Posted on 01/08/2016 8:16:13 AM PST by doug from upland
Has the State Department released a smoking gun in the Hillary Clinton e-mail scandal? In a thread from June 2011, Hillary exchanges e-mails with Jake Sullivan, then her deputy chief of staff and now her campaign foreign-policy adviser, in which she impatiently waits for a set of talking points. When Sullivan tells her that the source is having trouble with the secure fax, Hillary then orders Sullivan to have the data stripped of its markings and sent through a non-secure channel.
That should be game, set, and match, yes?
Hillary was nervous as heck a while back when Sullivan
s name first came up in the email investigation. As casually as they address the fax problem here, it doesn’t sound like stripping the markings was a one-time goof but rather a common hack.
Just because they were going to send talking points on a secure fax doesnt mean they were classified. We need confirmation.
They could find a Clinton sodomizing Nuns or small children with a 2x4 and many Democrats wouldn’t care or want to prosecute.
BAM!
No.
The MSM will never give this the repeat pounding necessary to make it stick. The GOP nominee will have to do the work, & without the threat of the prison time this &%$ deserves.
JAIL!
non-paper(Noun)A discussion paper which is not to form part of formal business especially in the UN
non-paper(Adjective)Not made of paper
non-paper(Adjective)Used of infomation that is stored electronically
Jake Sullivan’s the smoking gun...
Obama can’t stand Hillary...
What would “w no identifying heading” mean?
Read your comment:
Or want to participate. ;-)
She’s impaired, she leaks (and I’m not talking about that debate pit stop), and she’s a cinch to be nominated. What a country.
Looks like she was using at least 2 different email addresses in this exchange. I thought part of her “defense” was that she did not want to complicate her life by using various email addresses. ??
I’d need a lot more information to draw firm conclusions, but “Turn it into a nonpaper” would be interpreted by most staffers as meaning to sanitize it to an unclassified form, so i’m not sure this is as damning as it might appear. No staffer is going to just strip off the classification markings and send it plain text without going through their security officer or intel analyst to ensure that the plain text does not contain classified information.
The HEAD of the FBI will surrender to his bosses.
The employees? The investigators?
Frankly, I don’t know.
Interesting that the subject field is redacted.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.