Skip to comments.Kerry: Chemical Weapons 'Undeniable'
Posted on 08/26/2013 12:38:01 PM PDT by Hotlanta Mike
Secretary of State John Kerry says the use of chemical weapons in Syria is "undeniable" and that the U.S. is considering how to respond:
(Excerpt) Read more at weeklystandard.com ...
This is, of course, precisely what this very same cast of clowns has been screaming at Bush for all these years. Apparently it’s not a “reckless rush to war” when they’re doing it.
WMDs??? We are going to war over WMDs? Well MSM, where are you demandining irrefutable proof after the claim Bush lied over WMDs?
Just as undeniable as “climate change”?
Guess you don't remember Powell at the UN.
This is all a snow job that the President has no choice when in fact they do. It don't make any difference which party is president. War is their only option or the world will call them chicken. There are no more Reagans who had the balls to pull out from Lebanon.
FU RD [Republican and Democrat] I'm going Third.
As much as I detest the man Kerry did wear the uniform and he did serve in Vietnam, so I do not think ‘chicken hawk’ is applicable (at least not from my understanding of the word)
They want a pretext so bad ....
Frikkin' .. DUHHHH !
CYA and FUJK
“Kerry: Chemical Weapons ‘Undeniable’”
Yes, john. We know. Some of them showed up on your face.
Wow, can i break out the “Where are the WMDs?” bumper stickers I scraped off my car when I bought it from a hippie?
“By any standard, it is inexcusable. And despite the excuses and equivocations that some have manufactured, it is undeniable.”
Oh. So we should get involved in inexcusably inhuman violations of human rights?
How about people who flog women and stone them? How about people who bury people alive, and rape women? How about people who crucify Christians? How about people who still traffic in slaves? How about people who stone other people to death? How about people who murder Coptic clergymen, harrass Coptic nuns and burn down Coptic Churches????
Get my point?
We see highly selective morality being demonstrated here - by a parcle of lying hypocritical Marxists.
If the State Dept and the Pentagon are not smart enough,
how about we ask Bozo the Clown or a Girl Scout.
Their answers: STOP ARMING al QAEDA!
The likeness is not coincidental. The sneer comes with the attitude and though process.
As everybody here knows, depictions of atrocities can be faked.
I still say there’s something wrong with a scene with multiple un-embalmed bodies laid out in the summer heat of Syria with no evidence of the changes that occur after death.
Somebody will need to come up with some serious proof of a security risk to the United States before I’d back sending young Americans.
March 27, 2011
On CBS’s Face the Nation, U.S. Secretary of State Hillary Clinton was asked whether the Arab Spring would affect Syria. Assad’s father, Bob Schieffer pointed out, had killed 25,000 during an uprising. “There’s a different leader in Syria now,” responded Clinton. “Many of the members of Congress of both parties who have gone to Syria in recent months have said they believe he’s a reformer.”
Blast from the past:
‘Iraq is a long way from Ohio, but what happens there matters a great
deal here. For the risks that the leaders of a rogue state will use
nuclear, chemical or biological weapons against us or our allies is
the greatest security threat we face. And it is a threat against which
we must, and will, stand firm.
In discussing Iraq, we begin by knowing that Saddam Hussein, unlike
any other leader, has used weapons of mass destruction even against
his own people. In fact, he is a repeat offender, having used them
both in the battle and against his people.’
(but the talking points became Bush was the war monger.)
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.