Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

PAUL RYAN UNCHAINED: LASHES OUT AT BREITBART, DRUDGE, ‘DON’T BELIEVE EVERYTHING ON THE INTERNET’
Breitbart.com ^ | 6-11-2015 | ALEX SWOYER

Posted on 06/11/2015 9:21:32 AM PDT by servo1969

FULL TITLE: PAUL RYAN UNCHAINED: LASHES OUT AT BREITBART, DRUDGE, ‘DON’T BELIEVE EVERYTHING YOU READ ON THE INTERNET’

You know you’re losing when you’re reduced to attacking the Internet.

House Ways and Means Committee chairman Rep. Paul Ryan is now attacking the Web, proving he shouldn’t be trusted by Republican members of Congress to tell the truth about controversial trade legislation.

In an appearance Thursday on Fox and Friends, Ryan criticized Breitbart News and other conservative media including the highly influential Drudge Report, which have revealed the immigration and climate change provisions within President Obama’s trade agenda.

“Let’s talk about trade. Very odd situation – the president is fighting without Rep. Nancy Pelosi, without Rep. Steny Hoyer, with republicans to get his trade authority passed through. You’ve already discovered through Breitbart and others that there were some provisions in there for climate change, provisions in there for immigration,” Brian Kilmeade asked. “You’ve looked to knock that out and push this forward. Where are you at with trade authority? And are you questioning your own support of it?”

Ryan responded by attacking Breitbart News and others on the internet, like the Drudge Report, which has hammered his support of Obamatrade as well.

(Excerpt) Read more at breitbart.com ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Constitution/Conservatism; Crime/Corruption; News/Current Events; US: California; US: Maryland; US: Wisconsin
KEYWORDS: alexswoyer; astroturf; breitbart; briankilmeade; california; curtisellis; drudgereport; maryland; nancypelosi; nottoobreitbart; obamatrade; obamatradedotcom; paul; paulryan; paulryanjudas; paultardation; paultardnoisemachine; randpaulnoisemachine; randsconcerntrolls; ryan; stenyhoyer; tisa; tpa; tpp; wikileaks; wisconsin
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 121-138 next last
To: servo1969

And I would say ... “Don’t trust everything the so-called Republicans tell you!”


61 posted on 06/11/2015 10:12:57 AM PDT by KalaSamy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: KalaSamy

http://www.stationcaster.com/player_skinned.php?s=2591&c=10771&f=4479793 (slide audio to 94:49 to hear Jeff Sessions on Levin show 6-10-15)


62 posted on 06/11/2015 10:14:47 AM PDT by sheikdetailfeather
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies]

To: servo1969
The GOP policy wonk so smart he couldn't out-debate brain-damaged Joe Biden.


63 posted on 06/11/2015 10:14:51 AM PDT by Paine in the Neck (Socialism consumes EVERYTHING)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pirate Ragnar

Nicely put....


64 posted on 06/11/2015 10:15:02 AM PDT by Norseman (Defund the Left....completely!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]

To: servo1969

There is not a single constituency that supports this bill on the left or right yet our so called leaders are going all out for it. What does that tell you ?


65 posted on 06/11/2015 10:15:17 AM PDT by sunrise_sunset
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: servo1969
Show us what's in the bill, Nancy Paul!!!
66 posted on 06/11/2015 10:17:29 AM PDT by NorthMountain ("The time has come", the Walrus said, "to talk of many things")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Paine in the Neck

MiTT picked a real winner huh?


67 posted on 06/11/2015 10:17:29 AM PDT by NormsRevenge (SEMPER FI!! - Monthly Donors Rock!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies]

To: Sasparilla
What in the heck is going on behind closed doors?

Treachery and treason.

There's always an excuse for it ...

68 posted on 06/11/2015 10:18:56 AM PDT by NorthMountain ("The time has come", the Walrus said, "to talk of many things")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Diogenesis

When things get really dicey in this country Obama and the Congress will cooperate with each other in the imposition of martial law over the people. The elites take care of themselves first and foremost. Its all about them, not us.


69 posted on 06/11/2015 10:19:34 AM PDT by Starboard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies]

To: servo1969

“Don’t believe everything on the internet. Believe me and Obama instead.”

Paul Ryan


70 posted on 06/11/2015 10:19:36 AM PDT by odawg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pirate Ragnar

Our daily jump the shark moment....

******************

True that. Good way to put it.


71 posted on 06/11/2015 10:20:24 AM PDT by Starboard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]

To: blueunicorn6

Ryan is a PUNK who’s been poisoned by the Washington koolaid.


72 posted on 06/11/2015 10:22:12 AM PDT by Kevin in California
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: KalaSamy

Ryan...Cantor Part Deux


73 posted on 06/11/2015 10:22:29 AM PDT by RckyRaCoCo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies]

To: servo1969

Your 15 minutes are up stooge Ryan.


74 posted on 06/11/2015 10:23:57 AM PDT by VideoDoctor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sunrise_sunset

What does that tell you ?

***************
It tells me they have lucrative lobbyist jobs waiting for them. They go from Main Street to K Street. Capitol Hill is just a stop over for them; a watering hole of sorts.


75 posted on 06/11/2015 10:24:03 AM PDT by Starboard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies]

To: Political Junkie Too

that was my thought too.


76 posted on 06/11/2015 10:24:58 AM PDT by Principled (Government Slowdown using the budget process!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: Mariner

“No we’re voting on a procedure,” Ryan said. “How does Congress consider trade agreements? Then in the fall, probably in the fall, we’ll consider a trade agreement—which hasn’t been completed yet. That’s why we don’t know what’s in it because it doesn’t exist yet.”

What part of this process do people criticizing Ryan not understand? Or is everyone criticizing just against free trade with other nations?

Repeating Ryan, this is not a vote on a negotiated trade agreement. This is a vote establishing how an up or down vote on the trade agreement that is finally negotiated between several nations will be handled in the U.S.

The final result agreed to between participating nations will be published for all to read, and lodge objection to, before it is voted on by a GOP-controlled Congress. If the final agreement is as bad as people are implying, Congress obviously won’t ratify it.

But again, if you’re just against free trade on principle, why not just say that and object on that basis, instead of objecting to provisions that aren’t before Congress for a vote. Those provisions, if they end up in the final, negotiated, agreement, will get plenty of discussion when the time comes but, as Ryan states, Congress in this authorization bill is trying to prohibit certain items from even being negotiated, i.e., climate change provisions and immigration provisions.

I don’t get the outrage, unless it’s just anti-free-trade, in which case just say so.


77 posted on 06/11/2015 10:29:12 AM PDT by Norseman (Defund the Left....completely!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: SkyDancer

Yes, The Ministry Of Propaganda tells us everything we need to know.....


78 posted on 06/11/2015 10:35:50 AM PDT by Lurkinanloomin (Know Islam, No Peace - No Islam, Know Peace)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]

To: Norseman

If the final agreement is as bad as people are implying, Congress obviously won’t ratify it.


You obviously have a lot more confidence in Congress than most. You are among less than 10% .


79 posted on 06/11/2015 10:40:43 AM PDT by Lurkinanloomin (Know Islam, No Peace - No Islam, Know Peace)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 77 | View Replies]

To: Norseman

“No we’re voting on a procedure,” Ryan said.

*********************

The Republican controlled senate also voted on a procedure concerning the Iran nuclear deal and how did that work out? The senate agreed to REVIEW the deal and approve or disapprove it within the somehow magical timeframe of 30 days. Of course, this “deal” is really a treaty in disguise and should have been made subject to the constitutionally prescribed approval process obtained by a two-thirds majority vote. Its no wonder that people have no trust or confidence in congress. Poll after poll shows that.


80 posted on 06/11/2015 10:43:23 AM PDT by Starboard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 77 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 121-138 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson