Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Boulder City Council considering Ordinance 8245: adding additional firearm regulations
Official Boulder City Council Meeting Notification | 3/31/2018 | self

Posted on 03/31/2018 4:35:56 PM PDT by flamberge

Boulder City Council is considering:

Ordinance 8245: adding additional firearm regulations to the Boulder Revised Code

MEETING DATE:
April 5, 2018

AGENDA TITLE

Introduction, first reading and consideration of a motion to order published by title only:
Ordinance 8245 adding additional firearm regulations to the Boulder Revised Code

PRIMARY STAFF CONTACT
Thomas Carr, City Attorney, 303-441-3020

REQUESTED ACTION OR MOTION LANGUAGE
Motion to introduce and order published by title only
Ordinance 8245 imposing additional firearm restrictions in the city of Boulder and setting forth related details

ATTACHMENTS:
Description
Memo and Attachments


TOPICS: Activism/Chapters; News/Current Events; US: Colorado
KEYWORDS: 2ndamendment; armedcitizen; banglist; boulder; ccw; colorado; concealedcarry; denver; guncontrol; rkba; secondamendment; selfdefense
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-35 next last
---Editorial Comment by Poster---

Quick Summary:

This ordinance bans possession or sale or transfer of a wide variety of semi-automatic rifles (Specifically including the Colt AR-14) and imposes registration requirements on city residents who may wish to retain any of the prohibited items for a limited time period. Due to magazine capacity limitations, the ordinance effectively bans a number of semi-automatic pistols, including most Glock models, and some Sig-Sauer models.

Additionally, the ordinance forbids transport of loaded firearms within the city- which renders a CCW permit largely useless.

The full text of the proposed ordinance is available on the City of Boulder Website.

The City Council appears to be favorably disposed to passing this ordinance.

1 posted on 03/31/2018 4:35:56 PM PDT by flamberge
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: flamberge

Didn’t San Francisco get smacked down for doing the same thing?


2 posted on 03/31/2018 4:36:58 PM PDT by shelterguy (Bigdeal)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: flamberge

I assume this news is from Boulder, Colo., the Berkeley of the Midwest. If so, it’s hardly a surprise.


3 posted on 03/31/2018 4:40:00 PM PDT by Fiji Hill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: flamberge

More laws. That’ll stop em.


4 posted on 03/31/2018 4:43:15 PM PDT by lurk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: flamberge

I got my NRA notice today and told my wife I’m going to attend the meeting but didn’t think I would get a seat due to the number of 2A supporters that would be there. Remember ‘Jill Adler Grano’. If anyone can discover who is supporting her, please let everyone know.


5 posted on 03/31/2018 4:45:16 PM PDT by dljordan (WhoVoltaire: "To find out who rules over you, simply find out who you are not allowed to criticize.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: flamberge
forbids transport of loaded firearms within the city. So, I cannot drive through with them? Will UPS and FedEx be arrested for carrying a package through the city to deliver on the other side?
6 posted on 03/31/2018 4:46:13 PM PDT by Reno89519 (If Trump can't deliver and folds like a typical Republican, maybe he should be impeached.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: flamberge

Colorado doesn’t have state pre-emption???


7 posted on 03/31/2018 4:46:16 PM PDT by Wonder Warthog (The Hog of Steel and NRA Life Member)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Reno89519

Okay, sorry... they spoke of loaded, but the possession and all that they want to ban is problematic. (and hopefully FedEx and UPS are not delivering loaded guns to anyone!).


8 posted on 03/31/2018 4:47:31 PM PDT by Reno89519 (If Trump can't deliver and folds like a typical Republican, maybe he should be impeached.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: flamberge; george76

The Denver-Boulder axis of evil strikes again. If you carry, stay away from both.


9 posted on 03/31/2018 4:49:52 PM PDT by dynachrome (When an empire dies, you are left with vast monuments in front of which peasants squat to defecate)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Wonder Warthog
It does but the courts ruled for injunctive relief for Denver's fascist gun laws. Boulder may have to go to court to get the same if they impose these new laws.

Local Authority to Regulate Firearms in Colorado Last updated November 7, 2017.

10 posted on 03/31/2018 5:07:41 PM PDT by TigersEye (This is the age of the death of reason.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: george76

Colorado ping


11 posted on 03/31/2018 5:09:04 PM PDT by TigersEye (This is the age of the death of reason.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: flamberge

Texas anticipated this kind of BS and wrote the law so it could not be changed by local authorities.


12 posted on 03/31/2018 5:34:41 PM PDT by Feckless (The US Gubbmint / This Tagline CENSORED by FR \ IrOnic, ain't it?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: shelterguy

AR14. Is that the one that only holds detachable magazines of 10 rounds or less?


13 posted on 03/31/2018 5:54:05 PM PDT by Sasparilla ( I'm Not Tired of Winning)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Sasparilla

It’s a fully automatic that uses high magazine clips.


14 posted on 03/31/2018 6:00:09 PM PDT by shelterguy (Bigdeal)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: dynachrome; TigersEye; MileHi; Balata; bboop; Benito Cereno; BulletBobCo; bravo whiskey; Carley; ...

Colorado Ping ( Let me know if you wish to be added or removed from the list.)


15 posted on 03/31/2018 6:11:15 PM PDT by george76 (Ward Churchill : Fake Indian, Fake Scholarship, and Fake Art)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: flamberge

Boulder. 5 square miles surrounded by reality. Another reason never to visit. However I do not believe they can ban transport of loaded firearms. Denver tried to nullify the state law that you can carry in your car without a permit. They lost. As long as someone s only passing through and not stopping in city limits the state law applies. Get out of your car it’s a different story.


16 posted on 03/31/2018 6:19:30 PM PDT by Mom MD ( .)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: shelterguy

Wasn’t there a Colorado state law that prevented cities from coming up with their own patchwork of gun laws? I think the state law was put in place because of what Denver was doing.


17 posted on 03/31/2018 6:20:15 PM PDT by MtnClimber (For photos of Colorado scenery and wildlife, click on my screen name for my FR home page.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: flamberge

I’m sure CO has a state pre-emption law that forbids counties and municipalities from enacting gun laws stricter than that allowed by state law.

If Boulder passes this ordinance, expect the NRA to sue to get it overturned. Its not allowed to do it.

And in CO, anti-gun politicians have lost their seats. This is mainly a rural state Denver-Boulder notwithstanding.


18 posted on 03/31/2018 7:21:10 PM PDT by goldstategop (In Memory Of A Dearly Beloved Friend Who Lives In My Heart Forever)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: flamberge

Is there any state preemption in Colorado?

CC


19 posted on 03/31/2018 7:30:10 PM PDT by Celtic Conservative (Do you know what really burns my ass? A flame about 3 feet high.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: flamberge
Additionally, the ordinance forbids transport of loaded firearms within the city- which renders a CCW permit largely useless.

At the very least, that one violates state law.

20 posted on 03/31/2018 10:17:45 PM PDT by MileHi (Liberalism is an ideology of parasites, hypocrites, grievance mongers, victims, and control freaks.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-35 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson