Show me the error.
I’ll say. Whatever might have been said about women’s suffrage, was said over 100 years ago. Did he really have to reopen the issue. Moronic.
Women vote on emotions and feelings. Not substance. See Soccer moms.
“A Michigan candidate for the US House backed by former President Donald Trump once railed against giving women the right to vote”
LOL. So much for this idiot. Next.
So? And? What's the problem here?
The Michigan 3rd is a strong Republican District that President Trump won by three points. My guess is that this story gets no traction and is forgotten about in a couple days.
No better a look than to claim the same re: the right for blacks to vote.
John Gibbs is right about the 19th amendment but if he wants to get elected he has to lie about his thoughts on the issue. Half of his constituents are women and he cannot afford to alienate them.
I’ll less concerned about women voting than about non-property owners voting. If a woman owns property, fine, let her vote.
Correlation is not causation.
53% for the wrong side (these days) is not overwhelming evidence of predictable behavior.
I’d happily give up the right to vote in order to put an end to the political power of lesbian feminists!
(See tagline)
I’m a woman, and I agree with him 100%
Was he a teenager when he wrote this?
Where is the GOP campaign research on the teenage rantings of his Democrat opponent?
No where, of course.
Pathetic - and, I cannot wait to see the new and improved voter fraud protection the GOP has developed when our guy loses by 500 votes.
Here’s a clip from the Man Show when Jimmy Kimmel was funny. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Rhn-AkKi8Qc Stop the Suffrage.
The guy’s opinion is about as popular as having Hitler host a bar mitzvah.
Within a few years of women’s suffrage we saw the rise of the welfare state under Roosevelt, with government becoming a nanny and taxing people to “redistribute” wealth in all manner of unconstitutional ways. I don’t think that’s an accident. Women tend to look for an authority who is also a provider for their lives; in a husband that works fine, but government can only provide by taking from others, making such a thing inherently unjust. While plenty of women reject such a path, I suspect this tendency is strong enough that it proved fatal to the health of the constitutional republic.
Look at the miscreant 'females' in our House and Senate! Infidels, all. Heck, just look at Hillary! (No, don't. Sorry, LOL!)
If we were going to get the vote, we needed skin in the game as in being a TAXPAYER and/or Land Owner.
If you're neither of these, and you are voting for 'perks' from Mother Government, you shouldn't be voting.
I would change the last line of the above to, 'and then all Hell breaks loose!'
Full disclosure: Taxpayer since I was 15 years old. Owned my first property at age 25. Veteran. Past Business Owner. Future SS recipient; I earned it! It was MY MONEY taken from me in the first place. Plenty of skin in the game.
Female Sufferidge did bring about the horrible policies of Prohibition.
America has “suffered” since women’s suffrage.>>>
Its a good arguent.
It has converted elections into popularity “nice hair” contests rather than policy based voting.
Its worse today because a whole generation has not been required to study the Constitution, civics or history in school.