Posted on 06/16/2023 12:05:58 PM PDT by nickcarraway
This is complete BS. Because nobody expected this boycott. Everyone’s reaction was that “this won’t work” in the beginning. It’s only in hindsight that people claim they “knew this would happen”.
This is reverse psy-ops to get the boycott to stop, and Tomi Lahren is a fake conservative who supports gay-marriage and abortion.
But the only audience they would have gotten from Dylan Mulvaney was children. And children can’t drink in most states.
I agree, dumb plan. But I think it’s just speculation.
Coke never screwed up like this.
Did the Dodgers cancel their insulting "Nuns of Perpetual Indulgence" show/event? This is all a result of the Marketing/Sales indoctrination of the idiot Gen-Z students and others who think it's a cool trend including parents. I'm happy to start seeing some backlash.
But then, you have the Space Force general claiming she can't get recruits because of State laws protecting our children, as if they could enlist at their age.
My personal phrase that would get me arrested in the UK:
You LGBTQXYZ freaks can go to hell. Go back into the closet you damn perves and stop grooming our innocent children. Let them be children you sick fucks!
I read somewhere that transvestites, trans-sexuals, etc. amount to around 1.2 million people in the US. Why would Budweiser want to orient its market to a group that makes up a fraction of a percent of the population?
Mulvaney has 11 million followers, and most of them are minors. So, they weren’t going after trans, they were going after under 21s.
I smell bullcrap.
There is no more of a sure bet these days then go woke go broke.
Do you think anybody would purposely manipulate shares of stock in the stock market on a sure bet?
If the stock lost 5 billion in value that money came from somewhere. Somebody else made $5 billion, if they sold short in the market.
Are trannies big beer drinkers?
Well, they succeeded.
Maybe they should rename it Bud Light In The Loafers.
Horsecrap.
I dunno Jack, you make a solid argument, but ... InBev intentionally gave the account to a 39-year-old woke woman, who then bragged about what she was about to do to the brand.
"Heinerscheid gave an interview in which she described her efforts to move Bud Light away from a “fratty” and “out-of-touch” image and attract new customers with a more “inclusive” approach.Bud Light later blamed the partnership on a “third-party ad agency,” though Heinerscheid’s boss Daniel Blake was also placed on leave in the midst of the debacle."
I do believe Plan A -- let's piss off Joe 32-pack Butt Light drinkers -- 'got away from them', but who says destroying the brand wasn't Plan B.
“I have a hard time believing this. “
I don’t believe it either because the wiser choice would be to introduce a new beer brand for the exotic ones.
Yeah...anyone can commit suicide...but if you try and “fail” you’re a dumba$$ forever.
not buyin’ it
the revisionist crap
and the beer
When all else fails, BUD is now playing the victim card.
Goodness I feel so sorry for them. HAHAHAHA!!!!
This is 100% spin. They messed up. They know they messed up.
Grooming kids, and encouraging them to drink beer? How on earth can they justify this?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.