Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

"By any means necessary." Could that lead to someone being charged with a crime. Such as the caller?
1 posted on 12/16/2015 10:31:00 AM PST by rktman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-26 next last
To: rktman

insurrectionists fought and gained our freedom from England. Today’s socalled “liberals” would be the tories of yesterday who would rat everyone out to the British soldiers. Shameful.


2 posted on 12/16/2015 10:33:00 AM PST by realcleanguy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: rktman

Misprision of a felony?


3 posted on 12/16/2015 10:33:55 AM PST by E. Pluribus Unum ("We are not a nation of immigrants. We are a nation of citizens." -- Mark Levin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: rktman
This is easy to stop. Take detailed info from the caller and make sure you (the cops) know exactly who they are...and then when the info proves to be false...put them in jail.

. That will stop "swatting" in its tracks.

4 posted on 12/16/2015 10:35:14 AM PST by NELSON111
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: rktman

Last time I checked, SWATTING was slightly ILLEGAL..........................


6 posted on 12/16/2015 10:39:42 AM PST by Red Badger (READ MY LIPS: NO MORE BUSHES!...............)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: rktman
The LAUSD evacuation yesterday was probably the largest SWATting in history.

In most jurisdictions, what this clowns are proposing could make them an accessory to murder.

In fact, if they were to SWAT someone, and the SWATted person were to take a life in self-defense, the victim might never see a day in jail while they could go in for life.

7 posted on 12/16/2015 10:40:05 AM PST by wideawake
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: rktman

Making entirely fabricated and false 9-1-1 calls should be punished very, very, very seriously. Innocent people can get killed because police either get trigger-happy and/or because police, fire, and rescue personnel are tragically delayed when a REAL event (like a traffic accident) occurs on the other side of town.

11 posted on 12/16/2015 10:41:39 AM PST by Blue Jays (Rock Hard, Ride Free)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: rktman

This means ‘OPEN SEASON ON DOGS!!!’


13 posted on 12/16/2015 10:43:24 AM PST by CivilWarBrewing (u)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: rktman

Those that call in false emergencies that result in the victims getting injured should be executed. There should be a death penalty for those that call the police with these complaints and accusations. Liberals won’t like this but it would stop it in its tracks.


15 posted on 12/16/2015 10:44:50 AM PST by vetvetdoug
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: rktman

[[Could that lead to someone being charged with a crime. Such as the caller? ]]

No no- it’s only a crime IF someone talks icky about muslims, Loretta lynch said so


16 posted on 12/16/2015 10:45:23 AM PST by Bob434
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: rktman

It is illegal and the group should be charged. Anyone who is a victim of this should sue them.


18 posted on 12/16/2015 10:46:18 AM PST by joshua c (Please dont feed the liberals)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: rktman

I’m thinking multi-million dollar lawsuits if there are injuries or deaths.


19 posted on 12/16/2015 10:47:53 AM PST by Perseverando (For Progressives, Islamonazis & other Totalitarians: It's all about PEOPLE CONTROL!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: rktman; cripplecreek

Much of this over-reaction can be laid at the feet of “polezei locus”.

In Michigan, open carry is legal. Not long ago, my neighbor had a visitor from Indiana with a belt-holstered Glock-9.

Me, (not being reactionary), wondered whether the visitor needed to identify to the local constabulary, so I called the DPS. DPS told me that it is considered a professional courtesy to do so.

Next thing I know, the local DPS showed up next door, tackled the guy and just summarily “abused” him (they used GPS locationing from my house phone).

Although I felt somewhat responsible, I did not expect such an over-reaction.

Maybe next time, I’ll just go ask the gun-owner about his weapon and leave DPS out of it..


20 posted on 12/16/2015 10:48:18 AM PST by Cletus.D.Yokel (Catastophic Anthropogenic Climate Alterations: The acronym defines the science.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: rktman

Unfortunately, the cops like the opportunity to check someone out. Even if the gun situation is legal, they may find something else to cite them for.

Police dispatch already treats calls about someone carrying a gun as a legitimate complaint, even if the caller doesn’t indicate any illegal activity like brandishing AND even if it’s an open carry state.


21 posted on 12/16/2015 10:48:26 AM PST by fruser1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: rktman

Note that these cowards don’t confront anyone on their own.


22 posted on 12/16/2015 10:49:14 AM PST by onedoug
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: rktman

What can happen to the innocent party. He mistakes the police intrusion for a criminal intrusion, and exercises his right to self defense, and the police exercise their right to their self defense.

The people who actually do this “swatting” need to be put in jail for the rest of their lives, and their property sued out from under them.


24 posted on 12/16/2015 10:53:45 AM PST by I want the USA back (Patriarchal binary all original-equipment breeder and White-privileged crusader.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: rktman

I would hope SWATing would be punished as harshly as flying an unregistered toy drone.


25 posted on 12/16/2015 10:55:50 AM PST by polymuser ( Enough is enough)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: rktman

The nature of the controversy is illustrated by just how far these people are willing to go - this action is (1) illegal, and (2) likely to get somebody killed. This is pure class warfare in a literal sense, and a death is regarded as a positive outcome so long as nobody inciting it gets caught. It isn’t about the guns, it’s about the gun owners, who are considered evil people deserving of death, and the candid activists will admit it. These are not non-violent people.


27 posted on 12/16/2015 10:58:00 AM PST by Billthedrill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: rktman

If the swatting results in death of the target, prosecute the swatter for first degreee murder. It is a premeditated act with the intent of directing deadly force at the victim. Death penalty for the swatter. Apply on an expedited schedule.


29 posted on 12/16/2015 11:04:11 AM PST by Myrddin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: rktman

Bump


31 posted on 12/16/2015 11:15:48 AM PST by lowbridge
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: rktman
SWATting is the practice of making a 911 call in order to draw police attention to someone you don't suspect of committing a crime.

Abusing the 911 system is a criminal offense in every jurisdiction I know of.


33 posted on 12/16/2015 11:19:26 AM PST by Buckeye McFrog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-26 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson