Posted on 05/02/2020 8:16:37 AM PDT by knighthawk
The New York Times on Saturday called for the Democratic National Committee to investigate the sexual assault claims against presumptive Democratic nominee Joe Biden -- a day after he denied the allegations for the first time.
As is so often the case in such situations, it is all but impossible to be certain of the truth. But the stakes are too high to let the matter fester or leave it to be investigated by and adjudicated in the media. Mr. Biden is seeking the nations highest office, a column by the Times Editorial Board said.
The call came a day after Biden answered allegations by former staffer Tara Reade that he assaulted her in 1993. The response came in an interview on MSNBCs Morning Joe and in a written statement.
(Excerpt) Read more at foxnews.com ...
Not that all the groping we see by him on women and young girls is not a strong indication of his perverted sex mind and the probability he would go farther if he got one in a private situation. Move over and make room for Cuomo and Hillary.
“This is the start of the Draft Cuomo movements final push. When the MSM cant stop the social media firestorm they toss in the gasoline and call for bogus investigations. Look for Fingers removal of his name from consideration next month, leaving plenty of time to make Cuomo the New Normal Candidate!”
Yup....or Bozo’s Patrick Ewing look-a-like wife.
I bet the NYT’slike magichas someone in mind to jump in for Crazy Joe when this is proven true. Lots of odd vocal support from several types like Hillary and Pelosi last week. I read all the “we love and support Joe” comments as paving the way for this investigation so they would look good when suddenly Hillary is ask to step in for Crazy Joe when the charges are proven to be true.
I read a comment that DNC types had gone through papers belonging to Crazy Joe to clean them, but what if they actually stained them for Hillary? Don’t put anything past Hillary/Pelosi and company.
I'd love to see Sleepy Joe look into Durham's steely eyes and say "C'mon man, let's go outside and settle this...'
Right. Otherwise this was from a spoof satire site.
Who are they in that “NYT” place, anyway. Dimly remember them from long ago but I have totally boycotted the NYT for a long time.
Bill O’Reilly thinks the NYT blundered a few days ago and now has to explain why an earlier item mentioned her story in a neutral manner. This would mean they now have to report on it in depth or look even stupider. He may be right.
Hmmm... Okay, I think we can sugget the composition of such a panel.
- - Matt Lauer,
- - Bill Cosby *,
- - Harvey Weinstein *,
- - Al Franken, and
- - Jeffrey Epstein **.
The Panel should have a chairperson who has experience and knowledge of the subject, meaning of course...
- - Bill Clinton
.
.
* (Will join panel discussions from, cough cough, "home")
** (Is unable to join panel discussions, but can, of course, still vote).
.
DNC “investigations” of Rats are concluded in a few business hours.
BJ’s wife supports him now, who will dare to criticize her “choice”?
Please don’t. All we will get is dead bodies and bicycle racks.
Oh, come on now! Ewing's moustache was never that thick...
In the midst of the coronavirus pandemonium we have largely neglected the scandal that may be even more damaging to Biden than this one with the mushy middle.....
Trump has not pushed what Biden et al did in China, Ukraine, Romania, Iraq, and elsewhere. All Trump has to say is “can you imagine if Don Jr. signed a contract like these?” The left would go ballistic and rightfully so. Biden, being Biden, did not even attempt to hide what he did knowing the MSM would give the Obama administration a pass. He even bragged about it on video!
What did the Biden staff remove from his archives?
Their internal polling may have them worried. The decreased mental state has them worried. However, they cooked the process for Biden to insure Bernie did not win again so short of Biden dropping out of his own accord, how do you fix it and who can you fix it with? C’mon man!
I think the strategy is to do a fair investigation, find insufficient evidence to convict, then pronounce him totally clean. Due process works when it’s tried. Too bad they don’t grant due process to republicans and conservatives.
Paging Donna Brazille, paging Donna Brazille...please pickup the white paging phone...
I *did* say “marginally”. LOL
When Kavanaugh was accused over a 37 year old allegation (with no supporting evidence), the dems demanded the FBI investigate. With Gropin Joe, they’re not willing to chance that an agent of conscience might accidentally be assigned to the case.
In a weird way, at this point we really need Biden to stay in the race. He has been damaged and he is such and imbecile to begin with. He is our easiest path to re-election. I know of no one who can say with a straight face that he is the one to lead the recovery. He is a joke, and an embarrassment to the Democrat party. They are so committed at this point they are actually going to try to trick the people into thinking he is viable. Should be fun to watch.
Wait a minute. Didn’t the slmes just do an investigation and conclude there was nothing there?
Tipping point....Plugs wont last.
Punting the football point. Plugs is going to be the nom. Guaranteed.
Thats like asking Hillary to investigate Bill.
Unfortunately, nearly all people voting for Biden just don’t care about this. Especially when he is on the ballot against Trump.
Yep. As Walter Clondike would say: "When you've lost the New York Times, you've lost the war."
As Lyndon Baines Biden WILL say: "I come to you with a heavy heart, and will neither seek nor accept the nomination to the Presidency of the United States. I will return home to Beijing to spend more time with my family."
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.