Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Mark Sanford wins primary; faces Steve Colbert's sister
American Thinker ^ | 04/03/2013 | Rick Moran

Posted on 04/03/2013 6:53:54 AM PDT by SeekAndFind

Disgraced former Governor Mark Sanford easily won the runoff election for the Republican nomination in South Carolina's First Congressional District. He will face Democrat Elizabeth Colbert Busch, sister of comedian Steve Colbert, in the special election next month.

From The Hill:

The former governor's runoff win seemed likely as of two weeks ago, when he finished more than 20 percentage points ahead of Bostic in the first round of voting. Bostic got off to a slow start in the two-week primary runoff, hampered by a lack of funds, and while he secured some high-profile endorsements, including from former Sen. Rick Santorum (R-Pa.), he didn't have the time or money to give Sanford a serious challenge.

The district is heavily Republican -- Mitt Romney won it with 58 percent of the vote -- but Colbert Busch has run a strong campaign so far, focused on her business career. National Republicans admit that Sanford's baggage and the unpredictability of special elections mean this race could go either way.

Recent polls reflect that reality: An internal poll from Colbert Busch's campaign and one from the Democratic-affiliated Public Policy Polling found her with a narrow lead over Sanford. While many more Republicans were undecided in both polls and are more likely to vote for Sanford, he'll have to work hard to win the May 7 general election.

Colbert Busch's campaign was quick to slam Sanford following his primary win.

"The families of this district need a representative who they can trust," Colbert Busch campaign spokesman James Smith said. "Mark Sanford simply has the wrong values for our community -- whether that's his terms as Governor or the last time he was in Congress, where he opposed commonsense measures like the Violence Against Women Act, which provides shelters and resources for domestic violence survivors.

(Excerpt) Read more at americanthinker.com ...


TOPICS: Breaking News; Culture/Society; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; US: South Carolina
KEYWORDS: colbert; colbertbusch; congress; elizabethbusch; marksanford; sanford; sc2013; southcarolina; stephencolbert
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-72 next last

1 posted on 04/03/2013 6:53:54 AM PDT by SeekAndFind
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Apparently Sanford couldn’t find a job.


2 posted on 04/03/2013 6:58:21 AM PDT by DManA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

He’ll probably lose and then we can take back the seat next November. And we’ll be rid of this flawed candidate for good. These politicians care more about themselves and their own careers than the cause or the country.


3 posted on 04/03/2013 7:01:06 AM PDT by cotton1706
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind; Impy
RE :”Colbert Busch's campaign was quick to slam Sanford following his primary win.
“The families of this district need a representative who they can trust,” Colbert Busch campaign spokesman James Smith said. “Mark Sanford simply has the wrong values for our community — whether that's his terms as Governor or the last time he was in Congress, where he opposed commonsense measures like the Violence Against Women Act, which provides shelters and resources for domestic violence survivors. On issue after issue, Mark Sanford doesn't reflect the values of South Carolina.”

I can see the Dems will work hard to make him look good to us.

Lets see how it goes

4 posted on 04/03/2013 7:11:44 AM PDT by sickoflibs (To GOP : Any path to US citizenship IS putting them ahead in line. Stop lying about your position.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: upchuck; cotton1706

What happens if he wins?

He and his supporters will feel redeemed and we’ll be stuck with him for the foreseeable future, along with Lindsey Graham.


5 posted on 04/03/2013 7:13:02 AM PDT by Mr Fuji
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Mr Fuji

If he wins, he’ll be talked into supporting liberal legislation, like John Ensign was. Democrats and moderate republicans will praise and cajole him...until a democrat defeats him because he is a weak link, or the republicans in the district wise up and primary him out of office.


6 posted on 04/03/2013 7:19:08 AM PDT by cotton1706
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind
And again Republican’s shoot themselves in the foot by running the one candidate that can, and probably will, lose what should have been a slam dunk race. At least the late night comediennes will get some mileage out of Sanford...
7 posted on 04/03/2013 7:19:38 AM PDT by apillar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: apillar

“And again Republican’s shoot themselves in the foot by running the one candidate that can, and probably will, lose what should have been a slam dunk race. At least the late night comediennes will get some mileage out of Sanford...”

But look on the bright side....Karl Rove will be his campaign manager in the 2016 race against Hillary...and there are plenty of folks on here that would vote for the putz


8 posted on 04/03/2013 7:27:52 AM PDT by BubbaJunebug
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

9 posted on 04/03/2013 7:46:18 AM PDT by IbJensen (Liberals are like Slinkies, good for nothing, but you smile as you push them down the stairs.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Come on, Mark Sanford? Aren’t republicans supposed to be smarter than that? Ridiculous.


10 posted on 04/03/2013 7:53:37 AM PDT by opus86
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: opus86

11 posted on 04/03/2013 7:54:11 AM PDT by SeekAndFind
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: opus86
Aren’t republicans supposed to be smarter than that?

Didn't the last two Presidential elections teach you anything?

12 posted on 04/03/2013 7:54:17 AM PDT by dfwgator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: DManA

If he only had the affair, I would say good for him. However, when you go AWOL for days without any notice or even a successor than you should be a cooked goose. I hope he loses because he will be the laughing stock for Republicans and we can get the seat back in November with a Real Conservative Republican especially for South Carolina.


13 posted on 04/03/2013 7:54:53 AM PDT by napscoordinator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

So the GOP throws another race.


14 posted on 04/03/2013 8:16:58 AM PDT by redgolum ("God is dead" -- Nietzsche. "Nietzsche is dead" -- God.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mr Fuji
He and his supporters will feel redeemed and we’ll be stuck with him for the foreseeable future, along with Lindsey Graham.

And we'll stuck with that new "Evita" of a wife.

15 posted on 04/03/2013 8:18:01 AM PDT by dfwgator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: napscoordinator
If he only had the affair, I would say good for him. However, when you go AWOL for days without any notice or even a successor than you should be a cooked goose. I hope he loses because he will be the laughing stock for Republicans and we can get the seat back in November with a Real Conservative Republican especially for South Carolina.

I couldn't agree more.

I am spectacularly uninterested in the marital fidelity of politicians. But a sitting governor who voluntarily disappears for days on end has abdicated his office and betrayed the public trust.

He has no business going anywhere near elected office, and I hope he's rejected in a landslide.

That the GOP has already given him a pass for inexcusable behavior is bad enough, but I hope the voters have slightly higher standards.
16 posted on 04/03/2013 8:27:00 AM PDT by highball ("I never should have switched from scotch to martinis." -- the last words of Humphrey Bogart)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: cotton1706

>>If he wins, he’ll be talked into supporting liberal legislation

I highly doubt that. Sanford was consistently a fiscal conservative during his 3 terms in congress and the governorship and held a 92% ACU rating. Any mistrust of him is with his personal not his professional conduct. And if he really wants to salvage his reputation he’s going to have to be on especially good behavior.

I just don’t see reason for histrionics over his nomination.


17 posted on 04/03/2013 8:28:29 AM PDT by vikingd00d (chown -R us ./base)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: IbJensen
This is Jenny Sanford:


This is Mark Sanford's Argentinian Lover

18 posted on 04/03/2013 8:29:58 AM PDT by SeekAndFind
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: vikingd00d

Somehow South Carolina survived his absence—no South Carolinian diplomats were killed, Uruguay didn’t invade, and no asteroids fell on the state.


19 posted on 04/03/2013 8:37:31 AM PDT by Verginius Rufus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

“Hell hath no fury like a woman scorned.”

IMO, Jenny Sanford is waiting for the right moment to nuke her straying ex to the moon & back. Like his fling with the Argie is the ONLY naughty thing he’s ever done?

As a South Carolinian I am embarassed at this sordid sideshow. Electing principled conservatives in our state should be simple & easy, with or without the 6th District (James Clyburn). But it isn’t, sadly.


20 posted on 04/03/2013 8:42:07 AM PDT by elcid1970 ("The Second Amendment is more important than Islam.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: opus86

The problem with politics is it’s rife with politicians.


21 posted on 04/03/2013 8:42:18 AM PDT by Rennes Templar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: vikingd00d

Well we’ll see.


22 posted on 04/03/2013 8:43:10 AM PDT by cotton1706
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind
I empathize with conservatives in that district.

In 1986, conservatives in California were saddled with a horrible choice for US Senate as Democrat Alan Cranston, an old hard-core lefty who was running for re-election, faced off against Rep. Ed Zschau (rhymes--appropriately--with Mao), a Vito Marcantonio Republican.

Some conservatives voted for Zschau because Cranston was so bad, and they wanted the GOP to keep control of the Senate, some voted for Cranston because they knew he would only serve one more term, and they feared that Zschau, being young, would be there forever. I wound up going third party.

23 posted on 04/03/2013 8:46:24 AM PDT by Fiji Hill (Io Triumphe!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Sanford will win this fairly easily. There is also a “Green Party” candidate on the ballot to siphon off some of the liberal vote.


24 posted on 04/03/2013 8:52:19 AM PDT by Old Retired Army Guy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: apillar
And again Republican’s shoot themselves in the foot by running the one candidate that can, and probably will, lose what should have been a slam dunk race.

See my post #23. The 1986 US Senate race in California should have resulted in a Republican pickup. Incumbent Alan Cranston was vulnerable, and there were about 12 candidates vying for the nomination. Of these, 11 were conservative and one--Ed Zschau--was a leftie.

The conservatives campaigned hard against one another, but eventually one, Bruce Herschensohn, emerged as the frontrunner. Lesser candidates began to drop out and support Bruce, but Mike Antonovich continued to run negative ads against Bruce late in the campaign.

Zschau won by taking only a third of all the votes cast, and since there was no runoff, he got the nomination--and went on to lose the race.

25 posted on 04/03/2013 8:57:46 AM PDT by Fiji Hill (Io Triumphe!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Supporting perverted Republicans makes it very hard to defend conservative values. Gay marriage, serial marriage, abortion and adultery are all part of the same sickness. Conservatives need to oppose ALL of it.


26 posted on 04/03/2013 8:58:22 AM PDT by Hilda
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

"Hey boss! Sanford won the primary in SC!"

"Ah, Republicans! The gift that keeps on giving!"


27 posted on 04/03/2013 8:58:48 AM PDT by COBOL2Java (Fighting Obama without Boehner & McConnell is like going deer hunting without your accordion)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

GOP the stupid party.


28 posted on 04/03/2013 9:00:30 AM PDT by bmwcyle (People who do not study history are destine to believe really ignorant statements.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

How much did he get on the trade-in?


29 posted on 04/03/2013 9:01:40 AM PDT by nascarnation (Baraq's economic policy: trickle up poverty)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: vikingd00d

I agree with you.


30 posted on 04/03/2013 9:02:20 AM PDT by beandog (All Aboard the Choo Choo Train to Crazy Town)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: vikingd00d
I highly doubt that. Sanford was consistently a fiscal conservative

Because nothing speaks "Fiscal Conservatism", like jetting down to Buenos Aires on the taxpayers' dime.

31 posted on 04/03/2013 9:03:19 AM PDT by dfwgator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: IbJensen

I’ve looked at some of her “non-pr” photos.
On a scale of 58 yr old female Democrats, she’s a 9.5


32 posted on 04/03/2013 9:04:36 AM PDT by nascarnation (Baraq's economic policy: trickle up poverty)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Sanford should have evolved into a homo instead of chasing Pan American skirt. The GOP would have held the door open for him and rolled out the rainbow carpet.


33 posted on 04/03/2013 9:04:54 AM PDT by TADSLOS (The Event Horizon has come and gone. Buckle up and hang on.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Verginius Rufus
Somehow South Carolina survived his absence—no South Carolinian diplomats were killed, Uruguay didn’t invade, and no asteroids fell on the state.

Oh well ok then, that makes it perfectly okiley-dokiley.

34 posted on 04/03/2013 9:05:03 AM PDT by dfwgator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: dfwgator

>>Because nothing speaks “Fiscal Conservatism”, like jetting down to Buenos Aires on the taxpayers’ dime.

He payed his own travel expenses for the Argentina trip.


35 posted on 04/03/2013 9:41:22 AM PDT by vikingd00d (chown -R us ./base)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: vikingd00d

WRONG...

“Before leaving office as governor, Mark Sanford avoided impeachment but was censured by the Legislature over state travel expenses he used for the affair. He also had to pay more than $70,000 in ethics fines — still the largest in state history — after Associated Press investigations raised questions about his use of state, private and commercial aircraft.”


36 posted on 04/03/2013 9:43:36 AM PDT by dfwgator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: cotton1706

They actually have a lot in common. She’s the sister of a Commedian, and he’s a Joke.


37 posted on 04/03/2013 9:54:53 AM PDT by NavVet ("You Lie!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Yet again, the GOP-E force a weak candidate on us.


38 posted on 04/03/2013 9:57:37 AM PDT by Aglooka ("I was out numbered 5-to-1, I got 4.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

He does not need to be placed back into an office of the People’s trust.


39 posted on 04/03/2013 10:01:51 AM PDT by newzjunkey (bah)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Fiji Hill

And Bruce Herschensohn was nominated for the U.S. Senate in 1992 giving us Barbara Boxer.


40 posted on 04/03/2013 10:06:42 AM PDT by newzjunkey (bah)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: Rennes Templar
"You don't say?"
41 posted on 04/03/2013 10:16:18 AM PDT by John 3_19-21 ("as for me and my house, we will serve the Lord.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind
This is a most unfortunate situation.

I cannot bring myself to be for this man's Democratic opponent.

But I also cannot support him.

Another poster was probably correct: The best possible outcome--or, more precisely, the least bad outcome--would be for another Republican to win the seat in 2014...

42 posted on 04/03/2013 10:23:47 AM PDT by AmericanExceptionalist (Democrats believe in discussing the full spectrum of ideas, all the way from far left to center-left)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Another “burn the house down if the windows don’t fit” thread.


43 posted on 04/03/2013 10:25:07 AM PDT by The_Media_never_lie (Actually, they lie when it suits them! The crooked MS media must be defeated any way it can be done!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: John 3_19-21

Prima nocte


44 posted on 04/03/2013 10:31:11 AM PDT by Rennes Templar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: newzjunkey
And Bruce Herschensohn was nominated for the U.S. Senate in 1992 giving us Barbara Boxer.

I assume you would have preferred Tom Campbell, Herschensohn's primary opponent, as the Republican nominee in 1992--the same Campbell who lost to Dianne Feinstein in 2000 by 19%. That year, I went to a Campbell "rally" at Cal State Northridge. The auditorium was all but empty, with about 14 or so in attendance.

Although Bruce Herschensohn lost to Boxer by less than five percentage points, he got more votes than President George Bush, who at the time was running for re-election, as well as the liberal Republican John "See More Taxes" Seymour, who was trounced by Dianne Feinstein.

Bruce Herschensohn has come closer to beating Boxer than has any other Republican. I believe Herschensohn would have won if President Bush hadn't abandoned California in his re-election campaign.

45 posted on 04/03/2013 10:45:37 AM PDT by Fiji Hill (Io Triumphe!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: Hilda; All
26 posted on 4/3/2013 10:58:22 AM by Hilda: “Supporting perverted Republicans makes it very hard to defend conservative values. Gay marriage, serial marriage, abortion and adultery are all part of the same sickness. Conservatives need to oppose ALL of it.”

You sure got that right.

It does not take a social conservative to understand that a man who cheats on his wife, lies to cover it up, and essentially abandons the governance of his state for his mistress is not someone who ought to be trusted.

In the old days it took a beautiful female spy to get political leaders to do things like that. Somebody correct me if I'm wrong, but I'm not aware that Argentina has sent spies to the United States in recent history. However, it now looks like too many political leaders, including conservative political leaders, are willing to do that without being targeted for blackmail by femme fatales from foreign forces.

Good grief, this is South Carolina. If conservative Republicans in South Carolina can't keep their pants zipped, and then Republican primary voters decide to put them back on the ballot, that says more about the conservative movement than it should.

46 posted on 04/03/2013 10:47:52 AM PDT by darrellmaurina
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: Fiji Hill

If you look at the Cali voting trends over time, it wasn’t about the conclusion, just the timing of total liberal takeover.
Now you have outcomes like DiFi with 63%, Obama with 60%, Dem supermajority in the legislature.


47 posted on 04/03/2013 10:53:34 AM PDT by nascarnation (Baraq's economic policy: trickle up poverty)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

A refusal to vote for Sanford is a vote to make Nancy Pelosi Speaker. It is also a vote to make Nita Lowrey chairwoman of Appropriations, and Chris Van Hollen chairman of Budget.
Try to read this entire list without becoming ill.
George Miller — Education and Workforce
Henry Waxman – Energy and Commerce
Maxine Waters – Financial Services
John Conyers – Judiciary
Edward Markey – Natural Resources
Elijah Cummings – Oversight and Government Reform
Nydia Velazquez – Small Business


48 posted on 04/03/2013 10:57:31 AM PDT by Aegedius (Veni, vidi, icked-kay utt-bay.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Aegedius

Yes what happens is there are a number of idiot libs in totally non-competitive 90% Democrat urban districts who build up high seniority. When the party has control, they are the committee chairs.

Scary stuff.


49 posted on 04/03/2013 11:00:25 AM PDT by nascarnation (Baraq's economic policy: trickle up poverty)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: nascarnation
If you look at the Cali voting trends over time, it wasn’t about the conclusion, just the timing of total liberal takeover.

Californians elected a conservative governor in 1982 and 186, but by 1992, demographic trends were beginning to favor the Democrats. That was probably the last year the Republicans had a chance to win a US Senate seat or a major state office--with the exception of the 2003 recall election, which was a free-for-all donnybrook.

50 posted on 04/03/2013 11:10:42 AM PDT by Fiji Hill (Io Triumphe!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-72 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson