Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: AdmSmith; AnonymousConservative; Berosus; bigheadfred; Bockscar; ColdOne; Convert from ECUSA; ...

Thanks smoothsailing.
The initial set of documents related to the attack were considered “insufficient” due to massive redactions... The documents that were sent on Thursday had fewer redactions. They show that e-mail correspondence reveal ”talking points” that were sent around the White House, the FBI, and the Justice Department.

12 posted on 03/03/2013 9:29:53 AM PST by SunkenCiv (Romney would have been worse, if you're a dumb ass.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: SunkenCiv

Why would White Hut talking points be redacted? What’s the “national interest” at stake? Obama’s re-election and coverup of a botched 3AM phone call moment in the wake of yet another terrorist attack on his watch?

Barack Hussein Obama gave a “mission accomplished” speech to the United Nations in September of 2011. Not long after his sanctioned hit squad murdered a POW named Momar Gaddafi (Sec. of Hate Hillary Clinton chorted “WE came, WE saw, HE DIED!!”) we have bigger sh!t going on over there against us.

Incompetence or treason, he’s guilty of aiding the warcrime torture and murder of a POW head of state. “What if” Bush had done the same in absence of trial for Saddam?

And he has instilled Islamist theocratic rule across the Muddled East. The man may be a secular humanist, but he has a hard on for Islamic theocracy.


19 posted on 03/03/2013 11:05:47 AM PST by a fool in paradise (America 2013 - STUCK ON STUPID)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson