Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Five Reasons To Reconsider The Ruger Mini-14
dailycaller.com ^ | 3/23/2016 | Brian Sheetz

Posted on 03/26/2016 5:51:49 AM PDT by rktman

When it comes to .223 Rem. semi-automatic rifles, Ruger’s Mini-14 has long been one of the obvious choices. And it’s no wonder, considering it offers nearly the same handiness as the M1 Carbine, the ballistics of the AR15, and the feel of the classic M1 Garand and M14. The Mini’s popularity confirms its strong perceived relevance among a wide range of users, and sustained sales for more than 40 years is evidence of its sound design—even if it’s unfairly judged by the same criteria as today’s predominant platform, the AR, which enjoys the huge advantages of U.S. military adoption and unlimited manufacturing sources. So while some consider the Mini a bit dowdy or lowly, it is actually a serious standout worth giving a second look. Here are just five of the many reasons why a Mini Ranch, Tactical, Target or Thirty model should be on your short list the next time you shop for a modern rifle:

(Excerpt) Read more at dailycaller.com ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Constitution/Conservatism
KEYWORDS: 2a; banglist; mini14
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-112 next last
Love mine. Well, if I actually had one. Tippe canoe blah blah blah. Lots of accessories and a couple extra choices as far as caliber you prefer.
1 posted on 03/26/2016 5:51:49 AM PDT by rktman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: rktman
When it comes to .223 Rem. semi-automatic rifles, Ruger’s Mini-14 has long been one of the obvious choices.

It is actually chambered in 5.56 ...

2 posted on 03/26/2016 5:53:19 AM PDT by dartuser
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rktman

Had one. Even benched and bagged at a mere 100 yards, it was shooting pie-tin sized groups, at best. Got rid of it.

The article says that the ones after 2005 are much better,, but I don’t have the budget to find out right now.


3 posted on 03/26/2016 6:00:12 AM PDT by Riley (The Fourth Estate is the Fifth Column.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rktman

Ditto.

A survey of experienced Iraq and Afghanistan Army vets found that for close-up urban warfare, a full 50% would prefer a Mini-14 to an AR-15! I sure would.......but for anything beyond 100’ you need the AR for accuracy.......

And yes, if you have a Mini-14, you HAVE to get a Mini-Thirty.......

The simple Garand action is hard to beat for reliability, ruggedness and simplicity.......


4 posted on 03/26/2016 6:05:08 AM PDT by Arlis
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rktman

If it took standard AR mags would be a plus.


5 posted on 03/26/2016 6:07:47 AM PDT by SolidRedState (I used to think bizarro world was a fiction.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rktman
It's not scary looking:

In contrast to the former, most versions of the Mini have a sporter-like profile and some feature wood stocks, making them right at home in saddle scabbards, pickup trucks and, more importantly, in the minds of many for whom the sight of a traditional rifle is less likely to arouse unwanted attention.

6 posted on 03/26/2016 6:08:09 AM PDT by IndispensableDestiny
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dartuser

LOL! Yeah, it’s one of those “Is it safe to shoot .223 in it or only 5.56 cause it explode in my face” deals. The mini is way tough enough. I seem to remember a thread quite a while ago about chamber pressures for both but don’t recall the details. If I remember correctly the .223 has higher pressures. I’m sure someone will educate me/us once again. So, thanks in advance :>)


7 posted on 03/26/2016 6:08:35 AM PDT by rktman (Enlisted in the Navy in '67 to protect folks rights to strip my rights. WTH?!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: rktman

I think for most modern shooters, the biggest problem with the mini-14 is, it does not look “bad” enough.


8 posted on 03/26/2016 6:10:25 AM PDT by Tupelo (we vote - THEY decide.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rktman

I think 556 is the military round and has the higher pressure. If it safely fires 556 then it fires 223 but not vice versa.


9 posted on 03/26/2016 6:10:59 AM PDT by central_va (I won't be reconstructed and I do not give a damn.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: rktman

If you’re close enough to hit something with a mini-14, then you’re close enough to use a shotgun instead - or just throw the damned thing and try to clock the perp in the head.


10 posted on 03/26/2016 6:11:02 AM PDT by Sirius Lee (Trump <s>Cruz</s> or Lose 2016)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SolidRedState

I prominently marked all my mags with the appropriate weapon they go to. I may have to mark them even further. LOL!


11 posted on 03/26/2016 6:11:18 AM PDT by rktman (Enlisted in the Navy in '67 to protect folks rights to strip my rights. WTH?!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Riley
Even benched and bagged at a mere 100 yards, it was shooting pie-tin sized groups, at best.

I had the opposite experience with one a friend let me try out. Quarter sized groups at 100yds. Liked it a lot.

12 posted on 03/26/2016 6:11:26 AM PDT by Paine in the Neck (Socialism consumes EVERYTHING)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: rktman

The “NATO” designator means the increased powder for higher pressures.


13 posted on 03/26/2016 6:12:28 AM PDT by SgtHooper (If you remember the 60's, YOU WEREN'T THERE!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: IndispensableDestiny

Plus, you can put lipstick on it and make it look evil if you want to or continue to go in stealth mode.


14 posted on 03/26/2016 6:12:38 AM PDT by rktman (Enlisted in the Navy in '67 to protect folks rights to strip my rights. WTH?!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: central_va

LOL! Kinda like .38 in a .357 but not the other way around.


15 posted on 03/26/2016 6:13:43 AM PDT by rktman (Enlisted in the Navy in '67 to protect folks rights to strip my rights. WTH?!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: rktman

Have one. Nice rifle. Maybe I got a lemon but it’s accuracy is acceptable, on par with an AK 47 which was it’s purpose. Baseball size groups, off hand, open sights at 100 yds works for me.


16 posted on 03/26/2016 6:15:20 AM PDT by Eagles6 ( Valley Forge Redux. If not now, when? If not here, where? If not us then who?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rktman
LOL! Kinda like .38 in a .357 but not the other way around.

Exactly. Most 223 weapons can handle the higher pressure. It is just most manufactures will not guarantee satisfactory results. The weapon will wear out faster and become inaccurate sooner.

17 posted on 03/26/2016 6:16:19 AM PDT by central_va (I won't be reconstructed and I do not give a damn.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: rktman

The mini-14 can actually handle both .223 Remington and 5.56 NATO; it is one of its attractions.


18 posted on 03/26/2016 6:17:01 AM PDT by ought-six (Multiculturalism is national suicide, and political correctness is the cyanide capsule.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dartuser

“It is actually chambered in 5.56 .”

Then Ruger made a mistake on Mrs. L’s Stainless Ranch.

L


19 posted on 03/26/2016 6:18:00 AM PDT by Lurker (Violence is rarely the answer. But when it is it is the only answer.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: central_va

Crap. You just added to my troubles. I’m already an inaccurate shooter now it’s compounded. LOL! Or, maybe it’ll make up the difference and offset each other making me a marksman.


20 posted on 03/26/2016 6:23:12 AM PDT by rktman (Enlisted in the Navy in '67 to protect folks rights to strip my rights. WTH?!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-112 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson