Posted on 02/29/2016 11:31:35 AM PST by wagglebee
Notice the media even back then along with Hollywood stars and public officials were quick to say this was not a homosexual disease?
Why is the question would anyone want homosexuals to give blood knowing the diseases it comes with and how many risks for those in the medical field have to put up with?
I agree.
“reasons for” blacks to have a “higher lifetime risk” of contracting HIV/AIDS “include higher prevalence within the community ... lack of access to health care; poverty; and stigma.”
“Prison rape is the first thing people think of when thinking of prisons.”
Over 30% of black males in DC are in prison, on probation, or on parole. In sections of the city, over 10% of all residents are HIV+.
The down low runs deep there.
Isn’t that racist?
Has the other half complained about discrimination yet? “Why don’t I get my share of that?”
Damn!
whats the matter with the other half? can’t they catch it too?
And all American taxpayers will pay for the treatment of the HIV infected black gay men.
Medical insurance will skyrocket no matter who is president and plans offered.
Keep your pee pee out of the poo poo.
When my son went to the University of Texas the rate of HIV was about 2%. I explained to him that you do not “Fu__k male butt nor shoot drugs. He is not HIV positive and married to a screaming hot lady that has given me the most wonderfull granddaughter. That little lady will be defended by me. Touch her wrongly and you would wish you were dead.
It is a grandfather thing. We get angry,
Thanks for the ping.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.