Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Michigan Bowhunter

I’ll less concerned about women voting than about non-property owners voting. If a woman owns property, fine, let her vote.


15 posted on 09/22/2022 3:04:44 PM PDT by viewfromthefrontier
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: viewfromthefrontier

But please bear in mind, that “property requirement” is a myth. First of all, like female suffrage, the states used to be able to decide who voted. 2nd, oftentimes, “property” did not mean any more than having a dollar in your pocket.


24 posted on 09/22/2022 3:10:53 PM PDT by the OlLine Rebel (Common sense is an uncommon virtue./Federal-run medical care is as good as state-run DMV.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies ]

To: viewfromthefrontier

“I’ll less concerned about women voting than about non-property owners voting. If a woman owns property, fine, let her vote.”

Does the property owner ‘own the property’ if they’re still carrying a mortgage payment?

I would say they don’t until they pay off their bank note.


37 posted on 09/22/2022 3:45:40 PM PDT by unclebankster (Globalism is the last refuge of a scoundrel.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies ]

To: viewfromthefrontier

Yes there needs to be a minimum property ownership to vote. Include in that other assets besides housing though.


42 posted on 09/22/2022 3:55:52 PM PDT by Sam Gamgee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson