Libya wasn’t and isn’t a country in NATO.
The NATO treaty is being talked about now because of Finland and Sweden seeking membership. Those countries are primary targets for the Russian aggression, just like Ukraine was and is. Should we (NATO) deny them membership, just because of what happened in the past with Libya or any other conflicts?
Expanding NATO is supposed to be about fending off any potential aggression, such as from Russia, and it’s not about seeking more conflicts, like the article above claims.
You missed the point for whatever reason:
Here’s what you said:
“And here I thought that joining a military defense pact with other countries, was to eliminate the possibility of a military conflict.”
NATO causes conflicts and bombs other countries, offensively, as with Libya, against its own charter, against other countries not attacking or threatening NATO members, and many times at that, thus is a rogue organization.