Skip to comments.Report: FBI Benghazi Survivor Interviews Delivered to Senate Intel Committee
Posted on 03/03/2013 7:56:23 AM PST by smoothsailing
March 3, 2013
A source told CBS News that FBI transcripts of interviews with Benghazi survivors were turned over to the Senate Intelligence Committee on Thursday........
The documents that came from the White House is the second set to be sent to Congress. The initial set of documents related to the attack were considered insufficient due to massive redactions....
The documents that were sent on Thursday had fewer redactions. They show that e-mail correspondence reveal talking points that were sent around the White House, the FBI, and the Justice Department. Fox News reported:
Sources said the emails revealed heavy editing by then-CIA Director David Petraeus. The talking points evolved as they were passed around various intelligence and security hubs, and scrubbed of language referring to al Qaida. They also seemed to indicate an effort to paint the Sept. 11 attack as a demonstration and not a planned attack, the source said.
The word attacks was changed to demonstration, the source said....
(Excerpt) Read more at breitbart.com ...
No one can convince me that the broad wasn't a "hit" on Petraeus.
Is CBS providing cover-up spin?
Is CBS providing cover-up spin for the Obama Administration?
Yeah... delivered after they had been sufficiently scrubbed them of any evidence against the little socialist dictator wannabe and his pathethically inept administration...
The list, Ping
Let me know if you would like to be on or off the ping list
Hilarious to send redacted documents to the “Senate Intelligence Committee”. Aren’t they supposed to be the most trusted group of Senators in DC? LOL. Coverup anyone?
On Saturday night show, Judge Jeannine Pirro has been asking the survivors to contact her. I wish they would.
America needs whistleblowers.
What is left to keep secret about Benghazi? The thugs obviously knew what was going on there. Everybody knows the Who?, What?, When?, Where? And How?. The only thing missing is the Why? And that is the critical question. The Democrats have to keep that hidden, or it’s the end of their party.
The initial set of documents related to the attack were considered insufficient due to massive redactions... The documents that were sent on Thursday had fewer redactions. They show that e-mail correspondence reveal talking points that were sent around the White House, the FBI, and the Justice Department.
Anyone wanting on or off this ping list, please advise.
Whether it was a “hit” or not, he still selfishly betrayed his country and went along with the lie then fell on his sword. That’s what’s wrong with this country. Most people at the top love themselves more.
petraeus hit himself as a way out of the Benghazi debacle. The whole mistress thing was a strategic gem. And if you don’t believe that, then you don’t know petraeus. It was a masterstroke of strategy...and now you think he’s a victim? He was also the very first official to speak to the survivors...of whom there weren’t supposed to be any.
Had Ty Woods and Glen Doherty not disobeyed direct orders, there WOULDN’T be any. They were cia contractors. They worked for petraeus.
petraeus was also the first official ON THE GROUND in Benghazi after the attack.
I would normally think so, but this info came from Sharyl Attkisson. She is a rare jewel in the mainstream media. An investigative reporter who has actually been pursuing the truth about Benghazi from the beginning.
Then why would Petraeus admit the affair and resign?
Good for her! I like Judge Jeannine, she’s feisty.
Why would White Hut talking points be redacted? What’s the “national interest” at stake? Obama’s re-election and coverup of a botched 3AM phone call moment in the wake of yet another terrorist attack on his watch?
Barack Hussein Obama gave a “mission accomplished” speech to the United Nations in September of 2011. Not long after his sanctioned hit squad murdered a POW named Momar Gaddafi (Sec. of Hate Hillary Clinton chorted “WE came, WE saw, HE DIED!!”) we have bigger sh!t going on over there against us.
Incompetence or treason, he’s guilty of aiding the warcrime torture and murder of a POW head of state. “What if” Bush had done the same in absence of trial for Saddam?
And he has instilled Islamist theocratic rule across the Muddled East. The man may be a secular humanist, but he has a hard on for Islamic theocracy.
Remember when the DNCmedia were telling us that the locals were trying to SAVE our Ambassador? Getting him out of a burning building and all...
Ranks up there with media reports that Jackie Kennedy was getting out of the limo because she was running to "get help".
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.