Posted on 02/07/2017 4:28:25 PM PST by SoFloFreeper
I thought Conservatives were anti-science.
“For either one of them to sabotage himself or herself sexually, would be a kind of fraud.”
And IMHO, render a sacramental marriage invalid...
The problem is Tennessee and other states will welcome the baby killers. The states on the border will take the money for sure. I wish it was also illegal to cross state lines.
Imagine a minute a pregnant girl divorcing and going with a pimp to abort the father’s boy. Then again, imagine a woman divorced by a man because she would not have an abortion.
Watch out,the media and liberals are spinning things again, calling refugee what is a Terrorist organization of baby murder for parts.
What about a bill to punish the pimps and rapists for getting her pregnant and forcing them to pay pregnancy support? The language in these legislations is a big set up to fail. Why? Who are the betraying lawyers?
Not according to the news report on that bill I saw last night.
I have no idea and who comes up with these bills.
Personally I would not force any woman to have a child that was the result of being raped.
A man protecting his child from murder. Good.
I know you are bothered by her decision, which I wouldn’t have done, but I hope at some point you can forgive her. Not forgiving someone is a huge burden to carry. Do you have any children, or was her decision even before that?
A sacramental marriage can’t be rendered invalid. You either have one or you don’t (and yes I know about the abuses and the scandal that most marriage tribunals have caused- they will have to answer for that before God).
Having said that- if you are protestant then no need to argue this point, I understand you have a different view of marriage from what a Catholic should.
“A sacramental marriage can’t be rendered invalid.”
Her willingness to go down this path would suggest she did not take her vows seriously in the first place. It would be that that would render it invalid...
Incidentally, I am a Catholic and that was many decades ago. And I’m still with her after 48 years...
I understand what your saying now. It was the wording that you use “rendered invalid” that implied a marriage was valid and became invalid due to a subsequent action that is confusing.
“implies the possibility of an invalid marriage” might be a better way of putting it.
PM to follow.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.