To: EveningStar
LOL! Wouldn’t surprise me one bit. Correction, though.. The sails would be pink or rainbow striped.
To: EveningStar
No frigging in the rigging!...........
3 posted on
02/15/2013 12:03:44 PM PST by
Red Badger
(Lincoln freed the slaves. Obama just got them ALL back......................)
To: EveningStar
4 posted on
02/15/2013 12:11:04 PM PST by
GeronL
(http://asspos.blogspot.com)
To: EveningStar
They’re already destroying a perfectly good $250 million mine warfare ship in the Philippines to save a coral reef, so this isn’t much of a stretch.
5 posted on
02/15/2013 12:19:10 PM PST by
2ndDivisionVet
(I'll raise $2million for Sarah Palin's presidential run. What'll you do?)
To: EveningStar
So are the F-18s going to have to depart from under the bottom of the sails? :-)
6 posted on
02/15/2013 12:21:44 PM PST by
Fast Moving Angel
(A moral wrong is not a civil right: No religious sanction of an irreligious act.)
To: EveningStar
Interesting pic but....that amount of square yardage would be nowhere enough to move a 90,000 ton CV. Unless there was a hurricane providing a tail wind.
7 posted on
02/15/2013 12:26:39 PM PST by
Bloody Sam Roberts
(Here once the embattled farmers stood... And fired the shot heard round the world.)
To: EveningStar
Wonder what happens when It’s time to launch the fA-18’s. Turn into the wind????
11 posted on
02/15/2013 3:29:42 PM PST by
batterycommander
(a little more rubble, a lot less trouble)
To: EveningStar
Instead of wind power, they might use underwater sails and tach to the current! At least the submariners would have a fun time trying it. /s
12 posted on
02/15/2013 3:34:58 PM PST by
Cvengr
(Adversity in life and death is inevitable. Thru faith in Christ, stress is optional.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson