Posted on 05/25/2022 9:31:37 AM PDT by Kaslin
What a joke! They AREN’T out of touch. They are consolidating power. The World Economic Forum is becoming untouchable.
Globohomo wants more globohomo. It’s all fun and games until you run up against a real world obstacle like Putin.
Another poll that lines up with those polls:
“Economy bigger priority than punishing Russia: AP poll” (AP: 5/24/22)
https://freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/4065847/posts
More than once, as with Libya, NATO wasn’t defending against a nation being an aggressor towards them, given that NATO offensively bombed Libya on Odumba’s behalf on unproven allegations that Gaddafi was going to kill 10k of his own people.
The current and past three prime ministers of Finland are WEF Young Global Leaders
The current prime minister of Sweden - In April 2021, Andersson stated on Facebook that she would support a global economic restart to save the planet, a plan heavily promoted by the World Economic Forum. The statement was posted the same day that Andersson attended the International Monetary Fund’s 43rd international meeting. Andersson also stated that the restart of the global economy is conditional on all countries in the world getting vaccinated. She also announced that she would take over as chairman of the IMF Council (IMFC).[2][3]
They’ll fit right in with the NATO globalists
https://www.nato.int/nato2030/young-leaders/
NATO even has it’s own Young Leaders and plans for 2030
UN/WHO/WEF/NATO = NWO
“...thereby provoking Russia even further.”
I personally don’t give a crap about Russia being ‘provoked’ because other countries want to defend themselves against a potential Russian invasion.
**** Russia, **** Putin, and **** their feelings.
NATO expansion is the absolute worst thing for US interests in the world.
So many things more important...border...trade...Pacific Rim...abrogation of the NATO treaty...and that’s just international affairs.
Then we have crushing domestic issues. And that’s a long list.
Libya wasn’t and isn’t a country in NATO.
The NATO treaty is being talked about now because of Finland and Sweden seeking membership. Those countries are primary targets for the Russian aggression, just like Ukraine was and is. Should we (NATO) deny them membership, just because of what happened in the past with Libya or any other conflicts?
Expanding NATO is supposed to be about fending off any potential aggression, such as from Russia, and it’s not about seeking more conflicts, like the article above claims.
NO MORE NATO!!!! Remember the martyrs of 1999!!!!
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/NATO_bombing_of_Yugoslavia
Memory Eternal!!!!
And NO MORE DAVOS!!!! PHOOEY to all globalist elitists!!!!
They will not stop until the rainbow flag flies over the smoking ruins of the Kremlin.
You missed the point for whatever reason:
Here’s what you said:
“And here I thought that joining a military defense pact with other countries, was to eliminate the possibility of a military conflict.”
NATO causes conflicts and bombs other countries, offensively, as with Libya, against its own charter, against other countries not attacking or threatening NATO members, and many times at that, thus is a rogue organization.
Trump would have killed this dead in the water and why they removed him. His foreign policy was just not to their liking and he refused to line up for them.
Why russia, russia, russia since 2015.
BTW, Rick Wilson is a scumbag full of rotted waste. Fiona Hill, too.
The New World Order needs a military.
NATO will fill that role.
It was mostly his attempt to stop the Bush Plan for North Mexico (aka USA) but his foreign policy was also an impetus for the Bush League Republicans to throw in with the Democrats to cheat Trump out.
Both issues are about the New World Order.
They have to steal our country from us first.
NATO’s reason for being evaporated in the early 1990’s.
It should have been disbanded.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.