won't vote this time.
Cruz’s position is the same as Obama’s - born outside the USA, and one parent not a U.S. citizen (his dad was not naturalized until 2005, and was a Cuban citizen at the time of Cruz’s birth). If Obama is not a natural-born citizen, then neither is Cruz.
I like Ted Cruz. I’d vote for him in a heartbeat. But I am not willing to play the “my guy gets the exception” game and spend eight years pointing out that Obama’s not eligible, only to turn around and start ignoring the Constitution just because it’s “our” guy now. That’s hypocritical.
If you people want to throw a hissy fit and zot me, go right ahead. But if we’ve reached the day where FR zots people for being concerned about the Constitution as it relates to the current flavor of the week candidate, then Free Republic will have outlived its usefulness to the long-term prospects of liberty in America.
“The invasion must be stopped or we lose the country. No other issue matters if we lose on amnesty. Lose the rule of law and what do you have? North Mexico”
Exactly.
Notice how this piece came out AFTER Walker’s speech in Iowa - just sayin...
>>Reagan signed it as Governor and “Quickly” regretted it.
Governors are always doing stuff like that. Let’s pick someone for freedom.
“Good bye to you my trusted friend”
“Good bye my friend it’s hard to die”
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.