Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Wisconsin Insider on Recount: Expect MASSIVE DNC Voter Fraud to be Exposed
Gateway Pundit ^ | 11/18/2016 | Jim Hoft

Posted on 11/28/2016 4:03:38 PM PST by GilGil

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-104 next last
To: GilGil

That 5 million dollars is from Soros. Why doesn’t anyone know that? This a coup attempt by Soros . Stein is just a stooge

I’ll relax on December 19th when the electors vote until then the commies/democrats can still steal this election from Trump with Soros financed illegal recounts

This an attempted coup by soros and no one knows ,cares or is fighting this with lawyers:

Busted! Jill Stein’s Election Recount Is Being Paid For By a Bot!

http://redstatewatcher.com/article.asp?id=50879

Roger Stone on Twitter: “Jill Stein “recount funded by Soros

https://mobile.twitter.com/RogerJStoneJr/status/802230392493404160


41 posted on 11/28/2016 4:40:16 PM PST by Democrat_media (bots are donating to Jill Stein's website for the recount. Soros behind big scheme)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GilGil

This article is wrong.(which makes me wonder what else is wrong in it) According to the UNOFFICIAL official results, Trump won by 22,177 votes.

In looking at the Wisconsin recount procedures & checklist, it appears that the recount is what amounts to a forensic recount.

http://elections.wi.gov/sites/default/files/publication/65/recount_manual_11_2016_pdf_17034.pdf

page 6-10 #6
plus see checklist in appendix pages 8-11.

If these canvassers are going to be that thorough, I’m guessing fraud will be found, if this source is correct, or will they ?

With Wisconsin’s strict Voter ID law, I don’t understand how can there be that much fraud.

If these canvassers are this thorough, will they be able to make their deadline ?


42 posted on 11/28/2016 4:40:22 PM PST by stylin19a (obama = Fredo smart)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GilGil

1) Anytime you see 4Chan or 8Chan replace that mentally with “Random person on the internet”. No credibility.

2) There could be evidence of dead people voting and such. But there will be no way to link them to particular ballots, so the election result will not change by much if at all.


43 posted on 11/28/2016 4:40:38 PM PST by TennesseeProfessor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: OttawaFreeper

Check the US dollar amounts coming in to the Stein fund, run them thru a currency converter & see if they match Bahrain or Qatar.


44 posted on 11/28/2016 4:41:50 PM PST by WildHighlander57 ((WildHighlander57, returning after lurking since 2000)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: GilGil

Since nursing homes mentioned, per Kaiser Family Foundation, the number of persons in US nursing homes in 2014: 1,347,983. In Wisconsin: 27,171. That’s a lot of opportunities for fraud


45 posted on 11/28/2016 4:43:31 PM PST by mewzilla (I'll vote for the first guy who promises to mail in his SOTU addresses.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GilGil

But how do you how the people voted you would know what the illegal voted or the out of town person voted right. It is not written on the ballot. I feel like they are trying to get all the votes thrown out what else could you do.

These people are vile and I hope they reap what they sow.


46 posted on 11/28/2016 4:43:38 PM PST by funfan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Democrat_media

That 5 million dollars is from Soros. Why doesn’t anyone know that? This a coup attempt by Soros . Stein is just a stooge

________

What proof do you have it is from Soros?


47 posted on 11/28/2016 4:44:07 PM PST by GilGil (E. Deplorabus Unum)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: Ray76

Wisconsin does not keep a separate voter registry by party affiliation. In fact, it always used to be, maybe still is, that registration to vote may be made right at the polling place the day of the vote.

But they DO require positive voter identification. Used to be be recognition by the ballot clerk in small venues, or the verbal assertion by two persons known to the ballot clerk, that person was who he or she claimed to be. And for a long time it it was not even required that person be literate, but that an assistant could go into the booth with the applicant, read off the names of the candidates, and mark the ballot according to the selections of the applicant, and it was considered to be “legal”.

But like I say, probably a good many of these provisions have been challenged and presumedly changed since then.


48 posted on 11/28/2016 4:44:35 PM PST by alloysteel (Je suis deplorable.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: GilGil

A bot funded Stein’s recount.This was funded by one individual satan in the flesh Soros

This an attempted coup by soros and no one knows ,cares or is fighting this with lawyers:

Busted! Jill Stein’s Election Recount Is Being Paid For By a Bot!

http://redstatewatcher.com/article.asp?id=50879

Roger Stone on Twitter: “Jill Stein “recount funded by Soros

https://mobile.twitter.com/RogerJStoneJr/status/802230392493404160


49 posted on 11/28/2016 4:44:46 PM PST by Democrat_media (bots are donating to Jill Stein's website for the recount. Soros behind big scheme)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: GilGil

It’s a measure of obama’s unpopularity, along with the Leftist policies of obama/hillary, that The Donald won even in the face of rampant democrat cheating and ballot-stuffing.


50 posted on 11/28/2016 4:45:21 PM PST by Jack Hammer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GilGil

This an attempted coup by soros and no one knows ,cares or is fighting this with lawyers:

Busted! Jill Stein’s Election Recount Is Being Paid For By a Bot!

http://redstatewatcher.com/article.asp?id=50879

Roger Stone on Twitter: “Jill Stein “recount funded by Soros

https://mobile.twitter.com/RogerJStoneJr/status/802230392493404160


51 posted on 11/28/2016 4:45:43 PM PST by Democrat_media (bots are donating to Jill Stein's website for the recount. Soros behind big scheme)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: GilGil

Zzzzzzzzzzz


52 posted on 11/28/2016 4:46:14 PM PST by ChildOfThe60s ("If you can remember the 60s........you weren't really there")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GilGil

4chan??

How about a reliable source?


53 posted on 11/28/2016 4:46:24 PM PST by SE Mom (proud Screaming Eagle mom)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: johniegrad

No but why do you think they are going this route to help Trump heck no.


54 posted on 11/28/2016 4:46:33 PM PST by funfan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: Publius

Good and it shouldn’t be. And to have polling as your argument is ridiculous. Especially since people were known to give misinformation to pollsters as not to get harassed for supporting Trump.


55 posted on 11/28/2016 4:48:59 PM PST by funfan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: GilGil; vette6387; Nachum; HarleyLady27; Lumper20; flat; ZULU; Foolsgold; Doogle; Liz; ...

I would bet that almost every state had massive voter fraud, e.g., CA one of the most egregious with a State run by amoral RATs.


56 posted on 11/28/2016 4:49:30 PM PST by ExTexasRedhead
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Old_Grouch

Each voting district will determine the method. The SecState did not mandate any particular method but did rule out a statewide hand recount.


57 posted on 11/28/2016 4:49:42 PM PST by pfflier
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: GilGil

I don’t see how a recount would determine if voters are legal.


58 posted on 11/28/2016 4:53:41 PM PST by Raycpa
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CivilWarBrewing

Hmmmmm


59 posted on 11/28/2016 4:53:44 PM PST by Gamecock (Gun owner. Christian. Pro-American. Pro Law and Order. I am in the basket of deplorables.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: GilGil

“There is ZERO upside here for Stein. None! She will - - - - lose. “

This point is moot considering she lost the election long before she ever thought of a recount.

There’s something else going on here. One theory on one of the countless threads on the subject has to do with Stein’s wanting to out DNC fraud.

I do not see the whole gain vs risk on this. Just what could she gain to offset a sudden unexplained heart attack?

Or maybe if funding another election is her goal, then finding the assumed DNC fraud was never her intention.

Nonetheless, there is much mystery going on here.


60 posted on 11/28/2016 4:53:50 PM PST by redfreedom (The nation has been saved. Thank you Dear Lord. Long live President Trump!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-104 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson