Posted on 03/12/2015 6:48:53 AM PDT by SeekAndFind
YET
Gee, I wonder if Hitlery was aware of this?
Judge Napolitano says it won’t be till sometime in 2017 or later because only the DOJ can compel Clinton to comply.
Shouldn’t they at least send a letter to the DOJ to ask for them to do it?
HAHAHAHAHA. You’re funny. A sternly worded letter perhaps?
As I have said, Gowdy is all bark and no bite.
So, you’re saying that he has legal authority to seize Clinton’s email servers?
The Obama Regime is a Criminal Enterprise.
Can anyone brief me on the laws regarding communications / email for federal employees?
Either that or point towards a web site that can?
Don’t worry. Obama will be issuing a blanket pardon for EVERYONE in his Admin if/when we are able to eject him from the White House. NO ONE will ever be held accountable for all the criminality. It’s the way the Dems, with their sycophant Media, operate.
My objection is that, just as the public and the commentariat seem confused about what the committee is for and what it can do, so does the committee. Chairman Gowdy is determined to run the case like a criminal investigation, but it is not one. It is a public-accountability investigation. It is not legal but political in nature – and I mean “political” not in the pejorative sense of partisanship but in the classic sense of accountability for the misuse and abuse of political power.
Several important things flow from that foundational premise. It is often prudent for a prosecutor to take a very long time to undertake a complex investigation involving transactions that occur largely outside the United States. The case is put together in secret, behind the scenes, because the objective is to construct an airtight case that convinces twelve jurors beyond a reasonable doubt to convict people who will be sent to jail for many years. That takes however long it takes.
That is not the case with a public-accountability investigation. Such oversight investigations need to work quickly to correct wayward policies and hold up to public scrutiny officials who may not be up to their weighty responsibilities. The idea is to demonstrate convincingly that changes need to be made, not to prove beyond a reasonable doubt that people need to go to jai
“For ten months, the committee takes virtually no action and conveys the impression that it is not exactly tripping over itself to get to the bottom of Benghazi.”
A political investigation by Congress will go nowhere as long as members of the GOP are compromised. What secrets about their personal lives do they not wish to see the light of day? Nothing but extortion explains the unwillingness of the GOP to fight.
And note that McCarthy wants us to believe that he has some inside knowledge of what the committee has been doing for 8 months. I really doubt that he does. We'll see when Gowdy puts Hillary under oath in a public hearing. That will be a popular show.
And everyone should note that the Hillary EMail scandal is a direct result of the Trey Gowdy probe into Benghazi. One would think that would be enough for McCarthy. Apparently not.
And, lastly, I would bet $100 to win $10 that McCarthy reads FR. He might even be posting here.
Trey?
FYI
Guaranteed. Nobody would take my bet on that one. I'm betting Megyn Kelly or least here staff as well.
The Obama Regime is a Communist/Muslim Criminal Enterprise.
BINGO!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.