See, now here is something a bit more credible:
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2987194/posts
Note that slippery language is used.. “claims”... “believed”...
Could be totally true, who knows yet.
Fact is, I’ll not be lending credence to some diseased blogger at a library computer.
Even if he’s right.
How about THEM apples?
Sounds like we are where we were before .... you don't dig these Paul of Tarsus types who itinerate through the Web posting sermons and revelations. Your revelations have to come from the Temple .... is that right? .... like my cousin's wife, who told me once she wouldn't believe a Canadian clergyman could be pulled down from his pulpit by gay activists and put on trial with his freedom in the balance, on the sayso of a Stateside ministry-supported website rather than "the newspaper of record", viz., The New York Times or the Washington Post. Which has to be very comfy and cuddly for her liberal biases, but which also means, if "Pinchy" Sulzberger says something didn't happen, then it didn't happen.
Turns out in this case that it did, and she climbed down awkwardly after I sent her a story from an Edmonton newspaper, in the town where it happened, with all the legal details just as the little ministry site had laid it out. I still haven't forgiven her, btw, because that was a) snobbery, b) purblindness, and c) her political judgment that told me she thought I am a worthless PoS for not being in synch with the mighty New York Faggoty Times.