Posted on 02/09/2013 7:40:05 AM PST by LSUfan
excerpts from a newly published book about the Benghazi debacle:
“(Deputy National Security Advisor) John Brennan also ran a highly compartmentalized program out of the White House in regard to weapons transfers, and Stevens would not have been trusted with that type of information. Stevens likely helped consolidate as many weapons as possible after the war to safeguard them, at which point Brennan exported them overseas to start another conflict.”
“Behind closed doors, President Obama had given his counter terrorism adviser, John Brennan, carte blanche to run operations in North Africa and the Middle East, provided he didn’t do anything that ended up becoming an exposé in The New York Times and embarrassing the administration. In 2012, a secret war across North Africa was well underway.”
Note also that this comes out immediately AFTER the Benghazi hearings. One wonders if any of the majors will pick up on it. The Daily Mail and William and Morrow are big enough outlets that they may not be able to ignore it. This will be interesting.
Both Bushes went to war for Saudis. GWB holds hands with Saudi King. Obama bows to the Saudi King.
The former advisor for Obama David Axelrod is the great, great grandson of Leon Trotsky the butcher. Most of Obamas sppointees are Communist. He andwers to Putin.
Both Bushes went to war for Saudis. GWB holds hands with Saudi King. Obama bows to the Saudi King.
The former advisor for Obama David Axelrod is the great, great grandson of Leon Trotsky the butcher. Most of Obamas sppointees are Communist. He andwers to Putin.
Both Bushes went to war for Saudis. GWB holds hands with Saudi King. Obama bows to the Saudi King.
The former advisor for Obama David Axelrod is the great, great grandson of Leon Trotsky the butcher. Most of Obamas sppointees are Communist. He andwers to Putin.
Putin is a lot of things, a Communist isn't one of them.
Sounds like we are where we were before .... you don't dig these Paul of Tarsus types who itinerate through the Web posting sermons and revelations. Your revelations have to come from the Temple .... is that right? .... like my cousin's wife, who told me once she wouldn't believe a Canadian clergyman could be pulled down from his pulpit by gay activists and put on trial with his freedom in the balance, on the sayso of a Stateside ministry-supported website rather than "the newspaper of record", viz., The New York Times or the Washington Post. Which has to be very comfy and cuddly for her liberal biases, but which also means, if "Pinchy" Sulzberger says something didn't happen, then it didn't happen.
Turns out in this case that it did, and she climbed down awkwardly after I sent her a story from an Edmonton newspaper, in the town where it happened, with all the legal details just as the little ministry site had laid it out. I still haven't forgiven her, btw, because that was a) snobbery, b) purblindness, and c) her political judgment that told me she thought I am a worthless PoS for not being in synch with the mighty New York Faggoty Times.
She didn't want to believe on their/my sayso, that Canadian homoactivists could get a minister of the gospel put on trial, with a jail sentence possibly on the line, for preaching undiluted Leviticus.
(The b.s. "Human Rights Court" was a screwed-up affair, in which people could be "indicted" in what amounted to a civil-court proceeding, and tried according to civil-court standards of evidence and judgment, and then if found guilty, fined, found against for material damages or, if they refused to pay, imprisoned. It was a real cluster**** of an idea, mixing criminal charges with civil standards of judgment, to "get" anti-gay spokesmen, and has since been mooted under the Canadian constitution by another case. These courts may be totally unconstitutional.)
Many words but little understanding of my point.
A blogger is under no obligation to write the truth.
He has no reputation, no assets, no identity.
He can be a homeless conspiracy nut.
He’s not even compelled to write grammatically or checked on any aspect of anything.
It’s “anything goes” with bloggers, they can write about Godzilla
stomping the crap out of Disneyland if they want to. Who’s to stop ‘em?
You’ll kindly forgive me for not ascribing the highest level of credibility to a blogger.
Even if he’s right, he most likely copied the info from another source.
Let’s see the mainstream confirm.
Was a newspaperman, ever? Federalist newspapermen lied their asses off about the Constitution and pooh-poohed a Bill of Rights, hiding behind the awesome rep of their golem, the New York banker Alexander Hamilton. But the Antifederalists made it clear that no BoR would be a deal-breaker, so the Yankee businessmen acceded, after taking a mental note to smash the South and break down the BoR later. Which they did.
He has no reputation, no assets, no identity. He can be a homeless conspiracy nut.
Hmm, sounds like old Tom Paine to me. Didn't he die in the French Terror?
The American Revolution ruined a lot of the Signers.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.