Kermit Gosnell Receives Third Consecutive Life Term for Killing Baby

Life News ^ | Steven Ertelt

[Morgana]

Just happened!!!

[laweeks]

Baby A, Baby B, Baby C, Baby D . . . murdered ruthlessly before they even had a name . . . and I still wonder why the women who paid this filthy bastard to slaughter their children were not similarly charged as complicit in these murders.

Why were they not charged?

This bloody animal could not have brutally murdered these babies without "mommies'" permission. Seems as though they'd drag those worthless females into court too.

Everything's upside down in this horribly bloody drama!

[gasport]

Pith on him.

[immadashell]

first-degree murder in the deaths of three babies born alive

This is the famous Barack Hussein Obama Solution. Does anyone want to ask Jay Carney, "What would the President do?"

[Morgana]

“Why were they not charged? “

Roe vs Wade is why.

Gosnell would not have been charged either had he killed them still en utero.

Until we overturn Roe vs Wade we can’t do anything to the mothers or abortion doctors who kill en utero.

We can however go after doctors who kill babies out side the uterus. That thanks to the Infants born alive law.

[laweeks]

Until we overturn Roe vs Wade we can’t do anything to the mothers or abortion doctors who kill en utero. We can however go after doctors who kill babies out side the uterus. That thanks to the Infants born alive law.

Incredible stretch of the meaning of words to allow the women to jump ship and have no responsibility in the slaughter of their children. It's all words . . . semantics . . . that keep the 3,300 children's slaughter each day going. How absolutely awful.

[C210N]

"What would the President do?"

Øbama: "If I had a fetus, he/she would look just like Fetus "A" (or "B", or "C", ...)"

[Morgana]

“Øbama: “If I had a fetus, he/she would look just like Fetus “A” (or “B”, or “C”, ...)” “

that would be his grandbabies. but good one!!

[Gaffer]

I hope he gets his crap chute expanded to the point where a fart from yesteryear that sounded like a small ‘tweet’ becomes a sound that likens to that of a hippopotamus exhaling from ‘neath the water.

[Salvation]

Not nearly so bad as what God will mete out for Gosnell at the moment of Gosnell’s death.

Think “Lake of Fire.”

[Morgana]

“The product, abortion, is skillfully marketed and sold to the woman at the crisis time in her life. She buys the product, finds it defective and wants to return it for a refund. But, it’s too late.”

Carol Everett

[Salvation]

[bert]

Given that he lives in a liberal state he would never be executed any way.

Given that he is from lawless Philadelphia, he will likely be pardoned in a few years.

[Elsie]

It got about 3 column inches in today’s Indianapolis Star.

On page A-6

[Elsie]

I'd like to thank the United States Government for protecting me and my kind.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

You see, 40 years ago, my odds of making it out of the egg, alive, were very poor; about 80% of us died. 

 (http://www.scientificamerican.com/article.cfm?id=rachel-carson-silent-spring-1972-ddt-ban-birds-thrive)

 

 

But a lady discovered our plight and wrote a book that addressed our problem,

and, in 1972, a law was ammended protecting us even further. (http://www.fws.gov/midwest/eagle/protect/laws.html)

 

 

 

 

 

 

What I find strange is that the same government passed a law the very next year that allowed for killing

of unborn, and apparently unwanted, humans.  Little ones still nestled safely in their Mother's womb.

Around 25% of them are dying before birth - on average nearly 3,300 - every day of the year.

 

 

I hear that by now, somewhere around 55 MILLION of them have perished.

Wouldn't that kind of mess up the humans plans for growth, and welfare, and

retirement?

 

 

 

 

 

Strange birds; these Homo Sapiens.  Perhaps they'll come to their senses

before they are ALL dead!

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

I'd like to thank the United States Government for protecting me and my kind.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

You see, 40 years ago, my odds of making it out of the egg, alive, were very poor; about 80% of us died. 

 (http://www.scientificamerican.com/article.cfm?id=rachel-carson-silent-spring-1972-ddt-ban-birds-thrive)

 

 

But a lady discovered our plight and wrote a book that addressed our problem,

and, in 1972, a law was ammended protecting us even further. (http://www.fws.gov/midwest/eagle/protect/laws.html)

 

 

 

 

 

 

What I find strange is that the same government passed a law the very next year that allowed for killing

of unborn, and apparently unwanted, humans.  Little ones still nestled safely in their Mother's womb.

Around 25% of them are dying before birth - on average nearly 3,300 - every day of the year.

 

 

I hear that by now, somewhere around 55 MILLION of them have perished.

Wouldn't that kind of mess up the humans plans for growth, and welfare, and

retirement?

 

 

 

 

 

Strange birds; these Homo Sapiens.  Perhaps they'll come to their senses

before they are ALL dead!

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

[Slings and Arrows]

The prosecutors...also agreed to the life sentences in prison because Gosnell’s age made it unlikely he would be executed before his appeals ran out, as he would die naturally beforehand.

I figured that was the situation, and I understand their reasoning. Still tastes bitter, though.

[Elsie]

This ain’t news!

Angela Jolie’s BOOBs are NEWS!~!!!!

[definitelynotaliberal]

In this case, the exhortation seems fitting, so I’ll say it:

Go to hell, Kermit Gosnell!

[SgtHooper]

What a travesty. He should be delivered to death.

[I want the USA back]

Feminazis are not happy. They will get revenge. Never underestimate the wrath of a scorned man-hating fang-toothed raging feminazi.