Skip to comments.Washington Times columnist fired after confirming 2 of the now 8 Cruz mistresses [should be 5]
Posted on 03/27/2016 2:14:11 AM PDT by Future Useless Eater
After the Washington Times quickly disassociated from him "for saying a scandal may be true", Johnson seemed to still be a class act. He tweeted that he respected them and had enjoyed working with them. He did not understand though why they would do this via Twitter instead of a phone call or even an email.
However, now there are attempts to smear and discredit him, claiming they have not had a relationship with him in over a year which he soon replied to providing proof of being paid just last month.
(Excerpt) Read more at examiner.com ...
Still Report # 736 - Enquirer: 3 More Cruz Babes
"Still Report # 737 - Mistakes Made on the Cruz Sex Scandal Story"
Bill Clinton’s back!
He didn’t “confirm.” He sent a tweet. Confirmation requires evidence. And calling the guy a “writer” is intended imply that he was a reporter. But he wrote opinion pieces on topics such as government waste.
Trump should hire him.
A suspicious person might think the GOP was holding this to release in order to knock Cruz out after he had won the caucuses where his organization gave him a good chance to win. Now there are a bunch of elections in northern states where they want Kasich to be the only alternative to Trump. Of course that would mean they were only using Trump to get an open convention so they could foist someone other than Trump or Cruz on us. Nah, that’s just paranoid.
Above should read “only using Cruz”, not Trump. It’s late.
In a nutshell, this is why the GOPe were totally comfortable supporting Cruz. They had a poison pill prepared.
No matter what Romney and Bush might say, there was no way they'd support Cruz all the way. They always planned on having someone else get selected at a Brokered Convention, and thus the story was meant to come out the moment it was for certain that Trump had not breached the minimum cutoff.
For that matter, the GOPe would probably have blamed the leak on a sour Trump.
Trump and Cruz have to combine forces. But chances of that happening? LOL.
You are the second Freeper to suggest this ( could be the first and I only read you second).
There is more supporting (but not 100% damning) evidence today from a writer who said Heidi insisted on only male staffers. So there!
We know Ted’s not gay.
Agreed. It still hasn't dawned on the "off the charts brilliant" guy in the room that he's been played for the patsy. The establishment snickers behind his back all the while. Such a tool!
I think Cruz never had a chance at a first round win and the GOPe never needed a poison pill.
The Cruz missal thwarts their plan to siphon delegates from Trump, does not advance it. Re-think your conspiracy theory.
Well, no doubt now!
Rethink your own conspiracy theory. If Trump is denied on the first round, then the delegates are free to vote for whomever. It won't be Cruz. Cruz served his purpose which was to deny Trump a first round victory and open the convention to the machinations of the GOPe.
The candidate will be romney, or kasich, or ryan. They may even drag jeb! back in.
Uh, did you read my post? That is what I said.
Wow, that’s some very strong support, at least for me. I’ll have to look for that one.
If you do find that quote, please post a link here. I’d really like to read more about it.
A lone tweet by an Atlanta talk radio guy seems to be it.
Hopefully more will come out on this, one way or the other.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.