Posted on 11/22/2002 1:38:24 AM PST by ppaul
"What would Jesus drive?" asks the new religious campaign against SUVs. Naturally, everyone has been eager to supply a punch line.My initial thought was a donkey, which has considerably less passenger and cargo space than an SUV, along with emissions problems of its own. Then a colleague pointed out that Jesus was a carpenter, so he'd probably want a pickup truck, which falls into the same mileage and emissions category as an SUV, to haul his lumber.
On CNN's "Talk Back Live," a guest suggested that Jesus might very well drive a big SUV, especially if he was traveling with the apostles. People interviewed on the street pictured Jesus in "a really, really, really long limo" (because "he'd have to travel in style"), a blue Miata ("economical and sporty"), and a Honda Civic (no particular reason offered).
One audience member said Jesus obviously would ride the bus, to be with "the masses." Another said he surely would walk, so the whole argument was stupid.
Taking the question literally is not just a way to poke fun at environmentalist puritans who cloak their ideological agenda in Scripture. It also reveals the fatuousness of the assertion that if you want to be a good Christian you should "drive the most fuel-efficient vehicle that truly meets your needs."
That's how the Rev. Jim Ball of the Evangelical Environmental Network summed up the message of his group's anti-SUV ads, which argue that God frowns on the Ford Explorer. But people generally do not buy a vehicle, which involves laying out or borrowing many thousands of dollars, for reasons they consider frivolous. They buy it because, in their judgment, it meets their needs. Truly.
People like SUVs because they're roomier, more comfortable and safer than lighter, smaller cars. Although most SUV owners don't take them off road, they still value four-wheel drive in rainy or icy conditions. And yes, they like the way the cars look -- i.e., a little more exciting than their fathers' station wagons. Is that a sin?
Apparently, it is. While Ball might allow that a big family or someone who often carries cargo truly needs an SUV or a minivan (which has a similar environmental profile), I suspect he would have nothing but contempt for the guy who commutes in a Jeep Cherokee because it looks cool.
Since I am not any sort of Christian, I suppose I have no hope of being a good one, but consider my situation as a thought experiment. I drive a 2000 Honda CR-V, which has a mileage rating of 22 mpg in the city, 25 on the highway. My wife drives a 2001 Toyota Echo, which has a 32/38 rating. Between the two of us, could we be at least a mediocre Christian?
Presumably Ball and his fellow anti-SUV crusaders hope to promote such debates in households across America. And if they manage to do that, they will accomplish -- well, pretty much nothing, if their goal is to reduce pollution.
It's true that SUVs tend to get lower mileage and generate more emissions than other cars. But all cars and light trucks (including SUVs, pickups and minivans) together account for only 1.5 percent of the world's man-made greenhouse gas emissions.
Looking just at motor vehicles, research by University of Denver chemist Donald Stedman has shown that 5 percent to 10 percent of cars are responsible for about half of tailpipe emissions. These "gross polluters" tend to be older, poorly maintained cars. If Ball and his allies really want to make a dent in car pollution, they should collect contributions to help people who can't afford it fix or replace these clunkers.
Instead, the anti-SUV crowd has focused on increasing fuel efficiency, both by encouraging drivers to choose cars with Jesus in mind and by pushing the federal government to raise mileage standards for light trucks -- a move the Bush administration is considering. One problem with this approach is that higher fuel efficiency makes cars cheaper to operate, which encourages people to drive more.
Another problem is that making cars more fuel-efficient often means making them lighter, and therefore less safe in crashes. A 1989 study by researchers at Harvard and the Brookings Institution concluded that fuel economy standards kill thousands of Americans each year.
Getting people out of SUVs and into lighter vehicles means some of them will die in crashes they otherwise might have survived. What would Jesus say about that?
Contact Jacob Sullum | Read his biography
judas be driving a yugo with the repo man looking for him
But come quickly, Lord Jesus, 'cause these liberals are really starting to get on my nerves. Amen.
Maybe he would take a boat. He'd probably fly.
Moe-hammed Ha Gamal, on the other hand, commandeered Caravans on a regular basis.
During his lifetime, a beat-up old CJ-5.
Unpretentious, durable, go-anywhere.
After His resurrection, a Hummer. (which, after all, is a Jeep that’s died and gone to Heaven)
How tall is He??
Most tall guys would like more leg and head room when they comment on my car.
If God's not too tall, he'd like it but he'd probably aske me when was the last time I cleaned it. He'd be happy that it was pretty good in our winter weather. He'd like the heater. But would he listen to Rush?? or is He into the classical stuff. Do I tell Him, my car, my pick??
So many questions for God but I'm sure he'd at least think "it beats a burro".!!
Three Proofs That Jesus Was...
THREE PROOFS THAT JESUS WAS BLACK:
1. He called everybody brother
2. He had no permanent address
3. Nobody would hire him
THREE PROOFS THAT JESUS WAS JEWISH:
1. He lived at home until the age of 33
2. He went into his father's business
3. He was sure his mother was a virgin, and his mother was sure he was God
THREE PROOFS THAT JESUS WAS IRISH:
1. He never got married.
2. He never held a steady job
3. His last request was a drink
THREE PROOFS THAT JESUS WAS ITALIAN:
1. He talked with his hands
2. He had wine with every meal
3. He worked in the building trades
THREE PROOFS THAT JESUS WAS CALIFORNIAN:
1. He never cut his hair
2. He walked around barefoot
3. He invented a new religion
THREE PROOFS THAT JESUS WAS PUERTO RICAN:
1. His first name was Jesus
2. He was always in trouble with the law
3. His mother did not know who his father was
THREE PROOFS THAT JESUS WAS A CULTIST:
1. He formed his own secret group of 12 followers.
2. He claimed he had special connection to God.
3. On the third day after his death he went up to the spaceship.
THREE PROOFS THAT JESUS WAS IN ADVERTISING
1. He found himself regularly praying for mercy.
2. He liked to make big speeches at supper.
3. He was adamant that even the most whopping sins can be forgiven.
THREE PROOFS THAT JESUS WAS A RASTAFARIAN
1. He was from Babylon.
2. He wore dread locks.
3. His picture is on the zig-zag package.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.