Posted on 11/06/2016 1:52:52 AM PST by Trump20162020
A new Morning Call/Muhlenberg College poll shows Democrat Hillary Clinton with a 6-point lead among likely Pennsylvania voters, who also expressed some concerns about potential violence as the tense and tumultuous election draws to a close.
When third-party candidates are included, Clinton's lead narrows to 4 points. She drew 44 percent, with Trump at 40 percent, Libertarian Party nominee Gary Johnson at 7 percent and Green Party candidate Jill Stein at 2 percent.
(Excerpt) Read more at mcall.com ...
Notice how Morning Call is quick to note that Clinton went up one whole point in the head-to-head match up from last week, but conveniently fails to mention that she fell from a 6-point lead to a 4-point lead in the 4-way race. I'm sure that was accidental.
Let me guess: D + oversampled.
Very shifty there
D+7
https://assets.documentcloud.org/documents/3214611/Muhlenberg-College-Morning-Call-November-poll.pdf
1. Democrat........................................................... 47%
2. Republican.........................................................40%
3. Independent.......................................................10%
4. Other Party.......................................................... 2%
D +7? Toss it out.
It won’t be D +7 anywhere, especially in PA.
Polls show the race tied there or Trump slightly ahead.
Its an outlier.
From the internals:
Sample is D+7
Among those “unsure” Trump gets 18% and Crooked gets just 7%
Something does not make any sense here, there is more than 10% of Independents in PA. So this poll somehow makes them irrelevant.
I am retired but used to work in the Allentown/Bethlehem area.Nothing here but another liberal college trying to toot it’s third-chair horn.
Even their lying poll’s internals show undecided voters breaking 2:1 for Trump.
Hillary can’t win PA with that kind of split.
Who do they think they’re kidding?
If you dig deep, you discover the data doesn’t show Hillary ahead.
Just the opposite. I’m calling PA for Trump.
Zero didn’t win by 6% over Willard (it was 5%), and Willard wasn’t even running a campaign to win. Trump will easily get more votes than Willard, so this poll can be dismissed out of hand.
Hillary can’t win PA with that kind of split.
Who do they think they’re kidding?
As I see it, it’s all about setting up the narrative for massive voter fraud out of Philly. And if that doesn’t work then about setting up the ‘reasons’ for going to court and getting their way there.
In 2012, Gary Johnson won 0.87% and Jill Stein 0.37% of the Pennsylvania vote.
My guess is most of the "Gary Johnson" vote and some of the "Jill Stein" vote goes to Trump.
The Johnson 7% is another clue the poll is garbage.
If he gets more than 2% in PA I would be stunned.
Meme: Polling malpractice
I’d be looking for recent large grants and/or ‘research’ contracts Muhlenberg College has received.
Colleges never do things on their own dime, unless it’s to implement silly-assed SJW rules and the like.
Keep Pat Caddell’s admonition in mind: any poll with the name College/University in it is worthless.
I have a Bachelor’s degree from this raging leftwing school.
Just to give you an idea how leftist it is. It is made up of ninety nine percent white student body, nearly ALL snow flakes, metrosexuals from New York long island.
They recently did a national search for a new college president that absolutely required to be black. They found someone that claims to be black but has lighter skin than Sean King or Rachel Dolezal.
The new president was tasked with making the school at least 5-10 percent black within the next 4 years. So far, it has been a complete total failure, just like this poll.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.