Skip to comments.Gun Control Group Tells Followers To “SWAT” Gun Owners
Posted on 12/16/2015 10:30:59 AM PST by rktman
The Coalition to Stop Gun Violence (CSGV) is a radical gun control group with a long history of considering gun ownership to be near treasonous, and who routinely refers to gun owners as âinsurrectionists.â
Twice this year they called upon their followers to âSWATâ gun owners.
SWATting is the practice of making a 911 call in order to draw police attention to someone you donât suspect of committing a crime.
(Excerpt) Read more at bearingarms.com ...
insurrectionists fought and gained our freedom from England. Today’s socalled “liberals” would be the tories of yesterday who would rat everyone out to the British soldiers. Shameful.
Misprision of a felony?
. That will stop "swatting" in its tracks.
You gotta think that cops dislike it when they’re used in this way...
Last time I checked, SWATTING was slightly ILLEGAL..........................
In most jurisdictions, what this clowns are proposing could make them an accessory to murder.
In fact, if they were to SWAT someone, and the SWATted person were to take a life in self-defense, the victim might never see a day in jail while they could go in for life.
In some populated, liberal areas, cops might like this, as they get to add to their personal collection when raids go bad.
“You gotta think that cops dislike it when theyâre used in this way...”
Some might relish the opportunity to turn out in armor with an MRAP, flashbangs, dogs and battering rams. Not all, mind you...
Sadly, ‘they’ don’t care just as long as a gun is taken off the street.
This means ‘OPEN SEASON ON DOGS!!!’
Too many departments really like to SWAT. They regularly SWAT on statements of druggies they know to be unreliable. If they can get one such to say that any address that comes to mind is a drug dealing center they will SWAT it and claim it to be a righteous mistake later.
Those that call in false emergencies that result in the victims getting injured should be executed. There should be a death penalty for those that call the police with these complaints and accusations. Liberals won’t like this but it would stop it in its tracks.
[[Could that lead to someone being charged with a crime. Such as the caller? ]]
No no- it’s only a crime IF someone talks icky about muslims, Loretta lynch said so
It is illegal and the group should be charged. Anyone who is a victim of this should sue them.
I’m thinking multi-million dollar lawsuits if there are injuries or deaths.
Much of this over-reaction can be laid at the feet of “polezei locus”.
In Michigan, open carry is legal. Not long ago, my neighbor had a visitor from Indiana with a belt-holstered Glock-9.
Me, (not being reactionary), wondered whether the visitor needed to identify to the local constabulary, so I called the DPS. DPS told me that it is considered a professional courtesy to do so.
Next thing I know, the local DPS showed up next door, tackled the guy and just summarily “abused” him (they used GPS locationing from my house phone).
Although I felt somewhat responsible, I did not expect such an over-reaction.
Maybe next time, I’ll just go ask the gun-owner about his weapon and leave DPS out of it..
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.