Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Thought Police: Firms must swear ObamaCare not a factor in firings
foxnews.com ^ | 2/11/14 | Chris Stirewalt

Posted on 02/11/2014 8:47:02 AM PST by ColdOne

How will the feds know what employers were thinking when hiring and firing? Simple. Firms will be required to certify to the IRS – under penalty of perjury – that ObamaCare was not a motivating factor in their staffing decisions. To avoid ObamaCare costs you must swear that you are not trying to avoid ObamaCare costs. You can duck the law, but only if you promise not to say so.

(Excerpt) Read more at foxnews.com ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Crime/Corruption; Front Page News; Government
KEYWORDS: abortion; deathpanels; irs; jobs; layoffs; obamacare; unconstitutional; unemployment; zerocare
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101-105 next last
To: ColdOne

Magic wand time. Thank to this law, nobody will have lost their jobs due to Obamacare. The Obama admin can now point to the companies declaring that no employee did. They only have to keep fooling their idiots.


61 posted on 02/11/2014 9:16:10 AM PST by Hillarys Gate Cult (Liberals make unrealistic demands on reality and reality doesn't oblige them.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DCBryan1

The purpose behind this directive is so that Obama and Obamacare won’t look bad.

Just flip this around and you get what is really intended -

companies will be penalized for SAYING that they fired people because of Obamacare.


62 posted on 02/11/2014 9:16:23 AM PST by MrB (The difference between a Humanist and a Satanist - the latter admits whom he's working for)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies]

To: skinkinthegrass

Directive 10-289


63 posted on 02/11/2014 9:18:00 AM PST by mykroar (We fight, get beat, rise, and fight again. - Nathanael Greene)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: TomGuy

*Obama lied about Obamacare, so why can’t businesses?*

I think businesses have a loophole.

Since the government allows illegals to break the law and doesn’t round them up or punish them, it seems like productive business owners who hire legal Americans should be able to pick and choose what laws they want to obey and use the Federal government as a president for ignoring laws that they don’t like.


64 posted on 02/11/2014 9:18:31 AM PST by PATRIOT1876
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: mykroar
got it, thanks.

65 posted on 02/11/2014 9:22:08 AM PST by skinkinthegrass (The end move in politics is always to pick up a gun..0'Caligula / 0'Reid / 0'Pelosi)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies]

To: Menehune56

A generation ago, this was not possible for the simple reason that the government was not big enough and pervasive enough to pull it off. Now the government is so large, intrusive and unaccountable that it recognizes no limits on its power over the citizens.


66 posted on 02/11/2014 9:23:38 AM PST by henkster (Communists never negotiate.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: ColdOne

The fascist irs carrying out the wishes of the czar.


67 posted on 02/11/2014 9:23:57 AM PST by I want the USA back (Media: completely irresponsible traitors. Complicit in the destruction of our country.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MrB

Yeah, I guess our legal guy can say, “We fired 8 employees because they are too stupid to work here. I mean, they voted for Obama. Obamacare thresholds had nothing to do with it!.....I swear and affirm!”


68 posted on 02/11/2014 9:25:17 AM PST by DCBryan1 (No realli, moose bytes can be quite nasti!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies]

To: ColdOne

The central committee has ruled.


69 posted on 02/11/2014 9:26:01 AM PST by Vaduz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ColdOne

I would do it in twenty or so paragraphs, each swearing up and down that ObamaCare has absolutely nothing to do with the hire or firing decisions, the costs associated with ObamaCare are not factored in to any business decision we here at Divadroid International (hereinafter referred to as “the company” make. ObamaCare expenses have no relation to any decision the company affecting its personnel, relocation to off-shore facilities of any the company’s manufacturing, service or administrative functions. The company makes every effort to offer ObamaCare compliant insurance to all US based employees without regards to direct costs or imposed administrative overhead cost as mandated by law...


70 posted on 02/11/2014 9:26:48 AM PST by null and void (<--- unwilling cattle-car passenger on the bullet train to serfdom)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ColdOne

Bump


71 posted on 02/11/2014 9:33:09 AM PST by lowbridge
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DCBryan1

That IS a pretty good IQ indicator.


72 posted on 02/11/2014 9:33:31 AM PST by MrB (The difference between a Humanist and a Satanist - the latter admits whom he's working for)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 68 | View Replies]

To: GOPJ
Boot to the face and grind...

“If you want a vision of the future, imagine a boot stamping on a human face forever.” - 1984, George Orwell

73 posted on 02/11/2014 9:40:04 AM PST by Paine in the Neck (Our Lives, our Fortunes, and our sacred Honor)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: null and void

I can shorten if for them:

“Bush’s fault!”


74 posted on 02/11/2014 9:40:06 AM PST by TurboZamboni (Marx smelled bad and lived with his parents .)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 70 | View Replies]

To: null and void

That’s a bit related to the term “apophasis”.

In this case, by vehemently denying it, you’re confirming it.

I would add, as well, that “the following” must be stated due to Obama’s requirement that businesses may not state that any hiring or firing decisions were due to obamacare.


75 posted on 02/11/2014 9:43:22 AM PST by MrB (The difference between a Humanist and a Satanist - the latter admits whom he's working for)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 70 | View Replies]

To: ColdOne

I do not remember this being in the bill. Can anyone tell me where the wording is located that gives the IRS the ability to enforce law that is not passed by congress?


76 posted on 02/11/2014 9:57:13 AM PST by Cyman (We have to pass it to see what's in it= definition of stool sample)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ColdOne

The classic command economy defect Hayak predicted. Engage in a policy that logically produces a negative outcome, then ban negative outcomes. Just a little extra step here, also mandating that your “subjects” pretend the negative outcome isn’t actually being caused by your policy.

Let’s announce free food for all, then shoot anyone who complains about not getting any. It doesn’t actually fill anyone’s stomach, but the survivors all pretend they’re no longer hungry... and that’s what’s important.


77 posted on 02/11/2014 10:01:08 AM PST by ArmstedFragg (Hoaxey Dopey Changey)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ArmstedFragg

“Let’s announce free food for all, then shoot anyone who complains about not getting any.”

Except for the part about the multitudes starving to death, that’s pretty much what old Joe Stalin did. ;-)


78 posted on 02/11/2014 10:08:35 AM PST by rhoda_penmark
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 77 | View Replies]

To: skinkinthegrass

Don’t forget Catch 22!


79 posted on 02/11/2014 10:14:58 AM PST by cartoonistx
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: cartoonistx
catch 22
Oh! i forgot that one, slighly different circumstance.

80 posted on 02/11/2014 10:20:57 AM PST by skinkinthegrass (The end move in politics is always to pick up a gun..0'Caligula / 0'Reid / 0'Pelosi)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 79 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101-105 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson