Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Five Reasons To Reconsider The Ruger Mini-14
dailycaller.com ^ | 3/23/2016 | Brian Sheetz

Posted on 03/26/2016 5:51:49 AM PDT by rktman

When it comes to .223 Rem. semi-automatic rifles, Ruger’s Mini-14 has long been one of the obvious choices. And it’s no wonder, considering it offers nearly the same handiness as the M1 Carbine, the ballistics of the AR15, and the feel of the classic M1 Garand and M14. The Mini’s popularity confirms its strong perceived relevance among a wide range of users, and sustained sales for more than 40 years is evidence of its sound design—even if it’s unfairly judged by the same criteria as today’s predominant platform, the AR, which enjoys the huge advantages of U.S. military adoption and unlimited manufacturing sources. So while some consider the Mini a bit dowdy or lowly, it is actually a serious standout worth giving a second look. Here are just five of the many reasons why a Mini Ranch, Tactical, Target or Thirty model should be on your short list the next time you shop for a modern rifle:

(Excerpt) Read more at dailycaller.com ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Constitution/Conservatism
KEYWORDS: 2a; banglist; mini14
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-112 next last
To: rktman

Got rid of my minis when ruger told me I had to send it to the factory for a new firing pin and no, they wouldn’t sell me any spares. Ruger is, or was really good at saying screw you to their customers.


21 posted on 03/26/2016 6:25:05 AM PDT by BudgieRamone (Everybody loves a bonk on the head.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Riley

Ditto. I had 2, the 2nd was the Ranch version so I could add a scope. The result was that I could more easily see the crappy accuracy. All pre-2005. Got an AR, and now I’m happy. I do wish that Ruger had done some honor to Garand’s action by having a decent barrel many years earlier, but that’s life.

When Bill Ruger came out in favor of mag limit, that poisoned me against the company. Lots of other ones out there.


22 posted on 03/26/2016 6:25:32 AM PDT by Ancesthntr ("The right to buy weapons is the right to be free." A. E. van Vogt)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: dartuser

No, its NOT.

Its chambered for .223. Ruger will tell you so. You can go ahead use 5.56, but you are going to find accuracy falls off due to the higher pressure. Call Ruger if you don’t believe me, they will strongly recommend you not use the military round.

The weapon was designed to digest .223 and its very accurate with that round.


23 posted on 03/26/2016 6:29:41 AM PDT by Frederick_Barbarossa
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Lurker
Wow ... a quick search provides no insight to this question. My buddy has a Ranch and his is stamped 5.56 ...

Perhaps some variation in models ...

24 posted on 03/26/2016 6:31:20 AM PDT by dartuser
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: dartuser

25 posted on 03/26/2016 6:34:52 AM PDT by central_va (I won't be reconstructed and I do not give a damn.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: rktman

As I recall. when the mini-14 came out, Bill Ruger described it as a “plinker”. In that role it has done me a fine job for years. It was not intended to for MOA shots. Some of you guys are starting to sound like: I got rid of my 1022 because it wouldn’t knock down a elk with a single shot.


26 posted on 03/26/2016 6:37:23 AM PDT by lrdg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: lrdg

“... it wouldn’t knock down a elk with a single shot..” Well if you reload your .22’s properly they will. LOL!


27 posted on 03/26/2016 6:40:36 AM PDT by rktman (Enlisted in the Navy in '67 to protect folks rights to strip my rights. WTH?!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: dartuser

My stainless mini-14 is stamped .223.


28 posted on 03/26/2016 6:40:39 AM PDT by fulltlt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: Riley

Same here. My AR is a tack driver. Mini 14s were known for being sloppy shooters. Plus you cant get stuff like a firing pin or anything. All repairs have to be sent back to Ruger. AR type you can buy everything from mags to springs online and cheap.
Also, The A team used them all the time and never hit anything but gas tanks and tires. What good is that


29 posted on 03/26/2016 6:41:26 AM PDT by Yorlik803 ( Church/Caboose in 2016)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: central_va

So the casings are virtually identical. What about the standard powder load?


30 posted on 03/26/2016 6:43:15 AM PDT by IronJack
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: Tupelo

“I think for most modern shooters, the biggest problem with the mini-14 is, it does not look “bad” enough.”

I sold my mini-14 ... not because it didn’t look “Bad”, but because the AR15 is just more fun to shoot .... no recoil, more comfortable...

.... plus after 6 yrs in National Guard I can disassemble the AR blindfolded .... even 30 yrs after retirement


31 posted on 03/26/2016 6:43:31 AM PDT by teppe (... for my God ... for my Family ... for my Country ....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: IronJack

Compared to the Cruz 8, the powder load is light


32 posted on 03/26/2016 6:45:11 AM PDT by bert ((K.E.; N.P.; GOPc;+12, 73, ....carson is the kinder gentler trump.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: Riley

“Had one. Even benched and bagged at a mere 100 yards, it was shooting pie-tin sized groups, at best. Got rid of it.”

Couldn’t it be tuned at all?


33 posted on 03/26/2016 6:46:12 AM PDT by dljordan (WhoVoltaire: "To find out who rules over you, simply find out who you are not allowed to criticize.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: IronJack

The neck gauge thickness is different between the two. Look closer. .251 vs .253.


34 posted on 03/26/2016 6:46:32 AM PDT by central_va (I won't be reconstructed and I do not give a damn.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: rktman

Went out shooting with a bro in law, a Marine Master Gunny Sgt. He had a Mini 14. He spent the afternoon trying to tug the action open to eject jammed rounds.

I decided not to consider a Mini 14 for interesting emergencies.


35 posted on 03/26/2016 6:50:39 AM PDT by lurk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rktman

At a gun show I was told that a 30carbine round is equivalent to a 357 magnum in hitting power.


36 posted on 03/26/2016 6:51:18 AM PDT by SkyDancer ("Nobody Said I Was Perfect But Yet Here I Am")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rktman

The latest Mini 14’s are chambered 5.56 NATO/.223


37 posted on 03/26/2016 6:54:35 AM PDT by TTFlyer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: central_va

0.002 inches? 0.05 mm? That could be just wear and tear on the resizing die.

Maybe I’m a fool, but I’ve always used 5.56 and .223 brass interchangeably. And I’ve never noticed any difference in accuracy with the different brass and the same powder charge and bullet.

I’d be interested in hearing the experience of other reloaders. Or people who may have been reloaders before their unfortunate canoeing accidents.


38 posted on 03/26/2016 6:59:31 AM PDT by IronJack
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: SkyDancer

Out of the longer barrel of an M1 carbine, the .30 carbine round does compare favorably with the .357 or many other handgun rounds fired from a handgun length barrel...which should really come as no surprise. The M1 carbine was in many ways, the first “PDW,” designed for those personnel who would have normally been issued a sidearm only (i.e. mechanics, mortar crews, cooks, etc.)


39 posted on 03/26/2016 7:00:28 AM PDT by Joe 6-pack (Qui me amat, amat et canem meum.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: rktman
I didn't like the AR15 and couldn't afford an HK, so I was a Mini-14 owner/operator for about 20 years of my life. I had three different Minis, all in stainless (the last being an all-weather version). Accuracy wasn't all that bad if I kept the barrel from heating up, but groups opened up considerably if I fired steadily. Reliability was good with the flush factory mags, and it was like the old standby 94 Winchester in that it was overall very handy, compact and relatively "slick."

In those days, reliable hi-cap Mini-14 magazines were hard to find, and the repair parts situation was (as mentioned up-thread) "typically Ruger." I don't like cleaning rifles from the muzzle, but that's a personal issue.

In the end, I sold the last one and used the proceedings to go AR. I still don't have any great feelings towards the ARs - I also consider them overpriced for a firearm that is essentially disposable - but the good ones are reliable and accurate; parts/mags are easily had and they are as modular as the day is long.

Sometimes I still get a hankering for a Mini-14, but so far the feeling always passes. If I still had one, I'd probably use it and make the best out of the situation, as they aren't bad little carbines.

Mr. niteowl77

40 posted on 03/26/2016 7:04:33 AM PDT by niteowl77
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-112 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson