Posted on 05/02/2020 8:16:37 AM PDT by knighthawk
The New York Times on Saturday called for the Democratic National Committee to investigate the sexual assault claims against presumptive Democratic nominee Joe Biden -- a day after he denied the allegations for the first time.
As is so often the case in such situations, it is all but impossible to be certain of the truth. But the stakes are too high to let the matter fester or leave it to be investigated by and adjudicated in the media. Mr. Biden is seeking the nations highest office, a column by the Times Editorial Board said.
The call came a day after Biden answered allegations by former staffer Tara Reade that he assaulted her in 1993. The response came in an interview on MSNBCs Morning Joe and in a written statement.
(Excerpt) Read more at foxnews.com ...
DNC covered up the Seth Rich murder, which they likely sanctioned in the first place.
Biden is a placeholder, simply taking the slings and arrows until the “October Surprise”.
re: longknives are out for Biden
LA Times: Tara Reade’s Allegations against Biden DEMANDS to be investigated (today’s editorial - 5-2-2020)
NY Times: Similar call for investigation
AND
Illinois Sen.Tami Duckworth on Thurs(?) called for investigation
Can Biden read the writing on the wall (or should I say Can Jill read?)
>>As is so often the case in such situations, it is all but impossible to be certain of the truth. But the stakes are too high to let the matter fester or leave it to be investigated by and adjudicated in the media. Mr. Biden is seeking the nations highest office, <<
In the case of Kavanaugh there was not a single credible witness, even of her complaining to others, and blasey ford’s statements were 100% contradictory and/or garbled into nonsense.
Reade’s accusations are internally consistent and there are 3 named (and many others) witnesses and a recording of a broadcast with the report of what happened.
In the first case 100% possible to ascertain it never happened. In the latter it is 100% possible to ascertain it did.
Despite their journalistic incompetence, the NYT is aware of enough source material to destroy Biden as a candidate.
The water is rapidly receding from the shoreline. The NYT is desperately seeking high ground while the rest of the Progtard DildoCrats rush down to see the tide go out.
The tsunami is coming and they are powerless to stop it.
OK, he’s gone.
Who’s next up? Bernie? He never gave up his delegates, so...?
The Left likes to refer to President Trump having sexual allegations, but I never, never remember, and I could be wrong, a time when a female accused him of UNWANTED attention.
THAT is an important difference. Equal consent is very different than touching, smelling, kissing cheeks and tops of heads, and hugging when the child, girl or woman does NOT want it.
This will be the shortest investigation in history.
You now the only reason the Slimes is making this call is because not even they can ignore Joe’s dementia any longer.
clear evidence that hillary and the dnc are making her move NOW... just to prevent her team’s en toto indictment onslaught.
You make a good point. However, I think the people see that Trump showed them prosperity with no help from the other side for 3 years. Then COVID hit. Do people really think Imbecile Joe is going to lead us out of this from his basement? I think most people who hate Trump would just choose not to vote rather than cut their nose off. On the other hand, Bernie may be able to convince people that this is a new world order and as such we need to think that way politically - blow up the status quo in favor of a Socialist society. Either way, I think Biden is a weaker candidate by a lot. PLUS.....I don't think he is going to get much support from the far left (which he needs) because they are seething mad that the last two nominations were basically stolen from them.
In any case, just giving him grief is worth it.
“or leave it to be investigated by and adjudicated in the media.”
Why not, they did it to Trump.
It could be that Biden sidelines the "purists" to throw away their vote on the Green Party, so that is a possibility.
I’m still wondering how many times the Bidens appear on Epstein’s “guest list”. He’s more interested in little kids than anyone of the opposite sex who is even remotely close to his own age.
Sure, the DNC will do it fairly and without bias.
I am with you Mort. They demanded that the K nomination process be stopped until the FBI did a complete and thorough investigation. NYT knows the DNC will be quick and the result will be to clear Biden at this late election cycle hour.
NYT also knows an outside party or law enforcement agency investigation will be in the headlines into the summer if not the fall (no WJClinton tarmac meeting this time to get the AG to shut it down); and there will be a finding that Biden ‘s did what he is accused of doing.
The great irony is that Biden voted against Clarence Thomas’ SC nomination b/c “I believed her from the very beginning, but I was chairman. She did not get a fair hearing. She did not get treated well. That’s my [responsibility](**1) It apparently wasn’t fair b/c Thomas was voted onto the Court.
More importantly, is Tara Reade going to get a fair hearing, Joe? NYT? demonkraps?
Translation: NY Times calls for white wash and victim payoff.
I've shifted my thinking lately to the idea that Pence will get Trump's 3rd term a la Poppy and then identically lose his re-election bid.
The Democrats have made a gross miscalculation on this #Plandemic -- when you see California in revolt, WOW, it warms my heart. God Bless you Jim Rob and all you Californians for sticking it to Gov. Gruesome.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.