It's a free blog hosting operation.
Any retarded homeless syphilitic pervert can "write" a blog on Wordpress.
And most of them, it seems, do just that.
Nothing on a blog should be taken seriously.
Posted on 02/09/2013 7:40:05 AM PST by LSUfan
I totally agree. It is important to anticipate what the other side will do to try to undermine him.
“Whaaaat? Grover Norquist a Moo? I never heard that — you have something to prove that? “
Grover Norquist is the conservative’s enemy within.
How did you miss it? Frank Gaffney, Michelle Malkin, dozens have warned us about Grover. He’s close with CAIR. He got his muslim wife appointed to USCIS and managed to help ruin that outfit. Got his brother appointed to head another Bush agency and ran it off the tracks. He’s the guy who got the radical muslims, along with Abramoff into Bush’s white house.
Norquist is the founder of the Islamic Institute.
Start here:
By Frank J Gaffney Jr.
FrontPageMagazine.com | December 9, 2003
Why We Are Publishing This Article by David Horowitz
On the basis of the evidence assembled here, it seems beyond dispute that Grover Norquist has formed alliances with prominent Islamic radicals who have ties to the Saudis and to Libya and to Palestine Islamic Jihad, and who are now under indictment by U.S. authorities. Equally troubling is that the arrests of these individuals and their exposure as agents of terrorism have not resulted in noticeable second thoughts on Grover’s part or any meaningful effort to dissociate himself from his unsavory friends.
As Frank Gaffney’s article recounts, Grover’s own Islamic Institute was initially financed by one of the most notorious of these operatives, Abdurahman Alamoudi, a supporter of Hamas and Hezbollah who told the Annual Convention of the Islamic Association of Palestine in 1996, “If we are outside this country we can say ‘Oh, Allah destroy America.’ But once we are here, our mission in this country is to change it.” Grover appointed Alamoudi’s deputy, Khaled Saffuri to head his own organization. Together they gained access to the White House for Alamoudi and Sami al-Arian and others with similar agendas who used their cachet to spread Islamist influence to the American military and the prison system and the universities and the political arena with untold consequences for the nation. [snip]
http://www.frontpagemag.com/articles/readarticle.asp?ID=11209&p=1
What loyalties do Brennan and Obama really have individually and what loyalties do they share?
Obama, IMO, has transparently pretended to be Christian but was raised as a Marxist secular humanist with empathy for the “oppression” of Muslim by “colonialist” white Christians and Jews, especially in Israel.
Brennan appears to have converted to being some sort of Muslim. But to what extent was he just pragmatically lubricating his access to all of the “holy sites” and insinuating himself into Saudi society at the highest levels in furtherance of his CIA objectives much in the same way that by being nominally Christian Obama has done the same thing in US society?
Together Obama and Brennan have blasted thousands of Jihadi Al Qaeda, and these folks are the sworn enemies of the Saudi royal family, a family that has reportedly nurtured Brennan’s conversion and also reportedly funded Obama’s Law School education.
Guandolo is claiming that Brennan was “flipped” by the Saudis based not just on his conversion but on his suppression of effective education of DHS and DOD on the parts of the Koran that Al Qaeda claims to justify killing all Americans...parts of the Koran that the Saudis are spending billions around the world promoting in their Mosques even as they themselves fight off Al Qaeda.
This month the Obama/Brennan cabal will attempt to beat Israel into submission on surrendering crucial strategic real estate (1967 borders) to the Palestinians in a way that closely matches the Saudi step-by-step plan for eventual re-absorption of Israel back into the caliphate.
I regard both Obama and Brennan as sock-puppets for the Marxist Chicago gang but with secular Muslim sympathies. Obama’s Palestinian pals were of the PA secular socialist type, not the more orthodox Hamas/MB type. Yet MB infiltration into the US Gov’t is undeniable.
IMO, Obama and Brennan ultimately want a Soros-style crony Marxist world order that accommodates some traditional Muslim sensibilities like kicking the Israelis out of most of Jerusalem, but not a world orthodox Muslim caliphate as the Saudis and Al Qaeda separately imagine.
Obama’s homosexual agenda-pushing crusade and placing women in combat roles and abortion policy cannot be reconciled with any sort of Islam (or any traditional religion). To the extent that Brennan can support this liberal Democrat social agenda and still be any kind of alleged orthodox Muslim is a mystery to me.
My stomach churns....US truly is in danger.
I look at my nieces and nephews and want to cry for their destinies if we can't turn things around now...
Daily Mail Article:
David Petraeus was brought down after betrayal by vengeful CIA agents and his own bodyguards who made sure his affair was exposed, claims new book
SNIP
Murphy and co-author Brandon Webb also revealed that the September 11 Benghazi terrorist attack that killed four Americans, including Ambassador Chris Stevens, was retaliation by Islamist militants who had been targeted by covert U.S. military operations.
The book claims that neither Stevens nor even Petraeus knew about the raids by American special operations troops, which had 'kicked a hornet's nest' among the heavily-armed fighters after the overthrow of Libyan dictator Muammar Gaddafi.
John Brennan, President Barack Obama's Deputy National Security Adviser, had been authorizing 'unilateral operations in North Africa outside of the traditional command structure,' according to the e-book. Brennan is Obama's pick to replace Petraeus as head of the CIA.
SNIP
The authors say that senior intelligence officers working on the 7th floor of Central Intelligence headquarters in Langley, Virginia, used their political clout to ensure that the FBI investigated the former Army general's personal life.
They then told Petraeus that they would publicly humiliate him if he didn't admit the affair and resign.
SNIP
Webb and Murphy claim that the September 11, 2012, attack on the U.S. consulate and a CIA outpost in Benghazi proved to Petraeus that he was an outsider in the Obama administration and that he would remain marginalized as long as he was at the CIA.
It's a free blog hosting operation.
Any retarded homeless syphilitic pervert can "write" a blog on Wordpress.
And most of them, it seems, do just that.
Nothing on a blog should be taken seriously.
I've been aware for a while -- not that long, a year maybe -- that Norquist's wife has Hamas connections and that he's been palling around with Alamoudi and the other people you mention, who should never have come closer to the White House than the Pennsylvania Avenue fence.
That still doesn't signify the final degree of commitment that a personal conversion to Wahhabism and Salafism would imply, and until the man declares himself a Moslem, as with Obama, his associations allow us only to say, "I think he is a Moslem." After all, he has not made a statement like the one Obama made to Nicholas Kristof in 2007, in which Obama "happened" to recite the entire Shehada, the Moslem Confiteor, in Arabic, while entertaining Kristof with the sound of the evening call to prayer. And we do not have the Egyptian foreign minister telling Cairo newspapermen, "That man told me he is a Moslem."
You may be right -- but you may be mistaken, and all of Norquist's associations may be laid on undue influence by his wife and the allure of available political money, the crack cocaine of politics.
I don't think you can sustain the identification of Marxism with secular humanism, since Marxism is a rigid ideology of romantic utopian affinities whose adherents have regularly murdered people into the millions in order to build their utopia. We might add that all utopias are necessarily dystopian, ever since Thomas More mentioned by-the-by that dissent wasn't tolerated in Utopia and that people would be executed to enforce the public political peace and defend the ideology of Utopia; this is hardly humanism.
It would be better to say that Marxists are monomanaically epiphenomenal materialists who don't mind snuffing out other people's phenomena. If they allowed people to think (rather than just theorize) they might be scientific materialists; but they don't, so the science part is only a claim, made for the cachet -- and to support the further claim that "science is on our side" and "truth has a bias to the Left" (< / off Colbert >).
I think Obama triangulates (or quadrilateralizes, or trapezoidizes, or hexagonizes) among varieties of anti-Americanism. It's true he's a "red-diaper" baby and that he was coddled by Communists from birth to manhood (of a sort). It's true likewise that he has attached himself to the most vigorous cause people in the world right now, Moslems who (like Communists) view America as the Main Enemy opposing their rehomogenization of the Hijaz and driving all the Jews into the sea, or into large open pits for casual cremation.
It may be that, like Susan Sontag, who once used her reputation as an intellectual to strike a pose for the benefit of Communist recruiters in the black community, that "the Caucasian race is the cancer of the planet", Obama's Islamism is operational and not truly felt or believed in.
Either way, pretending to be both helps him pretend to be neither, as the man who calls him a Communist contradicts implicitly anyone who calls him a Moslem, and both are contradicted by Reverend Wright and his "down-low" club.
Under any rubric you like, the misdirective deception protects him from his just critics.
Then I guess you wouldn't have been impressed by Jesus of Nazareth or Gautama Buddha unless they rolled up in new trucks.
“You may be right — but you may be mistaken, and all of Norquist’s associations may be laid on undue influence by his wife and the allure of available political money, the crack cocaine of politics. “
Mistaken about what...that he is a Muslim convert? He’s been asked and has refused to answer. His questionable associations started before he had the wife. Grover is out for Grover. Period.
Women make up nearly 40% pf Iran’s basij. There are squads of women terrorists. I have dvds full of women training for jihad.
It is only black, white, and Asian babies who are aborted. muslims reproduce like cockroaches.
obama’s policies are definitely consistent with islam. ALSO, homosexuality in islam is so rampant they don’t even have a word for it in the arab language. It’s the ones who dress like women, wear makeup, and flaunt it they don’t like. So all the reasons you gave just don’t take away from obama being a muslim. In fact, they enhance it. .
Let’s just make it clear that it’s YOU who are likening Jesus
to some blogger. Not me.
This mess could be arrow-true and I wouldn’t buy it from some cholo with an internet connection and nothing else.
Interesting. So if he is totally selfish, then any spiritual jihad in him is over, and godliness lost. Therefore he can't be a "submitted" Moslem (but I repeat myself), but is instead an unrepentant egotist who stands outside the Umma of the submissive.
Sounds like he's just using the Moo's, and the Moo's are using him. What was that Kipling line about hustling the East?
“Women make up nearly 40% pf Iran’s basij. There are squads of women terrorists. I have dvds full of women training for jihad.”
The female Iranian basij are Shiite and the more secular PA parages a lot of women around but I don’t believe that any significant combat casualties inflicted by Israelis or the US have been on women or the media would be all over it. The Shia are also more tolerant of gender and sex orientation problems, IIRC.
In the WOT so far it appears to me that 99% of casualties inflicted by the US are on Al Qaeda (Sunni) males and the US drone operators pretty much are ordered not to hit any females as primary targets and to avoid hitting them as collateral targets except for extreme cases.
No, I'm likening you to some Pharisee who isn't impressed by anything anyone has to say, who isn't well-turned-out and smooth-talking like Tony Robbins and Joel Osteen.
Which in Texas would include a decent truck.
This mess could be arrow-true and I wouldn’t buy it from some cholo with an internet connection and nothing else.
Why cholo? That's what people in Peru call someone who elsewhere is called cuatrero, 3/4 Indio and 1/4 pureblood European or criollo.
Would someone who's jíbaro or requinterón be more to your liking?
But at least we've established that someone has to show up well to be worth your time of day.
Someone with a good suit, good manners, a passable smile and handshake, and some resources. Someone like Vladimir Putin.
I would say that Robbins and Osteen can bite my ass, but Robbins
has a giant jaw which would take 80% of the available mass and Osteen would enjoy it too much.
Just supposing that this homeless syphilitic perverted blogster
had somehow got ahold of this info.. because someone in County
lock-up mentioned it, or the med-tech at the AIDS clinic perhaps....
Anyway, the blogtard has this story.. so he puts it out on WORDPRESS?
He doesn’t sell it to any legitimate site?
You know, the kind of site with assets and reputation?
Breitbart maybe, or that Malkin chick? No, he goes straight
to the library computer and his Wordpress account. Right.
Sorry, but like I said, this could be brilliantly true
but I’ll not have it from some indigent free-service blogger.
See, now here is something a bit more credible:
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2987194/posts
Note that slippery language is used.. “claims”... “believed”...
Could be totally true, who knows yet.
Fact is, I’ll not be lending credence to some diseased blogger at a library computer.
Even if he’s right.
How about THEM apples?
“My Muslim faith” bump
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.