Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

They are retarded and married but can't find a group home that will allow them to live together. There has to be a solution to this.
1 posted on 05/08/2013 3:14:59 AM PDT by grundle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: grundle

I don’t want to rain on their bliss, but how can two retarded adults enter into a binding contract?

Could these folks buy property? Could they enter into an auto loan contract?

Just curious.


2 posted on 05/08/2013 3:27:46 AM PDT by Vermont Lt (Does anybody really know what time it is? Does anybody really care?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: grundle

My question is, who will take care of their children?


3 posted on 05/08/2013 3:33:29 AM PDT by Old_Grouch (65 and AARP-free. Monthly FR contributor.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: grundle
There is a wide variance in the levels of retardation. They should be allowed all considerations of any married couple needing long term care assistance. I've heard people argue it pro and con. A family in my neighborhood had a man disabled by Polio and his wife was retarded. Their daughter was fine last I heard she was a college grad and had married and taken in her parents.

My guess is the couple in this article ended up in group homes likely due to advanced age of their parents or their parents planning ahead. This case would have wide implications for all with disabilities and their right to marry. Marriages with disabilities of spouses involved can and do work. The added cost to the state for this couple would be nil.

4 posted on 05/08/2013 3:36:38 AM PDT by cva66snipe (Two Choices left for U.S. One Nation Under GOD or One Nation Under Judgment? Which one say ye?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: grundle

If they were homosexual the group homes would be falling over themselves to set them up and the zero would call telling them how brave they are to be “so retatded and yet...”[snark]

It does bring up the point: who actually married them and should they have done so? They are obviously incapable of living on their own, so how is this contract valid?
Fact is that they are married. They should not be denied what they can enjoy of each other. It should not take too many $$ resources to accomodate them.


5 posted on 05/08/2013 3:47:25 AM PDT by Adder (No, Mr. Franklin, we could NOT keep it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: grundle

As a taxpayer (so presumably supporting these people), my position is that I should not have to fork out more money to fund anything beyond the basics. In particular, they should not be having children that I then have to pay for. (This goes double for welfare recipients.)

That said, it seems that there should be some measure of basic human compassion that would allow them to live together. I would think that with all the social services workers we have, the could come up with some solution to this.


14 posted on 05/08/2013 4:35:12 AM PDT by generally (Don't be stupid. We have politicians for that.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: grundle

If they can get past this little obstacle, I suspect they both will live happily ever after together........good for them!


15 posted on 05/08/2013 4:36:08 AM PDT by Hot Tabasco (This space for rent)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: grundle

Bump


19 posted on 05/08/2013 5:10:15 AM PDT by lowbridge
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: grundle

Weird.

They cannot function on their own in society yet, they were allowed to enter into a contract and “consensual” relationship?

Either they require care or they do not.


23 posted on 05/08/2013 5:25:05 AM PDT by Vendome (Don't take life so seriously, you won't live through it anyway)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: grundle

Would it be possible for the parents of the couple to get them an apartment or something?


29 posted on 05/08/2013 6:42:50 AM PDT by pnz1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: grundle
Oh pooh! This shouldn't be a problem, one room instead of two. As far as sex etc., is everyone pretending like handicapped adults (or kids) don't have it? If so please take lessons and join the real world. Whether they are private pay or public assistance should make no difference. This should be a minor problem, why in the world it is being made into such a crisis is what we should really be questioning. Sounds like a typical bureaucratic SNAFU. Kudos to two people who had the decency to marry instead of just “hooking up”!
31 posted on 05/08/2013 7:07:24 AM PDT by pepperdog ( I still get a thrill up my leg when spell check doesn't recognize the name/word Obama!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: grundle

I agree. Surely, there is a group home somewhere that will take this couple.

Disabled adults can lead very lonely lives, so the quality of their lives could greatly improve if they have one another.

May God bless them.


33 posted on 05/08/2013 7:31:14 AM PDT by GSD Lover
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: grundle
I have a retarded aunt.

She is now 86. She was forceps damaged in a hard delivery at a New Mexico road camp in the 20s

Slightly retarded..like touched.

She had boyfriends but nothing beyond playfulness

they were all Downs boys and died pretty young...

these girls are very vulnerable sexually...to say the least

we help take care of her, she's been a joy and keeps on ticking..she is one of only 3-4 older relatives I know have

i’m ambivalent on this

39 posted on 05/08/2013 9:14:34 AM PDT by wardaddy (wanna know how my kin felt during Reconstruction in Mississippi, you fixin to find out firsthand)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: grundle

There is. Their parents can have them move in with them.


48 posted on 05/08/2013 12:57:29 PM PDT by Lurker (Violence is rarely the answer. But when it is it is the only answer.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: grundle; MeekOneGOP; Conspiracy Guy; DocRock; King Prout; Darksheare; OSHA; martin_fierro; ...
Hard cases make bad law.


53 posted on 05/09/2013 10:30:29 AM PDT by Slings and Arrows (You can't have IngSoc without an Emmanuel Goldstein.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: grundle
The lawsuit contends Forziano's facility refused because people requiring the services of a group home are by definition incapable of living as married people, and it says Samuels' home refused because it believes she doesn't have the mental capacity to consent to sex.

And this from the same liberal, government types who are encouraging young teens to do it?

This frosts me. If they want to get married and their parents don't have a problem with it, it's not anybody's business. Who else are they going to deem unfit to marry and what is the cut off for mental disabilities and the consent to have sex?

54 posted on 05/09/2013 12:53:41 PM PDT by metmom (For freedom Christ has set us free; stand firm therefore & do not submit again to a yoke of slavery)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: grundle; Revolting cat!

There is a solution, he can be get a sex change operation. Somehow I doubt that they are prohibiting same sex roommates from having sex at night.


55 posted on 05/09/2013 1:37:56 PM PDT by a fool in paradise (America 2013 - STUCK ON STUPID)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: grundle

So many of the posts on this thread have to do with the question: “what shall the State do about this?”

Hello?

FRiends, this is a matter best handled by friends, family, and neighborhoods.

F(orget) the State.


56 posted on 05/09/2013 11:19:05 PM PDT by golux
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson