Skip to comments.
Report: Holder Tells Media He Will Protect First Amendment
Breitbart ^
| May 31, 2013
| By Elizabeth Sheld
Posted on 05/31/2013 12:25:19 PM PDT by Jim Robinson
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-63 next last
To: Jim Robinson
Holder will soon break that promise. Here in CA the State Senate passed eight (8) new anti-gun laws, including one that requires ammo registry and an ammo permit to buy ammunition. Once the 2nd Amendment is no longer protected, the 1st Amendment will follow.
41
posted on
05/31/2013 1:08:50 PM PDT
by
SoldierDad
(Proud dad of an Army Soldier who has survived 24 months of Combat deployment.)
To: FReepers; Patriots; FRiends
IT'S TIME....MUSICMAN HAS MADE HIS CALL!
527 posted on
05/31/2013 11:55:08 AM PDT by
musicman (Until I see the REAL Long Form Vault BC, he's just "PRES__ENT" Obama = Without "ID")
42
posted on
05/31/2013 1:12:32 PM PDT
by
onyx
(Please Support Free Republic - Donate Monthly! If you want on Sarah Palin's Ping List, Let Me know!)
To: Jim Robinson
I would trust the fox watching the hen house, before I would trust Mr. AP & FoxNews Wiretapper.
43
posted on
05/31/2013 1:18:28 PM PDT
by
TomGuy
(.)
To: Jim Robinson
“Yesterday, Attorney General Eric Holder pledged to protect the first amendment rights of the media at a closed door, off-the-record meeting. “
1. It wasn’t the “media”. It was only a few of them.
2. Why is this news (an AG saying he would follow the Bill of Rights)?
3. Why does an AG even feel compelled to state the obvious - that an AG must follow the Bill of Rights?
4. Does this mean he will follow the 1st Amendment from now on and acknowledges that he didn’t follow it before?
5. why is this being provided via off-the-record session? is the message here that he can’t say something this “extreme” in an on-the-record session?
Impeach this evil SOB
To: plain talk
Amen. Hope he hates breaking rocks.
45
posted on
05/31/2013 1:32:46 PM PDT
by
Jim Robinson
(Resistance to tyrants is obedience to God!!)
To: plain talk
All good points the MSM wouldn’t touch.
46
posted on
05/31/2013 1:34:32 PM PDT
by
Rennes Templar
(The true Obama persona is emerging, the one from his first Presidential debate.)
To: Jim Robinson
Lie-beral Argument: The founders didn’t know about Twitter, Facebook, Websites, Radio and Television.....
Because they think they can ban an AR-15 because the founders never knew of them, just you wait, the morons in the Main Stream Media press will cut their own throat by claiming the same stuipid logic applies to their own trade.....
47
posted on
05/31/2013 1:36:59 PM PDT
by
GraceG
To: Hardraade
But talking down to muslims is criminal.
What amendment was that again???
Well if the Liberals will let us have “Musketts” Can we use a old timey press to print out anti Mooselimb pamphlets and there would be nothing they could do about it.....
48
posted on
05/31/2013 1:39:05 PM PDT
by
GraceG
To: Jim Robinson
Just the press part, the rest of the Constitution can go to hell.
49
posted on
05/31/2013 1:40:34 PM PDT
by
depressed in 06
(America conceived in liberty, dies in slavery.)
To: Jim Robinson
50
posted on
05/31/2013 1:49:19 PM PDT
by
Cyber Liberty
(I am a dissident. Will you join me? My name is John....)
To: Jim Robinson
Holder has always been a vigorous defender of his right to free speech. I’m not certain why the Little People feel it applies to us too.
To: jazusamo; blueyon; LucyT; pax_et_bonum; autumnraine; maggief; Silentgypsy; thouworm; ...
How do we know that's even what he said since the meeting was a 'closed door, off the record' affair? How do we know what disclaimers and caveats were running around in his head behind his beady eyes? It's like not one thin dime but hundreds, if not thousands. Bastich.
Anyone wanting on or off this ping list, please advise. Thanks.
52
posted on
05/31/2013 2:03:49 PM PDT
by
MestaMachine
(My caps work. You gotta earn them.)
To: Jim Robinson
Of course he will. Unfortunately he thinks the 1st ammendment only protects speech he agrees with.
53
posted on
05/31/2013 2:10:00 PM PDT
by
Brooklyn Attitude
(Obama being re-elected is the political equivalent of OJ being found not guilty.)
To: Jim Robinson
If you have to assure the media you’re going to do your job...
To: tennmountainman
Lets see. He has an off the record meeting with media sycophants to tell them he believes in Freedom of speech? Yes, and he gave the journalists permission to say he believes in a free press. That's how they were able to report that part - he gave them 'permission'...
55
posted on
05/31/2013 2:34:01 PM PDT
by
GOPJ
(Swedes bring their cars..savages their flames..burning cars a metaphor. D. Greenfield)
To: GOPJ
Nice of Holder to give the media sycophants “permission” to report that
he believes in Free Speech.
Comment #57 Removed by Moderator
To: Jim Robinson
Uyghur, PLEASE!
58
posted on
05/31/2013 3:51:25 PM PDT
by
Feckless
(I was trained by the US << This Tagline Censored by FR >> ain't that irOnic?)
The vile, contemptible, nothing is lower Dick Durbin says the rest of us non media slobs don’t have First Amendment Rights. Will Holder denounce him?
59
posted on
05/31/2013 4:30:44 PM PDT
by
Godwin1
(House press offices. All they need is a couple of editors to rewrite)
To: Jim Robinson
Holder will protect the First Amendment rights of the media, but he won't do that for any other non-minority American. I'm sure that is what he is really saying here. This admin is all nudges and winks.
60
posted on
05/31/2013 9:07:17 PM PDT
by
Major Matt Mason
("Journalism is dead. All news is suspect." - Noamie)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-63 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson
